Welcome to the Q&A Forum

In short if you have a report that shows a F, yet it still ranks in top 50, then maybe you should look into it and see why. Some times google gives you good rank for for your keyword on the wrong page, dont fight it go with it.

Hi Elias! Unfortunately, we don't have rank tracking in Google mobile and I'm not sure of any other company that does.  I'll pass the message along to our team, though, and we'll see what we can do to add that functionality down the line. Also, did you know we have a feature request forum? It's a great place to share your ideas. Other people can vote on them and it will help us determine priorities. You should check it out: http://seomoz.zendesk.com/forums Thanks again for letting us know!

Yes sorry, that's what I meant It can't be exact of course as SEOmoz don't know the algo, but it's as close as anyone is going to get.

This article might be able to help a little.  It does not use SEO Moz campaigns to track keyword performance but does discuss how you can crawl search results from google for a to group keywords and then pair those results with data from Open Site Explorer.  You would not necessarily be interested in the second part.  Perhaps the spreadsheets discussed in these articles can help? http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/competitive-analysis-in-under-60-seconds-using-google-docs-12649 http://www.distilled.net/blog/seo/how-to-build-agile-seo-tools-using-google-docs/ http://www.conversationmarketing.com/2011/04/linkscape-google-spreadsheets.htm The first article references the second and third article.  The second article talks about how to use spreadsheets to scrape sites (include google SERP).  The third article mentions automatically grabbing data once a mont or so.  Seems like you could get a solution for what you are looking for with these three articles.

try to export the data in excel ... there you can sort, copy, paste, create new lists, etc.

Yes, they give the content area the most weight in regard to individual page topical focus, however search engines do evaluate  every word on a page, including content within the source view that visitors don't see.  This is why having too much content in header, sidebar and footer areas, or too much code at the source view level causes topical confusion / topical dilution and is considered during the duplicate content evaluation process as well. The best I can offer in regard to how often a phrase should appear on a page is "does this feel like I repeat this phrase too much?"  If you've got the same phrase repeated fifteen times just in the content area, there should be a valid reason other than just SEO reasoning for that.  And a LOT of text around those.

Google Trends allows you to get an idea of something like that and the Google Keyword Tool will show you data from the previous twelve months. http://trends.google.com https://adwords.google.com/select/KeywordToolExternal

The link might not be in the OSE index which is where the PA data is coming from.  If you do have a clean link pointing to the page you can be pretty sure there's some link juice flowing to it, but it will take time for the site to be crawled and that link strength to be added.

Hi Jabbate! I know we answered your question through the customer service ticket you submitted, but I thought I'd show it here too in case anyone else had the same question.  So, here goes: You can obtain more than 25 links per domain by using our API, which allows you to build your own tools off of our database. If you have an SEOmoz account you can generate credentials there and start playing around instantly. You will need a developer to write some code so that you can make requests for information directly to our database. That developer will probably also need to build you an interface so you can view the results and make sense of them. The API allows you to innovate and build your own tools, or incorporate our data into tools you already have. You can learn more about the API here: http://apiwiki.seomoz.org You can review sample code here:http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/w/page/Sample-Code Let me know if there are any questions!

You are operating under the assumption of the random surfer model, which weights all links equally. Under the reasonable surfer model, links are weighted based on the likelihood they will get clicked. Therefore, internal links pass a whole lot of that mozRank. There is also no guarantee that all 5.56 mozRank is passed in some form or another. Each link passes a portion of it, but that doesn't mean if you add them all up you will necessarily get 5.56. That's just the most you could get.

Do send an email to help@seomoz.org about this with the details about this, they'll want to know and see if they need to tell Roger to go behave.

Thanks for all of the suggestions everyone! We're aware that there are old questions that tend to linger, and we're working on some solutions. Dunamis, why wouldn't an email work for you? I had thought an email might be one of the more effective ways of letting people know there had been answers to their questions, so I'd like to hear why it wouldn't work for some people. Some of the people who asked questions were in a trial membership, and are now basic members, so they can't mark something as answered. I am either marking those as answered, or a discussion question. I'm also leaving notes on questions asking people if this has answered their question, but not everyone is subscribed to their own questions by email, especially on the older questions. When Q&A first launched, it wasn't as active, so my hypothesis is that people didn't get a response right away and didn't sign up for email notifications, then just stopped checking for answers.

I'm not sure what the deal is with blue flags and report cards, but if you have duplicate pages, you should either use the 301 redirect or the rel=canonical tag. My guess is that maybe you had a rel=canonical tag on a page that pointed to the same page, so maybe the crawling tool took that to be some kind of error? I don't know, but make sure your duplicate pages are either redirected to the original or that they use a rel=canonical tag to specify the original, and don't worry about any reports that are simply notifying you of the purpose of a canonical tag.

Thanks Doc Yeah I think I have a problem accepting any kind of reward for anything to be honest. Even when I get paid by a client I feel bad for taking the money, even though we've done a good job for them. I don't know what that's about lol. But anyway thank you very much. It's good to hear someone had the same worries and paranoia before. I'll stop worrying about it now

For external links a straight division of of PR by links per page isn't the best correlation to Google's ranking and PR system. Things like link location on page, number of links to the same site, anchor links, link text, nearby text, and more all play a part in calculating how much link juice to pass.  The short answer, they don't exactly say.  The long answer can be found on the pages referenced below, but you still won't get an exact number.  The take away is that SEOmoz is constantly working to correlate their Linkscape produced data and rankings to Google's data and rankings. References: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/determining-whether-a-page-site-passes-link-juice http://www.seomoz.org/blog/pagerank-sculpting-parsing-the-value-and-potential-benefits-of-sculpting-pr-with-nofollow http://apiwiki.seomoz.org/w/page/13991139/Juice-Passing http://www.seomoz.org/blog/early-ranking-factors-data-an-april-linkscape-update http://www.seomoz.org/blog/linkscapes-august-update-better-domain-authority-numbers-new-partners-and-more

Thank you!

OSE tends to update every 1-2 months. What I do is use linkdiagnosis.com to pull links that are indexed in CSV format, then use OSE to get authority, mozRank and Trust stats. This way you can get all your newly crawled links and get the great OSE insight.

Hi Joe, I have found that most scores for what I deem to be mildly competitive keywords seem to be around the 45% - 55% Mark, with those being strongly competitive at 60%+ and low competition at about 25%. I have never come across anything dropping below 25% or above the high 60% range so for me I use these as the limits. So to answer your question I would classify a score of 60% much more competitive than a score of 50%. Mark