Welcome to the Q&A Forum

In the example you've presented, I don't see a duplicate title tag. Product name A is different from product name B, which makes title page A different from title page B. If you want those titles to be even more unique, you could consider sometimes such as: Title page (A): Product name A | Unique Selling Point for product A with Good Keywords Title page (B): Product name B | Different Selling Point for Product B with Different Keywords

I would be worried that the js links are using linkjuice but not delivering it to the page, it may be evaperating As for link sculpting, linksculpting with no-follow is dead, but you shoudl be worried where your link jucie flows. using the flat linking structure as rank has bloged about is the best mathmaticly, but you need to also consider users.

Yes that sounds better to me. What do you use for the co logo - a tag with a bg image or just a straight image?

Google won't use the keyword anchor text in those links so much, but will follow them. They're also very user friendly, and are pretty much expected now a days.

Google really doesn't pay attention to footer links much anymore. Because of that exact reason: they know they're commonly used for spam and keyword stuffing. Write for humans; not for robots. Good luck!

I agree with not repeating company name, unless it's a different company than in the base url. Try only making those deep links if you absolutely have to! Good luck!

Home run! Thanks for that.

Good question. Am curious about this as well. If the site is translated to the specific geographic area, with the exact same content as the original site, will Google recognize that the content is in a different language and treat it as such?

Hi Ian, I see there are some 40 URLs with product in the URL from your site that are indexed in Google. Can you share with us how you were able to get those back in the index and any tips you may have learned from the experience? If you have a good writeup, do consider submitting to YOUmoz as well. Thanks!

Great questions.  I am sure many of us are watching how the Panda update is changing linking. Here is the answer everybody hates (including me at times)  I think the big change in 2011, and 2012 in SEO has to be in building better content on sites, and building better social signals to sites. And for most of us that's a real change in course. Adding calculators, tips, Forums, FAQ, and funny stuff along with Quality promotion for links. We still use Directories and Articles, but only when we we do it because it makes promotional sense, not just SEO.

This is certainyl the type of feedback I was after. Having revisited the homepage and landing pages it nwo seems obvious that the landing page doesn't give enough detail about the product. I've been toying with the idea of removing the video for a while, as I'm not sure (in it's current state) it adds much value. Do you have any examples of videos that you consider to be "dyanmic enough to whip out your credit card"? I will certainly test out some of the other elements you've pointed out.

If it's purely from a user point of view and you don't need Google to crawl the links I have two suggestions: 1 - Do it in JavaScript or some other language that Google can't click, then there is no way Google can see or use the links 2- Alternatively you could always just stick a no-follow on all the navigation links Not sure if either of the above help, kind of confused at your needs to be honest. If you truely build it in the best interest for the users, the number of links shouldnt be an issue. If it's all city links, why not try grouping them into the country, then into city. Craig