Welcome to the Q&A Forum

For Linkearning you need content wich is readable/shareable/linkable - really great stuff with a lot of value for others, without great content it is a Mission Impossible. So if thats part of your "onpage" - you need great value to share with the right people.

It's hard to answer this question, we don't really know how far u are and what you exactly mean with onpage or what the site's content is.
I think Links to products are pretty hard to get. You need content round about your products, linking to them. Outreach for Links to products could make you sad and depressive ...

PS: I think Rands last WBF helps a lot in saving time by do outreach in a better way: https://moz.com/blog/link-building-outreach-in-a-skeptical-world-whiteboard-friday

Sounds like you have an mobile optimized Website (responsive, correct redirects, somthing like that) or your website has a pretty good User-Experience when it is used on mobile and some of your competitors don't.

For more Tipps we need more details

Wayback machine told me the wedding-dresses existed before, but the menu made me think it could be, that wedding_dresses was the url before. You are right Matt.

Waybackmachine says it is really the same url... hmmm. I don't know the answer, I don't know how PA is calculated
but I wanted to say:  the menu is to long for me, the last item (new arrivals) is in a new row and not readable (white text on pretty white back) - in Google Chrome & Firefox - thats nothing what could help at your problem, but I think you should take a look at it.

He's talking about Page Autority not PageRank I guess.

thats what I prefer to do - describe the image with the alt tag.
When you can use the target Keyword (in step by step instruction you surely could find ways) do it, but describe the image first.

I watched both pages now and what I can say is - I like your page more
I love that the first four results don not use that title: "tiny house trailer"

I really think you are a lot better in a lot of things - I checked a bit, I found a lot of duplicate content - Aaron Gray hint with copyscape was a good one It's also the same image, that could be a reason

http://www.copyscape.com/view.php?o=31218&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tinyhomebuildingcompany.com%2Fplans---trailers.html&t=1443515521&s=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tinyhomebuilders.com%2Ftiny-house-trailers&w=123&i=1&r=1

If that's exactly the code - it is not a link, it's a mention of your site. A link is something like:

anchor

Theories exists, that it could count - but to answer the question, I think it do not count and you don't get linkjuice  
If you can see, that you get a lot of more direct traffic it may work for you, it wont hurt.

just to be sure - that all the domains "seem to be de-indexed" includes the one in question?

32 Redirects shouldn't be a problem. The domains with 301 couldn't be indexed - they are pointing to another location. Thats the same for 302, the question is the duplicate content. I have seen a lot of sites with duplicate content (means here really everything, content, style, etc.) and google just picked up one and indexed that one - not one other of the duplicates. One time it starts to de-index the indexed one and indexed another domain (thats another story) - I never saw 2 pages with the same content and style indexed at the same time in that case. The only problem should be, if you have duplicate content on a completly different site - different pages, different style, a.s.o. -> a "competitor" made by yourselfe. I never saw google de-indexing a site for that, but goggle ranked them lower and lower and lower.

If all pages are de-indexed I would guess there are more problems. If the one domain in question is still indexed, I would say thats how it should be.

Hi Isaac,

You get the link juice (if it's a followed link oc) but wordpress is working with subdoamains. The blog is not www.wordpress.com/bloggersitename - it is bloggersitename.wordpress.de (check that site:www.wordpress.com and site:wordpress.com in google).

You can check the Subdomain Autority and Trust using the moztoolbar. For Searchengines a subdomain is like a new domain. They don't have a special bonus because it is wordpress.com.

You don't have a benefit with a new domain or subdomain at the start (without some myth I never saw) - but in future: a link of a former new domain to the old B2B site would be worth more, than a link from a subdomain or folder. Its a benefit for the old B2B site (when u link to it and that will happen several times) - the new B2C site is hard work

A: Subdomain: I think to take the subdomain is pretty useless - it is just like a new domain. May be worther (internal links b2b-b2c)

B: Subfolder: Of course you have a bonus in that case, the growth potential shouldn't be limited that much, as long as you won't chose the old CMS (you wrote that you wont).

A new site: I would try that way (but that is my liking). I would Link both sites to each other where ever (natural and relevant) possible. The way for the B2C site is long, in both ways B or C, but in case C, you can link back to the B2B site, so the old site can benefit. There are so many opportunities. I think it should be also possible to link them sitewide, I guess Google wouldn't see that as a manipulative linkbuilding. To much fear? Ask John Mueller in a webmaster hangout for his best practice tipps.

ok, that would be my choice. But one thing is clear, A is not really an option wich brings you in a better position from start up.

Maybe it is also possible to do a donation page on the domain like Patrick said (whats a great idea) and get a frame/ iframe of the donation form onto that page?

Sorry Alan allreay said it =( 
Maybe I should read all comments

I never tried it, but I would guess that Google wouldn't create sitelinks wich are directed to another domain in any way.
I think the only solution is a donation form on the working domain.

I think you can also take a look at this WBF... (comment marketing as inbound tactic)
Moosa Hemani is right
A friend came up with the same question, maybe the dofollow blog has an "nofollow" Meta Tag? His "dofollow" Blog had a index, nofollow robots-meta-tag.
I wouldn't comment for dofollow Links...

For me it sometimes take a bit longer until -- % changes into a value
Sometimes 30 - 60 seconds

I only know clients wich are using ssl since google considers it.
I have some insights to these sight, there ist no visible change in traffic or ranking.

It is not better, but its also not worser (but implemention is done right, I read that here over 60%
do it in a wrong way). What I mean - done wrong may be bad for your ranking.

of course he could use the robots.txt
Yoast may be the easiest way (but exactly that point sometimes isn't working - depends on installed plugins)

I would simply ad noindex in taxonomy (tag) - easy done with yoast, otherwise edit header.php and ask if is tag, than noindex meta tag. I guess it is Wordpress

as german it was pretty easy for me to find you under these german words, google is sending me there: afrofood.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/XHwco/ But the side ist redirecting me to: www.fundraising-kooperative.de/canada-goose-c-741/

_BUT only in SERPS - open that url in your browser and you will see the problem: http://afrofood.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/XHwco/_

into your 2014 uploads folder is a complete german website uploaded and indexed.

_http://afrofood.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/ _