Welcome to the Q&A Forum

CTA's in MD's work, so we use them often, but usually at the end.  So a full MD with details about the page and then a CTA at the end.  "Contact us today for a free Quote" etc.  But I agree with Joe I also try and use the targetted customer query once in the MD together with synonyms if it works... Hope that assists.

No worries, you often get the weekly dips when global - no idea why. However, when adding country it all flattens out.  If the question is answered or happy please mark it accordingly.  Hope that helps.

Vrey good http://puzzlchat.ir/

Hi there! We'd be more than happy to look into this for you. Can you please send an email in to help@moz.com with the page and keyword you're testing? Thanks so much!

Ugh. Yeah - sorry - no more bright ideas forthcoming from our side. I think you have a clear-eyed view of the risks and difficulties of the different options. Sorry I don't have anything more substantial for you. Good luck!

Just here to add some to Will almost complete answer: The 'site:' often shows results that won't be displayed in Google search results and don't represent the entirely nor precisely the pages that are indexed. I'd suggest to you: 1- If those pages are already serving 404 or 410, then wait for a little. Google won't show them in search results and eventually won't be seen in a site: search. You can check whether those URLs are being shown in searches through search console. 2- There is a script made by a webmaster that helps you using the GSC URL removal tool for a big list of URLs. Please, use it carefully and try it first within a riskless GSC property Hope it helps. Best luck. Gaston

Sorry I have to check if I can find screenshots of it, but it was just an image right bottom linking to a subdomain, looking like a chat..

Eugh, sounds frustrating and I understand your reaction, good luck with the grind!

Yep. Sounds about right to me. I'd also check the relationship of their content to your client's industry. The more relevant the better. If you're paying for it, I'd also request they use specific SEO-friendly anchor text. _Ex: rather than hyperlinking the root domain (prisonconsultants.co.uk) would be better to hyperlink 'UK prison consultants' or something similar. _

Also see: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnrampton/2017/11/06/the-difference-between-nofollow-and-noreferrer-and-why-it-matters/#32e295f11e06 There are tracking implications, meaning traffic will come through as 'direct' source in GA instead of from the referring domain, but does not seem to impact SEO.

Hi udaipabla, You should always point your links to the final version you show users. In this case, you have all 3 redirected to https://www.remotebaba.com, then that should be the URL. The thinking here is to be coherent on what you tell Users, other webs and Google. Don't waste Google's time making it go through redirections whenever you can avoid it. Hope it helps. Best luck. Gaston

Sitemaps cannot (should not) contain more than 50,000 URLs: https://www.sitemaps.org/faq.html#faq_sitemap_size I'd recommend you instead create a sitemap index to house multiple sitemap files. Keep in mind you will need to separate the URLs in them in order to represent all 60K URLs you have in your existing sitemap. Separately, EGOL makes excellent points: sitemaps aren't the only way to get pages indexed. It's entirely possible that you do not have sufficient internal links that aid crawlers' discovery of your content: https://moz.com/learn/seo/internal-link You may also have directives (e.g. noindex) on certain pages or in your robots.txt that prevents crawlers from crawling and indexing certain parts of your site. It may be time for a technical audit: https://www.distilled.net/technical-seo-audit-checklist/

Yes absolutely. I'm sorry if my answer wasn't clear on that point but yes it's almost always better for rankings to have more internal links pointing to pages and if it's better for users too, then it's the best move all around.

Hi, I can not see the images you attach. If you can attach the web address maybe I can help you. Regards

All great points, Andreas, and thanks for sharing that resource with Ty1986. I just want to call out user expectation (and ultimately user experience): our expectation is that faceted navigation narrows or alters content on a page. Users _expect _to see this in an easy-to-find place, such as above or to the left of the content the facets will alter. Unless you're proposing a sticky footer-style faceted nav (one that follows the user as they scroll), I encourage you not to use your footer for facets.

Hi, IMO you should disavow them  just to be safe. Thanks

Hey there! Thanks for reaching out to us! Unfortunately you cannot change that directly within Link Explorer, however, you can search for UK Keywords based on your website within Keyword Explorer. We have a great guide here: https://moz.com/help/keyword-explorer/keyword-research/ranking-keywords Feel free to reach out to help@moz.com if you have any further questions, Eli

To me, this idea sounded weird and you have confirmed what I was thinking. Thank you.