Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Yes, that definitely helps! And, I just checked back on the "tampa car accident lawyer" vs "tampa car accident attorney" question I asked you a few weeks ago. I posted on the original thread, but the local pack is now showing up for both terms.
Thanks again,
Ruben
it sounds like you're in the same boat I was 6 months ago, so I can tell you, you are already using the most important tool Moz has to offer: this q/a forum. Granted, you should definitely take advantage of the 101 videos and tutorials, but it's amazing the quality of info top level people in this industry will give you, just because you asked.
Good luck!
Ruben
Are your title tags in images? If so, it will report it as missing.
Hi Miriam,
Sorry I didn't get back sooner, I was out of the office. I'm attaching a screenshot of exactly what I saw on getlisted.org.
Thanks,
Ruben
[
](<a href= "G= Listing")" target="_blank">a> qKCKJNK.jpg
It's not a site. It's just a listing. I found it when I ran it through "getlisted.org" What branch of Google did you call?
Thanks,
Ruben
I just found a duplicate listing for our business. It's under a different name and address but the phone number is the same. The duplicate listing needs to be deleted, BUT, here's the problem: no one verified the listing (it was our old firm). And now, to delete it, we have to verify it first, but we don't have access to the building to get the letter. Also, we can't ask the current tenants to give us the letter, because it's another law firm and they just aren't going to help us out.
So, any ideas?
Ruben
It's a cool thought, and it very well be an improvement over today's situation. The major reservation that jumped out at me was that it would hurt fresh content. I'm guessing 100 was a number you just threw out there, but whatever the number, once a site hits that number of quality links, they wouldn't need to produce anything else. Well, at least in terms of link building, they wouldn't need to produce anything else.
Also, different size sites would need different numbers. For example, 100 really high quality DA of 90 and above links would take my site a long time to get, but, Moz, for example, probably already has that. If you decide to make the number really high, 10,000 high quality DA of 90 then it might take Moz awhile to get that, but since neither myself, nor any of my competitors will ever reach number, it's not much of a deterrent for us to get fivver, comment links.
Check this thread out for some help. http://moz.com/community/q/how-to-determine-which-pages-are-not-indexed
Best,
Ruben
Tom,
I'll look into rafflecopter, and you do make a good point. The active fans are more valuable. Ideally, I'd love to have a fair contest that included everybody, and fate just happened to pick one of the 25 to 30 people who interact with the page weekly. Perhaps, this could be an alternative.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Ruben
That's what I was thinking, but I thought there was a cap? You can get them all or at least, up to the 1200s (that's all we have)?
All I want are names. I don't want any hardcore data. The only reason I need it, is because we do "like" based give-a-ways from time-to-time. Although "life isn't fair," I prefer not to exclude people who liked us earlier, if I don't have to.
Has anyone found a work-around to export the entire list of people how have liked your page? I know this has been on-going problem for people, but I'm hoping someone here discovered a secret method they'd like to share...please.
Thanks,
Ruben
I'm dealing with some geographical keywords that may cause me problems. If I target a county and a city inside that county that share part of a name, will I be at risk for cannibalization? For example, if I want to target "Jasper County Adoption Attorneys" and "Jasper Park Adoption Attorneys," will I be at risk just based on cannibalization?
Thanks,
Ruben
I remember reading a post by either Rand or Dr. Peter (can't remember which) that said they did a poll of top SEO's and speed was around 10%. However, if I were you, I'd pay more attention to the points EGOL made.
Best,
Ruben
I ran your site through OSE, but that wasn't helpful. You actually have more linking domains, higher DA and higher PA. However - and I doubt this is the main reason, but it is a reason - why that pages outdoes yours is speed. I ran the two pages through pingdom, and his loaded in 1.42 seconds, whereas yours took 3.24 to load.
Good luck!
Ruben
Peter,
That's in analytics, right? Will it have all the data from the pro account sync with it or will it only have the historical rankings record from when we started using analytics?
Hey Paul,
I'm attaching a screenshot of the "Location of your sitemap file." I think these settings - which I didn't change - are correct. But, if I need to change something here, please let me know.
Thanks for help! I really have no idea what I did to cause this problem, but I guess, as long as it gets fixed, that's all that matters.
Best,
Ruben
Um, I want that very first report moz sends you when you first setup a campaign. It usually runs within 24 hours. Then, a week later you get your ongoing weekly report. I want that first one and I can't find it.
