Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Review the Google guidelines for quality content to make sure your site meets as many as possible. Google may not want to put crack and pirate blog posts at the top of the search results.

I see multiple potential problems here.

1. This could be seen as a paid link.
2. Search engines are not fond of duplicate content, so are likely to show a result from just one of the sites.
3. The effort to make the content original enough for these different sites may be more trouble than it is worth. Quality sites likely will not be interested in posting content that is spun just enough for it to pass a Copyscape test.

There is no set number for ranking. You can have 100,000 backlinks, but if they're from sites like how to sell your house or for model airplanes, they won't help at all.

You want links from relevant sites, and you'll want to get the other sites a reason to link to you, usually in the form of good content on your site.

You can search on Quora or Reddit to see the types of questions people are asking, which will give you ideas for keywords and content.

Once you do write more content, do a review for accuracy. I took a quick look at the page for toasters made in the USA. The first toaster I looked at had a broken link. I found the correct link for that toaster and a second unit, and the Amazon description for both of them indicated they were not made in the USA.

Be sure you're not actively building links to your site from free-for-all directories, classified sites, or user profiles. If you've built them and have control over them, it's best to remove many of them.

Linking to a post about flat feet from an SEO forum (and using a nofollow attribute) is not the best way to build trust in the search engines.

You realize this site has nofollow links, right?

What about comment spam on seven-year-old posts? The links are all nofollow, FYI.

I see there's a link from the Help Hub. If you go there, there's a link to Contact Help.

And spamming lives on.

With mixed emotions, I announce that we are discontinuing SEOmoz private questions for PRO members in March of this year. SEOmoz has grown and changed considerably from when we started offering private questions in the summer of 2007 (see our announcement at http://www.seomoz.org/blog/new-feature-seo-qa). Unfortunately, private Q&A is no longer scalable for us, and our customers have noticed longer wait times for answers to their questions.

Why are we Discontinuing Private Q&A?

1. It's no longer scalable.
   When we started private Q&A, there were fewer than 1,600 paying subscribers eligible to ask a private Q&A question. At the close of 2012, that number has increased to over 20,000 PRO members, and we have had an average of 210 questions a month in private Q&A during 2012. We hire experts to answer these questions, and many of them already have full-time jobs in the field. It is difficult to find the right people to answer so many questions in a timely manner.

2. SEOmoz isn't a consulting business.
   We started offering private questions when we were still providing SEO consulting. We have not been in in the consulting business for three years, so it’s no longer a part of our core business. It is a piece that no longer makes sense for us. Instead, we want to focus our efforts on making the best SEO and social monitoring software possible, and boost our public Q&A as a resource for all. If you are looking for consulting, we have a great list of recommended companies at http://www.seomoz.org/article/recommended.

3. Our response time is slow.
      Our response times in private Q&A aren't always stellar. You'll get answers more quickly from the community in public Q&A, and the SEOmoz Staff and Associates will be spending more time answering questions and endorsing responses in Public Q&A. You’ll have an opportunity to earn even more MozPoints as we will be looking for great answers to endorse.

What is the Timeframe?
You'll still be able to ask private questions through March 15th, meaning all PRO members will have at least two more chances (February and March) to ask a private question. You'll also be able to see all of your old questions in your account through at least the end of March. We encourage you to save a copy of these questions for your future reference.

What about Public Q&A?
Public Q&A is only going to get better! You'll see more of our Staff and Associates in Public Q&A. They'll be answering questions, endorsing responses, and having a more visible role. We're also planning some enhancements for Public Q&A that will be rolled out in stages over the next few months, making it easier for you to know when you've been endorsed, follow questions, see your activity, and more.

Questions?
Please let us know any questions you have regarding this shutdown.

Thank you,

Keri Morgret
On-site Community Manager

Alhallinan, in all fairness, you said in your comment "Coming up with kick-ass content isn't the issue. We're really good at that. Its getting people to LINK to the kick ass content that is the problem. " and "But we can't get people to link to it for the life of us. We know its funny, great content, but no links in 12 months. What the heck?"

I believe EGOL was trying to address a couple of your comments in his response.

In looking at that link that you shared, my first thought was "this was written for keywords, not for the user". Specifically, "Hire SEO Expert Tip" doesn't read very naturally. Second, you'll likely have a hard time having other people in the industry link to a post that has four "tampa SEO" links for your five tips. It's obviously optimized for your terms and that talks about your company specifically. It's just not a stand-alone resource that other people would link to.

Hi! Moz can't access your Google Webmaster Tools or disavow file, so you won't see a change in DA by disavowing those links. Google will know about the change, but we won't. There's another thread asking for this feature, and we're discussing internally if anything around this is feasible, but any implementation would be a ways out right now.

There are a few of us that throw off the curve, in that we are former Moz employees so we've spent considerable time on the site, and had that "staff" banner, which made people more likely to mark what we said as Good Answer. It also made us less likely to get an answer Endorsed. Current staff and associates are not included on the leaderboard, so when someone active leaves Moz, suddenly there's a new person appearing high up. I started as an Associate with 35 Moz points, and left with about 9000. I'm sure I surprised a couple of people that paid attention to the top ten.

I don't have any insider knowledge of why SEOmoz chose Wistia, but there is some information in this post about the Top 10 Web Apps We Love. http://www.seomoz.org/blog/top-10-web-apps-we-love

Wistia is video hosting on steroids. Not only does this video hosting platform support HTML5, which makes your videos viewable on a slew of non-Flash enabled devices, but the platform is inherently designed for SEO.  Try searching Google for "Top 10 Web Apps We Love" and you'll likely see the above Wistia-hosted video that's included with this blog post. Their tracking and analytics are also the best we've seen in video hosting.  See a sample report here.

The page is gone, but the service will be back. I'm quoting from fellow employee Ruth Burr below:

We've given the "keys" to our directories list/database to Ian Lurie, who is collaborating with Mackenzie Fogelson and Distilled to put together a more robust and scalable solution for directories. With everything else we've got going on, we decided that curating the directories list was beyond the time/resources we have to devote to it. I know this gang of trusted providers will do a great job with it! Other than redirecting the page and handing over the existing list, Moz won't be actively involved with the project."

If I search site:loseweight.com on Google, your site is indexed.

However, your site looks to be a duplicate of diet.com. The search engines generally frown upon duplicate content. If diet.com has been up for a long time and this copy of the site just went up, the search engines will view diet.com as the authoritative source for that content and not view loseweight.com as the authority.

Can you give us a little more background about the site and the duplication with diet.com?

Hi Brian,

BuildMyRank has been discussed on the SEOmoz Q&A before, and usually not in the most positive manner, mainly because of the way people lean here, but some have had success. I personally have reservations about using this type of service. Here's a few links to other Q&A threads that can show you the discussion that's already taken place to help you out a little. a search on google for [site:seomoz.org buildmyrank] will show several threads.

http://www.seomoz.org/q/build-my-rank

http://www.seomoz.org/q/good-link-networks

In looking at the FAQ for BMR, I see that they randomly put your article on a site and you can have one link per 150 words, with the minimum article being 150 words. I envision sites with a bunch of very short (or very link-stuffed) posts on all kinds of subjects. That's not the type of backlink strategy I would want for my own site, I know that much.

It's easy to create .edu and .gov links to your website. Lots of places will do it for you for cheap. They'll find a guestbook that a professor set up ten years ago and forgot about, and leave a comment with a link. Along with 1,200 other comments with links that are spamming. It's real obvious to the search engines that this type of link is not credible and it's not going to help you in the long run.

What resource do you have that is of value to someone with an .edu and .gov website? Figure out what you have to offer that they would want, then contact them.

They're called mini-sitelinks, and Google decides when to display them. Here's a post from when they first debuted: http://readwrite.com/2009/04/16/google_gets_sitelink_one-liners