These are directives for the crawlers, so I assume it will still work.
- SEO and Digital Marketing Q&A Forum
- William.Lau
William.Lau
@William.Lau
Job Title: SEO
Company: NYC
Website Description
Digital Marketing Manager
Favorite Thing about SEO
Exposure
Latest posts made by William.Lau
-
RE: Mobile update: referrer in alternate URL
-
RE: OSE not picking up all internal links?
OSE is not an end all be all for links. They only gather a certain number links and data.
You're already using screaming frog to get this data, so that should be accurate. You can also check Google Webmaster Tools, which has a section called "Internal Links".
-
RE: Thoughts on HARO (help a reporter out)
HARO shouldn't be your main link building strategy.
For me, I get the three mailings a day and typically reply to a request once a week or even none. One key success for using HARO is to make sure you actually have data and expertise when answering requests. Don't just answer them in hopes of getting a link, reporters/writers get boatloads of answers and if your answer isn't good enough they'll just move on to the next one.
Be specific and very detail oriented when sending out pitches. Those are the ones that get the highest response/success rate.
-
RE: Duplicate items across different pages?
Won't make a difference unless its within the body (my opinion).
I would also take note that the testimonials on your work/project page shouldn't be the bulk of the content on those pages. If they are just in a fixed location, that should be fine. Plus if they only appear the testimonial and work/project page, I wouldn't worry about it too much.
-
RE: What to do with blog pagination / categories
Google's fairly well at understanding pagination. You can either rel=canonical, rel next/prev or just simply leave them alone.
As for categories, i'd leave them as is, since you would typically want your categories to rank for the category keyword.
-
RE: How do you link a specific keyword to a landing page
I thought Roger was a male.
Keywords can be tied to a URL by either if it ranks or is the best matching URL for that keyword.
-
RE: Page Count in Webmaster Tools Index Status Versus Page Count in Webmaster Tools Sitemap
Noindexed pages should not appear in your "Index Status". I could be wrong but it doesn't make sense to appear there if the page is noindexed.
Doing a site:www.nyc-officespace-leader.com, I get 849 results. Seems normal to me. Again you would probably have to scrutinize your sitemap instead, sitemaps don't always pull all the URLs depending how on you get them.
Based on Screaming Frog, you got about 860 pages and ~200 noindexed pages. Your index status may update eventually.
Its working as is anyway, http://www.nyc-officespace-leader.com/blog/tag/manhattan-office-space
Does not show up in SERPs. I wouldn't use Index Status as definitive but more as directional.
-
RE: Page Count in Webmaster Tools Index Status Versus Page Count in Webmaster Tools Sitemap
Index status is how many pages Google has indexed of your site.
Sitemap is different, incase your site has pages that are too deep for Google to find, sitemaps are created as a way to direct Googlebot to crawl pages that they won't necessarily find.
In your case Google indexed more pages than the amount of pages in your sitemap, which is absolutely normal.
-
RE: Do you say Browser Title or Page Title?
Page Title is correct in all ways.
Browser Title is for the people that don't live/work in your industry.
Thats how I choose.
-
RE: Canonical Tag on All Pages
There isn't a major negative effect when using canonicals even when they are not needed. Some CMS use sitewide canonicals to easier tackle duplicate URLs. So if a base URL is using parameters, the CMS might have been setup to follow back to the canonical URL.
A quick example would be: view-source:http://www.expedia.com/
Best posts made by William.Lau
-
RE: Meta Keywords: Should we use them or not?
Meta keywords are no longer being used by most search engines, especially Google. I suggest removing all meta keyword data because the only thing it does is it allows competitors to see what keywords you are trying to target.
Most popular search engines don't use this to rank anymore, and it is best to not do this.
-
RE: What to do when I attain seoMoz Guru status
Irving you troll. You just wanted a thumbs up! (well you got it!)
Thanks for contributing to the awesome community.
I too am sad private Q&A is going away, I like to keep some questions private and keep certain sites private. But I hope this brings out more Moz associates to answer certain questions.
-
RE: SEO Fightback
Don't even need to look at their site. Best way to build link is doing it in house. Make fresh and intriguing content, and you will be surprised how much that will help.
Invest that $97 a month on building an awesome article/content(video) and you will get great backlinks. Its hard but once you get a hang of it, you will realize how easy it is, with the correct budget in building the content.
And once again, any of these "give me $10 and I'll give you 1 billion links" is just utter BS and bad for you and business.
This really makes our industry harder to teach individuals that it is not as simple as paying someone and they get you backlinks, and we have to reeducate them exactly why and what you should be doing instead of paying for links.
Also Google is known 100% to devalue and even penalize links in blog networks.
-
RE: How does WordPress 3.5.1 impact site rankings?
Having the site as the subfolder is good.
Any impact on rankings? What rankings are you referring to though?
Just because spammers use WP, Google doesn't view everyone using WP as spammers.
WP.org and WP.com are for different types of users and there are successful WP.com sites as well as WP.org and vice versa for spammers.
WP overall is a great CMS for blogging and managing content and I would recommend using them.
Just create awesome content, share, and create buzz, you will rank well.
-
Reconsideration Request a Success!
Hi all,
Well I've finally gotten been able to get the penalty removed judging by this email:
"Dear site owner or webmaster of xxx,
We received a request from a site owner to reconsider xxx for compliance with Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
Previously the webspam team had taken manual action on your site because we believed it violated our quality guidelines. After reviewing your reconsideration request, we have revoked this manual action. It may take some time before our indexing and ranking systems are updated to reflect the new status of your site.
Of course, there may be other issues with your site that could affect its ranking without a manual action by the webspam team. Google's computers determine the order of our search results using a series of formulas known as algorithms. We make hundreds of changes to our search algorithms each year, and we employ more than 200 different signals when ranking pages. As our algorithms change and as the web (including your site) changes, some fluctuation in ranking can happen as we make updates to present the best results to our users. If your site continues to have trouble in our search results, please see this article for help with diagnosing the issue.
Thank you for helping us to maintain the quality of our search results.
Sincerely,
Google Search Quality Team"
This was after a reconsideration request was sent prior to disavow tool being released. In addition I also applied a disavow of all the links I was unsuccessful in removingwithout contacting Google and letting the original reconsideration request run it's course.
I am making this post just to let everyone know that the hard work pays off and Google is just trying to make sure you are doing your best in removing the links. As 'Ryan Kent' always emphasizes, you must really be diligent and honest when trying to remove links. You also need to keep documentation, I anchored contact pages and email addresses, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and even 4th attempt dates.
Now with the disavow tool, I believe if you do a "good faith" in removing the links, and it is well documented, you can use the disavow tool after multiple attempts, correlating both the disavow links and the spreadsheet sent to Google is and should be very important in a reconsideration request.
Good luck!
Also I received the message from WMT, and wondering does anyone know how long is 'some time' before site is reindexed? So far our organic traffic is still about the same prior. So I would like to hear what other's experience are after a successful reconsideration.
Feel free to ask any questions!
-
RE: Checking available domain names with keywords
Use Keyword Tool,
Export all keywords to Excel.
Delimit text and put .coms for all of them.
Copy and paste to here.
http://www.domaintools.com/buy/availability-check/bulk/
Bulk check all the domains.
-
RE: What is the difference between "Referring Pages" and "Total Backlinks" [on Ahrefs]?
Referring pages is the amount of pages (URLS) pointing to your site.
Total backlinks is the total amount of links you have to your site.
Example: 10 pages have 2 links to your site.
Referring Pages: 10
Total Backlinks: 20 -
RE: Why is the weekly rankings report often inaccurate?
That is not the problem, Moz rank checker is often done at random times and at any given time a keyword could not be ranking.
I'm pretty sure Moz crawls pages with personalization off (pws=0). For instance I use to do freelance for http://www.canvaspaintings.com and they rank #1 for "canvas paintings", however sometimes they would not even appear in the top 100.
If Moz often gives the keyword the wrong ranking, you should follow up with them. If this happens maybe one or twice, it should not be a big problem. Just know that you are ranking.
-
RE: 1 Blog or Multiple Blogs?
1 Blog. Google loves fresh content. Different blogs will be updated less frequently but if one blog, it will be fresh.
Generally speaking though, 1 blog is always better if its the same owner unless its a complete different niche/market. You are able to build links easier and domain can be more authoritative. Because it is the same or similar market, its best to keep it all in one place, your traffic or performance will be better.
-
RE: Does social media work with boring clients?
A lot of different niche's don't necessarily benefit from social media but as mentioned previous it is still good to have them. You need a platform to keep customers/users updated when things happen, such as site going down, press information, and relations.
Social media has a wide range of platforms, and it will most likely take time to find out which platform is most beneficial. Google+, Facebook, Twitter are usually obvious pluses, but I noticed LinkedIn works very well for a lot of these businesses.
LinkedIn is extremely good at connecting B2B relations.
Always learning.