Welcome to the Q&A Forum

hi, You can try these tools: https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/ https://www.pingdom.com/ https://gtmetrix.com/ https://www.dareboost.com/en regards

Hey! Your exports will be sent to the notification center where they can be downloaded. https://moz.com/notifications If you are having issues with getting reports sent to the notification center, please contact us at help@moz.com thanks!

The key to these type of projects of the quality of the traffic, your question involved several fields but as I see just one simple goal which is to make your site profitable. Keep in mind that the key on every PPC campaign is segmentation, not all the traffic is useful and not all the keywords are useful so the first thing to check is your PPC campaign and most important your funnels GTmetrix score is not relevant in other to make sales, Google Suggest to optimize the user experience and that is an SEO requirement in order to rank a website/page (in your case I should focus on your conversions rather than performance) I will strongly suggest you add  a **cart abandon Opt-in **please check the article it will give some interesting ideas Also, I will strongly suggest you integrate a Popup in your website to collect emails and of course create an email campaign check this example https://www.jomashop.com/ A retargeting campaign will be also useful I hope these advice help you Regards

Hi there! Sam from Moz's Help Team here! If you could  pop an email about this over to help@moz.com, that  would be great - our team will be happy to help there. Thank  you!

Hi there! Sam from Moz's Help Team here! If you could  pop an email about this over to help@moz.com, that  would be great - our team will be happy to help there. Thank  you!

Thank you very much everyone for your answers. They were very insightful. Took away a couple things that I did not implement. This biggest thing I need to completely understand is: If there are any SEO practices implemented in the franchisees page Ex:  website.com/west-palm-beach any efforts are not stiffened because the SEO was not implemented on  website.com but was instead implemented in /west-palm-beach (subfolder)

My preference would be the UTM tagging as I find it easier later on down the line when it comes to reporting & tracking

Hi The seo implications can be significant. The first step is to audit - search console probably easiest the organic traffic hitting that exact page.  The value of the page determines the content changes you may consider. Thus if a page is ranking very well for a high-value target then the changes we recommend would be minimal, primarily CX focussed - enhance value. Enjoy no duplication, and not over optimised. If the page is a poor performer with limited or no organic traffic, then there is little to no risk in a full content change.  If that is the case, do whatever you like... to improve the value of the page.  The only element to monitor is internal links from that page, again measure impact and audit. Hope that helps.

Hi there! Thanks so much for the great question! Sorry for the confusion here. This alert means that at the time we last crawled freexy.net it was redirecting to youlovelife.com/?domain=freexy.net. When querying a site in Link Explorer, it is not a live check of that site so if this redirect has been updated or removed since the last time we crawled it for our index, this will not be reflected in the tool until we crawl it next. Once we recrawl freexy.net and don't see that redirect, this notice will be removed. I hope this helps to clarify! If you have further questions, feel free to email us at help@moz.com.

That is not true at all, Klaver, just as Kenn Gold just proved in his answer above. I just searched for "seo tips" and found that both Neil Patel and Backlinko have videos in the video carousel and have a page ranking in the top ten as well. Neil Patel also has the featured snippet at the top of the page as well.

Unless I've misunderstood, I'm not sure that aria-hidden is going to be able to deliver what you are looking to do - I don't think you can use it to hide the alt attribute of the image without hiding the image as well. If you mean adding non-alt-attribute text to the page so that it is visible to sighted users, I would expect that it would make sense to keep that accessible to screen readers as well - it should be useful to all kinds of site visitor, I would have thought. In general, I would tend to suggest that alt attributes should primarily be used for their intended accessibility purpose, and that this should tend to include more valuable content on the page which the search engines may find useful. I found this guide to be one of the best I have seen on the subject. As a sidenote, I tend to think alt attributes are over-rated for SEO purposes anyway. In our testing, we have not yet detected a statistically significant uplift from adding alt attributes to images that did not previously have them. Good luck!

Thank you!

No-followed links don't usually pass SEO authority across, negative or positive. Unless you begin to notice a specific and isolated impact on related rankings, I honestly wouldn't worry too much. No-followed links usually don't affect SEO (period) You could always just disavow the domain(s) if you really wanted to, then even if they removed the no-follow tags you'd still be unaffected. In my opinion I wouldn't do anything if the links are all 100% no-followed anyway

That is correct, final input would be 'how popular the content becomes', e.g backlinks target what you will write about write well if it's good enough, links spawn SEO growth By the way, sometimes you have to write hundreds of posts before one gets picked up. But when it does (in a big way), you really do see the benefit

That is exactly correct. Searchers are not using symbols in their search, so it's much more practical to optimize for 3/4, 1/2, or half inch (as the keyword research suggests) rather than these fractional symbols because they are impossible (?) for users to generate using a standard keyboard. Especially if products are unusual sizes like 8/11 or 3/16.

Any time you initiate a crawl, it counts against your limits, even if something on the site is blocking us from crawling it. I would suggest that write into help@moz.com so we can help you diagnose what is blocking us from crawling your site.

AFAIK since the way images are used online hasn't 'significantly' changed in decades (as Zohaib says) - there is no factual industry standard. But this technique seems like it could yield faster page-loading speeds for mobile, which we all know Google does stand behind. Google often come up with an error on Page Speed insights which says, you are serving massive resolution images with a tiny viewport. They actually can and do regard that as an error, so surely if Google documents that the technique is acceptable to them and we know it solves certain issues, it is at least 'worth a try' IMO