Welcome to the Q&A Forum

CMC is correct - thats how I do it for larger sites. delete all columns except the URL column (col A) and the duplicate pages column (now Col B) in cell C2, enter this formula:  =len(b2)  it will calculate the characters in dupe pages cell drag that cell down to last row select all three columns and sort col c by largest to smallest Obviously this isn't going to give you an exact number of dupe pages since URL text strings can vary in length, but it does give you a pretty good idea of the worst offenders....

Thanks dan. True. Im gonna dig into social media.

Thanks Chris, I just used that tool. Looks great. And now allows 2500 domain checks.

Hi kadesmith! This is Megan from the SEOmoz Help Team.  If you want to remove a report that you're not interested in, you can click on the keyword and choose the option to 'stop running weekly'. Also, you can always manually generate reports for any URL and one of your keywords. Simply go to the Report Card tab in the On Page section, and cut and paste or type a new URL into the URL drop box. Then select your keyword from the drop down and select "Grade My Optimization." After that, you can tell the Web App to start tracking that combination in the future by selecting the option to 'run this report weekly', and you should start seeing weekly reports. I hope this helps!  If you have more questions about On-Page reports, you can check out this help resource here:  http://www.seomoz.org/help/on-page-reports Cheers!

I use the following tools: Xenu - identifies broken links GSite Enterprise Crawler - identifies on page issues Google Cache, Google Webmaster Tools - finds crawling issues Scritch - finds server/platform type Ahrefs, Majestic, OSE - for link diagnostics SEO Book Bulk Server Header Tool

Thanks for the two quick and thorough responses.  The site is about to be re-launched and that will address a lot of the issues regarding on page etc. It is interesting to read your thoughts (Robert - I think I understood yours a bit more than Donford, but both helpful).

Thanks Marcus. It is wordpress I am using and already have the Yoast WP plugin. I'll try nondexing the author and date taxonomies too. I have done so with the tags but they still show up on the SEOmoz report. Good idea about varying the categories - will give that a go and see if anything changes

Thank you for the reply Megan, just what I was looking for.

Hi ccgdm! Thanks for writing in. Yes, adding social data to custom reports is something that we planned for. It's on our development backlog, and it's definitely a higher priority. I don't have a release date, but we're hoping to have it within the next 6 months. Sorry I couldn't be more help! Cheers, Jackie

here it is - http://i46.tinypic.com/zy6o2.jpg

Hi John, You'll want to enter the www.example.com in the campaign, so we crawl JUST the www subdomain. We don't often think of it this way, but www is a subdomain.

Hi! If you are a PRO Plus or PRO Elite customer, you can add your logo to PDF reports. It's covered in this help section at http://www.seomoz.org/help/campaign-setup and excerpted below: How do I add my logo or get white labeled reports? If you have our PRO Plus or PRO Elite, you can upload a logo from your campaign settings page. This will add your logo to the top of PDF reports downloaded from the web app. This is a great way to show off our excellent data with your awesome branding. Enjoy!

I have 2 free eBooks which got me to 9 on Google US for a secondary and 20 - 30 for my main primary keywords.  I'm new to SEO joined SEO moz abour 2 months ago. scribd dot com for example is Page and Domain Authority over 90, I've a link on there but I don't know if they give juice.  Free ebooks dot net have over 70 P and D authority. A free eBook you can use forever with no duplicate content issues becasue it's either downloaded or linked to your page to download (I might be wrong as the book description is the same).  Either way it gets me access to many places I would otherwise not get.  I've already been contacted by a charity (for children's literature) to use / link to one of them. While I was writing it I would never have dreamed to give it away for free so I put a lot of effort in at the time, it is 132 pages long (the guitar one).  If you're writing an eBook that you know will be free you have to make it good, like 50 pages, and good enough content that your link is merely informative.   Because I write books this suits me but if there's an area you are knowledgable about then it could be something to consider.

Hi David, OSE usually takes a few updates to include more recent links. Do not worry about the link not showing up in OSE, it doesn't mean you are not being considered by Google. OSE is just an FYI tool, and won't always be able to gather exactly all links.

Hello Sam. That doesn't sound like panda. If it was panda, you wouldn't be on page 1 for keywords, unless your keyword is the complete title and you are the only one with it. More likely is that your competitors have moved up and maybe some of the sites you dot links from have been destroyed or maybe they dropped their links that point to you, or maybe they made them nofollow. Dropping just a couple of positions would be a wonderful problem to have. If you haven't already done so, I suggest you work through the training, so you understand more, then use the tools in the "Research Tools" menu item at the top of the page.

There are some good points in the other answers, but honestly do the course. With all due respect a lot of what the other answers are covering is minor detail compared to the big picture stuff that you are missing.  You need to understand that stuff if you want your site to do better. Simply following check lists of technical issues will not get you the big jumps you probably want. The course will take you through the process.  It will help you understand how to identify the keywords that are going to bring you traffic, how to target those keywords effectively, how to spot the sort of issues that others are pointing out and how to build the authority you need to rank for those terms. I'm not knocking the points others have made. They're all good. However you really need to understand the basics properly and then come back and work through those sorts of points. The good news is though that if you are getting those traffic numbers from the site in it's current state it has potential. It should be well worth getting this stuff right.