Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Not sure about the & (That doesn't mean it's not true) however if you are interested in search operators have a look here on Moz : http://moz.com/blog/25-killer-combos-for-googles-site-operator If you want to know how many pages are indexed by Google then use the WMT here http://www.google.com/webmasters/

Thanks for your help guys - and also reassuring to confirm my initial recommendations were correct.

Dave Naylor is a well respected SEO practitioner in the UK... https://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/ Contact them and ask for a quote....they're a solid performer, eh!

I second the use of Yoast's WordPress SEO plugin.  For google specifically, you can specify which version (www or non-www) you want to use in Webmaster tools.

Have you tried this tool? http://www.feedthebot.com/tools/richsnippets/breadcrumb/ It should be noted that just because you mark something up on the page doesn't mean Google will always use the markup in the SERPs. Here is an example SERP on which this page from Overstock.com has a breadcrumb.

Terapeak is still my choice, I've tried trendsamazon early january this year, it was good, but Im not so sure how it has improved over the months.

Hi theponyclub This was reviewed at one point last year and a response from our product team can be found here. https://seomoz.zendesk.com/entries/463828-webtrends-omniture-and-coremetrics-integrations?page=1#post_20881502 We haven't seen a lot of requests to integrate other tools but you could help start up a new discussion for our product team to review. What you would lose from Google Analytics will be organic visits for the site and social and landing pages data.

Hi Ed, Thanks for letting us know about this issue. My initial impression of the situation is that this would be an excellent question to email to help@moz.com, because we can easily pass it off to our engineers if it looks like a bug and if the answer is specific to your account there are no privacy concerns. Hopefully this helps and if you have any other questions or concerns please feel free to ask. Have a wonderful day and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Actually, screamingfrog should take care of it for you via the custom spider configuration.  If you select "custom" under the "configuration" tab, you can drop in the html for the links you are looking for and it will give you a report with what pages it finds that code on. For example, have screammingfrog search for the following snippet of code and it would find nofollow links pointing at mysite.com: rel="nofollow" href="http://mysite.com

Could be coincidence, sometimes they index XML sitemaps.

Thank you MoosaHemani for your quick answer, that is a relief. I think I will ask the client to delete all errors again and have them check when Google processed the latest sitemap, just in case.

No. We're actually not launching this initiative for SEO purposes. We just want to create value for our users and having their own stand-alone website is valuable to them. I just want to make sure we're structured properly from an SEO point of view so that we don't compromise the SEO of our marketplace, or their stand-alone site. Also, each site has unique content, but it is identical data to their marketplace store. So, every seller has a marketplace store (with items, a profile etc) AND a stand-alone website (with the same items, same profile etc, just designed differently and accessible via a sub-domain). Hope that makes sense.

Are you asking rather than having two site brandA.com & brandB.com is there a way to create brand.com and on that site display the content relevant to the visitors location? If not then I agree with EGOL

Hi Rox, Good for you for going straight to Google with this. That was just what I was going to suggest after reading your initial post but before I saw your follow-up. And thanks for generously share what you've learned. This may be of future help to other community members:)

Telling someone there's no such thing as a duplicate content penalty is misleading. While it may not officially be called a "duplicate content penalty," you can get penalized for duplicate content, and not protecting yourself from it opens you up. So when someone suggests to clean up duplicate content, it's bad form to butt in and imply that there's no need, since no such penalty exists. That's all I was trying to say. Won't spam this thread anymore discussing it.

Hi, No no crawl errors with webmaster tools just in the Moz, I guess that a good thing?

Sounds interesting, I would be interested in hearing other people's points of view, as far as I'm aware it wouldn't have a negative impact on SEO and I can't work out why it would. Do you have an example of the page you are hosting the infographic on ?