Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks for your response. I was beginning to think this question had been left to rot. I'm not getting any errors in WMT. What is concerning is that Roger is returning almost 300 errors of dupe content, which is obviously a problem. Screaming frog is no longer finding the pages (they've been blocked in the robot.txt) I guess what I'm trying to ask here is how can I be sure that my dupe content has been effectively blocked from google's spider. Is there anyway to check? Thanks for your help.

I ended up going with BrightLocal and, while they do provide a lot of the data I needed, aggregating it can be difficult without dedicated support on the BrightLocal side.

Hi There, Thanks for writing in. It is a bit difficult to determine exactly what may be the issue without knowing what site you are exporting the research for, but there are a couple of reasons the titles may be different. The data we provide can be a few weeks old, so the site may have changed the titles of their pages since they were indexed. Also, the pages could redirect to a different page than where the link was originally located when we indexed the page. We just released a new index this morning, so you may want to try running your report again. If you are still seeing errors for the page titles, it will help us investigate if you can let me know the site you are research and several examples of titles that seem off. If you prefer not to provide that data in the public forum, you can email us at help@moz.com. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you are still running into any issues with the updated data. Chiaryn Help Team Ninja

I'm not sure what you mean by "removed them from your blog," since most blogs have categories and tags to help with internal navigation and organization. It may be that they are still in your sitemap; so check your sitemap.  The other issue is time.  It takes awhile for spiders to catch-up with your site.

I don't believe anything like that currently exists.

Hello  and thanks for reaching out to us! If the fix listed below by Bas_Linders does not work, please email this report  with the description of your issue to help@moz.com. We would love to find the cause of your CSV issues. Sorry for the inconveniences that you are experiencing.

sounds right,  OSE does not get all links, I have found links it has missed a few in the past (normally low DA sites) or it might take 2 crawls before it picks it up.  If its still missing after the next crawl or too, might be worth reporting (since it a big PA backlink)

In (very) short, "Seo"  does not cover all what Moz now does, it has expanded from that. (+ there are other reasons, see article above)

Yup and you can set up up to three search engines.

It's hard to predict Google rankings, and there's no one metric that can do this reliably. The best we have to go on are metrics that correlate well with ranking potential. As of May 31, 2013, here's how the following correlated with Google rankings for US search results: Page Authority - 0.36 Domain Authority - 0.19 MozRank - 0.24 Linking Root Domains - 0.30 Total Links - 0.25 External Links - 0.29 So Page Authority is the highest correlated metric that we know of - beating Google's PageRank by a wide margin. But as Chris points out, this is only a predictive metric. And while a 0.36 correlation is awesome in the SEO world, it's still a long way from a perfect correlation. For more historical correlation data, I highly recommend looking at the 2011 Ranking Factors (we'll be updating this soon) Generally, most SEOs have to take a number of metrics and data into account when trying to figure out the ranking potential of a webpage, and it's incredibly hard to create a computer model to replicate this. Regardless, I hope this helps! Best of luck with your SEO.

I agree it's a strange setup and also suspected it would be ignored. I appreciate the answers and will see if there is a way to hardcode a way out of it.

The link you provided still works, it's just redirected to http://pro.moz.com/tools/crawl-test

Thanks a lot for this, Robert. It really helps.

Hi there! Thanks for reaching out to us!  You can actually have your campaign send you a report of your highest ranked keywords by creating a custom report.  To learn how to do that, simply head to our fabulous help hub page below: Moz.com/help/custom-reports Thanks again for being a supporter of Moz, please let us know if you have any questions... I'm here to help. Best, Peter Moz Help Team.

Thanks everyone, I sent an email to my developer and seo team yesterday and it seems it is being indexed again now, I was checking via Google.co.uk. I'm still feeling that something is not right because my enquiries have stopped completely and sales are right down but i guess with the drastic seo changes going on this was bound to happen. Also my analytic queries have gone down from 1000 to 400 so it is probably that this is affecting it too. SEO is the most frustrating thing I have had to deal with, there are just so many different elements involved in getting it right

Hello, ty again for reply. Yep, i understand about links right now. Patience is not my point... but i have to be patient. Yes i already pay at Adwords ... for a beginner store i had 4 conversions in a single day. But ... traffic is 250 unique visitor MAX ! You have any advice to increase Traffic but keep conversion up ? Facebook is UN-TARGETED , Facebook is 0 from my point of view. They enter .... they press like or not, .... and they leave. No conversions. Like they saw a picture .... :))) Facebook is not a good tool for making Right business. At last in Romania. Twitter = 0, Romania is low on twitter Pinterest = 0, Romania is it in east of Europe, it was a country under communist politics until 1990... most of people are not open mind.  Like a study my clients are all 18 - 35 .... few clients over 40 years old. In Romania, Online Commerce is 3%, and Facebook users only 6 M, instead of 12 M at google. Thank you again.

The report we're referring to is the one that is access through the "Research Tools". It is no longer listed there now but you can access it through http://pro.moz.com/tools/crawl-test It provides a quick crawl of any site (up to 3000 pages). Very good tool if you don't have a week to wait for Roger to do a complete crawl. I use it all the time for Biz Dev work. Hope this helps.

Just watched that video - I've been talking about that for years.  If you do RCS you'll engage with your customers and they'll do the link building for you. My interested is in getting moz to work for me as opposed to me woring for him LOL

It seems Moz completed the required engineering work and the index will build up in the upcoming months.  https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/20770156-open-site-explorer-to-crawl-https [quote] Hi RKG-Dev - When we release this you will be able to retrieve https URLs and associated metrics from the API in the same way you currently retrieve http metrics. We will be crawling https URLs at the same time we crawl http URLs so they will be available on the same dates. April 26, 2013 01:50 pm [/quote] [quote] As I understand it, the HTTPS crawl data will work it's way into the indexes iteratively over time, and this should start in one of the next few indexes. This means that we should have better and better secure site representation over the next few months.  I'll try and keep this thread posted as we see uptake with this. With regard to the SERP analysis reports, if you are asking about metrics for https pages, this will come along for the ride, as will access via the API, campaigns, and OSE. May 02, 2013 07:40 am [/quote]

Hi Dave, I assume you are talking about webnames.ca, in which case if you drop the url for the press_releases into screaming frog then you see a whole bunch of 302's to an error page. I had a quick look and could not see an obvious link that was spawning these but something must be in there if both tools are seeing it. Most obvious thing would probably be a relative link (so like href="/default.aspx") maybe in one of the press releases themselves since your main menu items at first glance look ok. If you export the errors list from moz and filter for the 302s, then the referring page shown in the far right column in combination with the error page shown in the first column might help track down the place where the whole thing starts off. Tracking down the link(s) causing these kind of issues can be a real pain sometimes! Hope that helps!