Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Ryan, I'm pretty sure that SEM Rush does provide historical data, you just need to purchase the GURU or higher plan in order to gain access to this. You're right about Compete - and it is only limited to the US.

Hey Lawrence, Thanks for the heads up - I read the question too fast and missed the root domain. I've edited my answer to reflect this. Cheers.

I did receive the email.  However, I never saw the the "Mark as Answered" button so I just marked GOOD ANSWER.  Hope this helps...

We had a similar problem we thought with duplicates after placing canonical tags on all our pages. Moz took about a week as did Woorank to update and decide the canonicals were in place and showing no duplicate content. We have a fairly small site with a little under 100 pages but this was a significant amount of work inserting the canonical tags and we were a little worried initially that they continued to show as duplicates for a short time. Gary

Hi Alex, Did any of these responses answer your question? If so, please mark one or more as a "good answer." Thanks! Christy

Hi there! Thank you so much for reaching out! We're currently working on a monthly reporting feature that might offer the additional timeframe options you're looking for. However...I don't have an ETA on this feature, nor am I sure that it will be exactly what you're looking for. The good news is we have an outlet for great ideas like this! I'd love to point you to our Feature Request Forum! https://seomoz.zendesk.com/forums/293194-Moz-Feature-Requests You can post feature requests in this forum so our product team can review them and let you know if and when we can bake them in! I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions! Cheers! Erin P.S. I personally don't have any tutorials for transforming CSV's into lovely graphs, but I'm sure someone here does!

I'm not familiar with CodeIgniter, but this isn't terribly different from how Wordpress and other PHP-based CMSs manage permalinks. Currently you're simply forwarding shortened URLs (/contact/) to the actual URL (/site/contact/), which isn't ideal. It would be preferable to remove the base path (/site/) from the URL completely. This guide (http://www.web-and-development.com/codeigniter-remove-index-php-minimize-url/) has a good rundown on how to control this in .htaccess. I believe that the sections titled "Removing 1st URL segment" and "Routing automatically" are going to be the ones that are applicable to your case, because you're trying to change the controller. You should also take a look through the original documentation at http://ellislab.com/codeigniter/user-guide/general/urls.html. You're also going to want to make sure that any canonicals being used in the match the intended URL, and that any incorrect URLs (eg /site/contact/) are 301 redirecting to the proper URL (eg /contact/). Use wheregoes.com and type in the /site/contact/ version of the URL to test this - it should spit out "301 redirect" not "302" or anything else. If you're not really comfortable messing around with htaccess, I'd highly recommend trying this out on a development server and making sure it all works correctly before you move it to a live server.

Best way to find the lost links is Ahrefs.com that will show you the data of lost links within the index or Majestic SEO that will show you what links are now deleted. Hope this helps!

You are very welcome! Our product team has already commented and it looks like we will be working on making this change down the line.

If you filter and show only cells that have been formatted a particular way, say red, all you should have to do is copy and paste the results into a new column. Then you should be able to find and replace the city state with nothing once. That should yield your root keyword list. Just make a copy and delete the other columns if they're presenting an issue.

I think I misunderstood - I thought you were reporting an issue with the MozBar, but it sounds like you are asking for advice on an issue that surfaced through the MozBar.  I will let you guys figure it out from here!

Most cases like these are catered for on an adhoc basis, usually done by a dev team that will migrate the entire database into the new site. There could well be a market for a porting tool that provides a checklist type system for a large scale site migration. I have seen site migrations go wrong. A lot of revenue can be lost through the plummet of organic traffic from a failed migration.

I'm pretty sure if you just chop off the last tag, , you are going to be perfectly fine. There should be one canonical tag and it should point to the URL of the original document or the version that you want search engines to view as the main document.

Talked to Dr. Matt, and he said that, if you just want an estimate, take the log (base 10). You'll get a value from zero to two that will be roughly linear, and then you can scale it up to whatever range you need.

Hi Hardley, I'd recommend using the search operators that Moz has built into Fresh Web Explorer (see attached). Adding quotation marks around your brand name will likely narrow down the results. Hope this helps! Tim YVIg0ob

S_Curtis is correct Your actually lucky, my "not provided" is closer to 90%

Not a problem, please mark the question as answered. It keeps the forums neater. If you have already done so, thank you. The site appears to be experiencing some problems today.

I submitted my site using GWT Fetch as Google feature. I understand that it takes time. Does Google prevent new domains from figuring in the search results ? It doesn't bother me since the site is just 12 days old. But i want to make sure i do it right so that eventually Google will send me search traffic.

Very nice the extensión on google chrome Davinia althoght just give the links paga by page with is arder on bif websites with tousands of pages. Webmaster tools tells you where are the bad links coming from although sometimes that link as already been fixed before by you. If you are using wordpress, than i think broken ink checker will be the best way to detect and correct the broken links in the same plugin

The Open Site Explorer indexed is completely refreshed every few weeks, and currently consists of 105 billion links. While that's quite a large data set and mostly comparable with other indexes in the space, it's still only a fraction of the links on the web and only a portion of the links Google undoubtedly knows about. The way OSE finds links is that it prioritizes pages with lots of inbound links and links it found during previous crawls. Because BBB pages are often found deep-deep-deep under layers of navigation and usually don't have a lot of external links pointing to them, they aren't easy pages for crawlers to find on a regular basis. BBB has an especially difficult site architecture, and sadly this issue comes up a lot with that particular site We're working on including more historical data in the index, so that even if we didn't crawl the link in the past two weeks, we'll still include it if we are reasonably confident it still exist. This will help alleviate some of these concerns. The good news (or bad depending on how you look at it) is that while OSE doesn't show every link, it tends to show the majority of the most valuable links. Regardless, thanks for the feedback and best of luck with your SEO.