Welcome to the Q&A Forum

There is also information on internal links in Google Webmaster Tools; under "Search Traffic" in the left column, choose "Internal Links."

I am actually seeing that after a delay the rankings have rebounded and now are higher than before.   The backlinks are now again showing up in GWT.  I still think that the warning from Google and temporary drop are connected, but I guess in the long term it really doesnt matter.

Thank you so much Takeshi and Mike! I will place the badge into sidebar rather. What do you mean Mike by "have no redirection and allow sharing, liking, and tweeting directly from the page without taking you off the page" How can influence this, I though the badge is badge. Does it have some special settings fro this? Can you please advice me how can I make sure I follow ll these rules please? Thank you very much and and have nice evening, Best wishes Iris

There was a similar question posted earlier. Go down to the Question "Unknown Links" and someone left a great answer

A few points. 1. Make absolute sure your site is clear of Malware. Check Google Webmaster Tools and I also recommend running your URL through the Securi checker  (the scan is free, and the service is worth it if you were hit) http://sucuri.net/ 2. After a malware hit, Google recommends you use the "Crawl as Googlebot" in Google Webmaster Tools and then select "Submit this page and all linked pages to Index" option. 3. Make sure your sitemaps are up to date and properly submitted via Google Webmaster Tools. 4. I did notice in your question that you disavowed links. If you disavowed links that were actually helping you this could have had a negative effect on your rankings. Unfortunately, I don't know of a way to get these back. It's possible your drop has nothing to do with the Malware - it could be just an unfortunate coincidence. Do a site audit, check your crawl errors, try to match your traffic drop against known Google updates, and stay vigilant about improving your content and outreach. No definite answers here, but I hope this background helps. Best of luck with your site!

Hi Martijn, Thank you very much for your reply. It is realy weird:-( I guess I attract this kind of weird staff perhaps somebody can still advice?

Hello Abe, The campain in question is the digital discovery | Agencia. Do you need more detaisl? Can you give me another way to contact you? My regards, Pedro M Pereira

Hi there! I'm going to go ahead and marks this as answered since we took care of this in the support queue. For any others that are curious though, You can always add allow/disallow directives for Roger in your robots.txt. I recommend taking a look at our Help Hub for more info Thanks! Sam Moz Helpster

Takeshi thank you for the reply.

Great, thanks so much!

Wow. I wasn't expecting such a detailed and awesome answer Danny. Thanks so much, I'm in the process of migrating away from S3 anyways (for other reasons) though you're right in that I'm going to miss the cost & load times. I'm using Middleman for now, though the technical part of my brain is indeed interested in how you're going to accomplish the Jekyll solution. I'll look out for your post! And thanks for the tip on my site. Another thing to add to the list Arun

Search engines and informed individuals are used to ?'s as like Takeshi said "query parameters" or "query variables". For everyone else it might look "questionable" (Sorry just had to say it )

I'd have to agree with Peter here, this sounds like a very risky option. Google can and will pick up on link networks which most automated link software work from. May work short term but eventually this sort of practice could end in a Google Penalty.

Thank you polarking, I'll keep that in mind as I progress. Appreciate it!

Hi There I am not seeing any sex titles, where exactly are these showing up, in Google search results? Are you on Google.com or a different country? I don't see an issue with the replytocom since there is a canonical tag on that page pointing back to the original URL, so you should be all set there! -Dan

Hi! Did you solve the issue you asked about in your question, so to consider this Q&A closed? Or you are still wondering about an answer? In this last case, please, give us more details answering to the clarifications I asked you one month ago :). Ciao

Hi there, Thanks for reaching out! Your campaigns are actually not gone. Anytime a subscription is cancelled or suspended, any active campaigns are moved to an archived status. This preserves their historic data and allows them to be reactivated later. We found a bug that is preventing archived campaigns from showing up in the UI and have a fix deploying that should resolve this soon, but I do have a workaround for you in the interim. After you log into Moz, type in: pro.moz.com/campaigns in your browser navigation window. This will take you to the archived campaigns. From there, just click on the Activate button next to the ones you want to bring back. Sorry for the confusion here and let me know if there's anything else I can help with. Have a great day! Best, Sam Moz Helpster

Hey Olivier, You could detect the user agent and hide the button. The difference isn't substantial enough to be called cloaking. Or you could make the button not actually a button tag, but another tag with that traps clicks with a JS event. I'm not sure Google's headless browser is smart enough to automate that. I would try this first and if it doesn't work switch to the user agent detection idea. Let us know how it goes! -Mike