Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Same Question: I know Google has a Structured Data Testing Tool here: https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/u/0/ I don't think it works with Client-Side content, so just wondering if there is another way to test?

Thanks for your response, John. That's good to know. I wonder why Moz lists bit.ly as the domain with a DA of 97 when it's just a redirect from another site. Shouldn't it list the actual url? (BTW, in the case I'm referring to, the shortened link was actually an article from our competitor's own website, so definitely not a backlink.)

I'm having the same issue with https://www.nxt-chptr.com . I fixed a redirect issue, but then that hasn't helped. I have tested the Rogerbot through other tools and it said that it was "Allowed." So, not sure what the issue is. Should I just delete the campaign and start a new one?

In my experience it doesn't from an SEO perspective/DA perspective. The additional traffic will help in other ways! I hope that helps!

Yes - I would remove/no-index rather than redirect. The URL's don't have any equity so it's not worth redirecting them. Thanks!

Thanks a ton John!!! Merry Christmas and Happy New year in Advance.

Hey!  We were experiencing a slight bug but the engineers put through a fix so all your data should look accurate again.  if you have further issues, please shoot us an email to help@moz.com so we can help out! thanks

Thanks Sam, I will keep my fingers crossed Google like the new structure, but importantly it is going to be a better experience for the user.

This is just an exemple (not really one of my clients) but lets say there is this paragraph of this web page: https://smallbusinesstaxaccountants.ca/about-us "Small Business Tax Accountants (Canada) Inc. is quickly becoming an industry leader at accounting and bookkeeping for Canadian businesses by combining the latest templated documentation with highly qualified business professionals, in a truly unique formula!" and on each of my citation and directory's description i am building, I am using this text as a description: "Small Business Tax Accountants (Canada) Inc. is quickly becoming an industry leader at accounting and bookkeeping for Canadian businesses by combining the latest templated documentation with highly qualified business professionals, in a truly unique formula!"

Thank you for your answer. Indeed all href lang settings are correct allready.

Well, you can't 100% rely on third-party tools anyways they might miss it sometimes especially Moz, they are still rookie in this. The other day, I got an email from Moz saying that we couldn't crawl one of your site "Warning" Red alert etc, Robots.txt isn't there. I doubled check it manually everything was smooth and then I made Moz re-crawl the site to check if everything is okay so yes it was. Moz needs to work hard to improve their tool and it's function it doesn't give you the proff look and feel.

Thats great thanks Tim !

Canonical tags are used to let Google know which version of two identical/very similar pages to index. Even if you don't think you have duplicate pages, sometimes you may have duplicates because of parameters or letter case. They are also helpful if someone scrapes your content and brings the canonical along with it—Google will know where the original is. So it's good to do this, but just having canonicals on a page will not improve ranking by themselves.

Thanks for providing your opinion. Much appreciated.