Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I don't know what the futur will bring, the authorship could still do a job you need to care about. Maybe Authorship will never be a rankingfactor, but that may not be necessary. Maybe it was never a plan - who knows.

I think you can read that article written by Eric Enge on searchengineland.com/authorship-dead-long-live-authorship

he said "in crawl error section" and I thought "fetch as google section" My fault

answer:
I checked your page with "Xenu", there are a few 404 Links (mostly design gif's/css like this wp-content/themes/CHC/css/template_css.css) your internal links seem to be correct (200), the sitemap is correct too. So only external links (backlinks) can be the reason for the links, or an former sitemap.

Check where the google WMT thinks the url's where linked from (in crawl error section) - I would bet you can mark them all as "solved"

thats not the answer:
dont fetch:_ http://www.cancerhealercenter.com/blogs/the-next-big-thing-immunotherapy/_ as google, just fetch: blogs/the-next-big-thing-immunotherapy/ - the domain is added automaticly, included the "/" at the end.

If you have redirected the URLs correctly you should fatch the homepage as Google in WMT and send them including all refereing links. the new URLs are pretty fast in SERPs than.

The rest is like Ryan Purkey said - thumb up

Hi Ralph - I am german to, so would you tell me the target city that i can take a look at the SERP?

Competitors are seaching a lot but not clicking <- yes a lot, special SEO Berlin etc. ectremly. I asked some SEOs here in Berlin. Search it x-times a day

title isn't boring - the #newland factor we have, let people klick nearly everything, sad but true. "SEO | SEO | SEO & SEO" would be klicked if its on P1.

One thing, with our local 7 box and the max. 3 results above, when the local 7 box is shown a lot of people think "all above is adwords" . I testet ist with nearly 100 people, 30 thought its adwords, 20 just clicked adwords cause it looks so clickable

I am suprised that there is an heading called "price" - consequently there shoulld stay "Sobha Aspirational Homes Price". That really does not mean you should do that!

For me it looks like a lot "Sobha Aspirational Homes" and a bit "coming soon". I think that could be to much. I don't know when I last found a site in google, when I searched for a keyword phrase, wich has the exact phrase in so many headings and alt-tags. It looks to me like you have made the site for a google bot, but not for me.

One funny thing is, this Q+A allready is ranked better in google.de. And each website on page one looks a lot more natural to me.

By the way: Sobha greenacres (the .com site in the footer) is linked with "Sobha Aspirational Homes" - thats not what you wanted to do I am sure.

I think you could have is the following problem:

You got a Domain wich earned Links bevore and these Links are still out there. Google can see them and you will again and again see them in WMT. 
You cant just say solved and than they are gone, caused by the backlinks. They come again. 
Check that in WMT - I dont know how it is called in english versions (I just see the german), you can click on the 404 and than take a look at "what is linking to that page"
An easy solution in that case may be to disallow "/fs" for bots. (if you dont use fs in your url structure)

You shouldn't focus on PR because you don't know him. The PR value we see is last updated in December 2013, over one year old. And Google wouldn't update it again. So don't take PR as goal, would be a bit frusttrating, it wont change.

Take a look at your rankings, organic traffics or - if you want a value depending on links - Domain Authority / Page Authority/ Citation / MozTrust / ... - whatever.

BTW, I really love that google doesn't show us updates of PR, just because a lot of SEOs (and also some clients) I know focused to much on that little number. Thats a wrong way.

@number one: I think there was a time, where we made multi-language websites and where we directed the user (like you via 302) to his language. It is not the best way, which language speaks that google bot? 
I would say here you can find some answers: http://moz.com/learn/seo/international-seo

@3: I would say social shares and likes (no matter what social network) doesn't has an impact in google ranking. Ok google plus can be seen in SERPs when you are locked in ... but thats all. 
Of course websites with a lot af social activity often rank well, but thats correlation not causation. I mean, your social follower may build links, blog about you, share to friends, a.s.o.  - that could help, it would invrease your traffic, but to have a Like alone, doesn't help you rank better. Thats my opinion and think I am not alone, even Google told us something like that last days... May be popularity should play a role in some cases, but i really don't want to see popular sites, I like sites in SERPs answering my question in a brilliant way. SearchEngines couldn't see it in a really different way.

@2 sorry -I don't know a good companie for you

RangeMarketing is right, but there is an pretty easier way to, share the page @ gplus.
I realized that it sometimes is faster. But usually I fatch as google in both cases, like Range Marketing said.

Saw it - in english only. I think it would take a little while until we will see it in german... THX 4 the respond.

not really the right place, but has anyone an idea if and when Pigeon update is coming to europe?

I would prefer some more details- which keywords, why do you chose them, higher rankings means what? Two, Three or 20 Positions? How often is it searched and how much klicks do you have. Whats the Keyword trend?

Maybe the chosen Keyword is wrong, maybe the topic isn't as hot as last year, maybe its an ugly search snippet ...

It is pretty interesting how often the same question is asked. 
Its good to ask, better than just chose the easiest way - both are right - in that point the folder would be the right decision. Give Horvath a thumb up

SamuelScott is 100% right, I only wanted to add, that we should stop thinking about the anchor. It is allways manipulation in the room, when we think about anchor. Thats my opinion.

OK there is no general issue,just search for "visueller yoga guide" so i guess google is changing the title that it fits better, search for a term in the title and its the right one.

www.google.de/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=visueller yoga guide

^^ es gibt keinen generellen Fehler, vermutlich überschreibt Google den Title, dass es besser passt, suche einfach mal nach "visuellem Yoga guide"

interessant, warum lässt du eigentlich "category" - yoast kann das doch rausschmeissen. Wann hattest du den Titel geändert? BTW hast du 2 mal Yoga Übungen als Title, einmal als Produkt.Ich habe das Problem nicht, Wordpress und Yoast nutze ich auch. Vorsicht, wenn du sie rausnimmst, das /blog/ drin stehen bleibt und der Artikel nicht deine Produkte überschreibt. Ich forsche mal ein bisschen und melde mich.

thats interesting, why do you let the "category" in your urls when yoast can take them out? when did you changed your title tag? by the way, you hav got 2 times "Yoga Übungen" in your titles, one is a product. I never had that problem, and I use Wordpress and Yoast like you do. Be carefull if you want to take the category out, it could override youre product pages. I search a bit for the probebly reason and answer again.

Sorry MOZ I think we can understand each other better in german

I cant say any other thing than @evolvingSEO he is right, your content clearly looks like social media. 
There is an opportunity for image search of course, thatswhy you could name the puppy/dog you write about like I said above - but your traffic screams out social media

If you optimize for dog contest, just because it is searched a lot, you will frustrate any person wich want to participate on a dog contest (as long as you dont do dog contests).

The title should be pretty unique and is a huge ranking factor. It should fit to the content and (imo) to the h1 tag.

The content of the description isn't used for ranking, but makes the differnce between click or no click.
What I also saw: it is better to have no Meta Description (if the content is good enaugh) as often the same Description.
I saw many many pages ranking bad, wich fast get a bit better when I made the descriptions unique. So it may be a ranking faktor how unique the page is. Wich means everything - content, pics, titles, descriptions ... I am running a lot of tests wich take a look on that

I do exactly the same thing on one domain - I show the +1 for the Site on all pages in the footer (since one year) and the site has best rankings and organic traffic, no loss in that year, its getting better and better. So I guess, Google doesn't care