Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Agree with Erwan, sounds like you are getting personalized results rather than actual. Use SEMRush and Google Webmaster tools to find keywords you are ranking for (including ones you didn't know you were ranking for) Add any new keywords you are ranking for into SEOMoz to track

Hi David, thanks for your help, but unfortunately I can't influence this setup with a separate domain. So I will put my feature request. Thank you Holger

One of the best features about SEOMOZ PRO, in my opinion. Other tools i have used either don't do that or make it difficult to find.

Only until 200 MozPoints, then he takes away the nofollow from one of the links in your profile.

Thanks for the clarity. Will approach accordingly.

Hi Jim! Thanks for the question.  One thing we should clarify before we move forward is that the Pro app doesn't actually report on duplicate URLs, but we do report when we find duplicate title tags or content. Duplicate titles just refer to when we find the same title tag on more than one page. In one example from your diagnostics, we're reporting the title tag 'Truthbook Religious News' is being used in multiple pages (http://screencast.com/t/GYCKNfAoj). Duplicate content is content we see on the source code of your pages that is identical or nearly identical and would cause the pages to compete against each other for rankings.  To fix either of these you have a several options: Set up a 301 redirect to have the pages you would consider duplicate redirect to the main page. - Change the content/title tags enough that they won't be considered duplicates Canonicalize the content you would consider duplicates. Most developers will go for the latter two options so that the pages will still be reachable by visitors. You can find out more about how to implement these in our Help Hub. To answer your other questions: 1 - At the time of the crawl, we were able to get to sub domain pages from other pages on your site.  The sub domains were also resolving separately, but they seem to be redirecting to your root domain now, so your next crawl should reflect this. 2 - Running a curl for the print versions of your pages, I see "no follow" tags related to Wikipedia links embedded (http://screencast.com/t/reYjeLLPvWG3) in the doc, but I'm not finding any "no index tags" (http://screencast.com/t/DsXMZInngSzH).  This would be why you're seeing us crawling those pages. 3 - As I mentioned above, our crawler looks for similarities in the source code of pages when reporting on duplicate content.  Since no one knows exactly how similar content would need to be for the search engines to consider it a duplicate, we err on the side of caution and recommended best practices when reporting them. Using one of the methods mentioned above and detailed in our Help Hub should resolve this for you Let me know if you have any other questions! Best, Sam Moz Helpster

Hello IMM, When you are doing redirection of URL A to URL B so canonical tag is not very useful. Canonical tag we used so many duplicate pages is created dynamically & you can't all pages to redirect onto one main page. You know that which page should be redirected then no use of canonical tag of URL A on URL B. Just put URL B in canonical tag for MAIN PAGE.

Hey Bond, Thanks for writing in with a great question. Both the campaign data and the data in OSE are pulled from the same Mozscape index, but OSE defaults to page metrics, so you will want to make sure that you are comparing domain metrics to domain metrics between the campaign and OSE. When I checked the domain metrics between your campaign and OSE, the data did match up correctly. I may be able to explain the comparison better through screenshots, but I wasn't sure if you wanted to share your campaign information publicly. The only thing I am seeing that doesn't show data correctly is actually the second competitor in your campaign because it is set up as ww.competitor2.co.uk, rather than www.competitor2.co.uk, which skews the subdomain metrics in the campaign link analysis. If you update the subdomain in your campaign settings, you should start getting better data for that competitor in the rankings and link analysis. If you would like me to send you the screenshots to explain how the campaign compares to OSE privately, please let me know and I will email that to you right away. I hope this helps! Chiaryn

Hey Mike It's not so much a case of the titles not 'being indexed' or read but more to do with how they display in the search engine result pages (SERPs). If your page is long, then the title is going to be cut off. Also, the general goal is to have your keywords at the beginning of the title to get the most bang for your buck. Specifics depend on the site but it is nice to have the page title like the title of a book and consider your site as the author. Have it short, punchy but descriptive and also state the author so: Small Business SEO Packages | BowlerHat.co.uk is better than Do better in the search engines with small business SEO packag.. Your title has one job to do: describe the page in a way that search engines and users can understand. So, if the description of the page is done by Yahoo in a sub optimal way then yeah, it will hurt your ranking and it will negatively affect the amount of people that click on the link when it is displayed. Lose - Lose | YourSite.co.uk Hope that helps! Marcus

Thanks Guys

Have you tried OSE to find links pointing to the new URL and the old one?

Hello Brandon! Thanks for the heads up. I have seen this happen a few times in the past when the account was temporarily suspended because of payment method changes. Our engineers can likely update this for you in the back end. The best step would be to create a ticket with our help team by emailing this issue to help@seomoz.org. Ask for Abe in the subject line and include the login email and campaign name in the content window. I'll have them take a look at this as soon as possible

Any chance you all are close to having Google Plus in the social Monitoring of the SEOmoz Tools? It's more than important at this time.

Hello, Does anyone have any idea why these links show as followable when they were nofollowed 6 weeks ago? Any answer would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Steve

Thank you.

Hello Brian, In the current SEOmoz web app, this functionality is not yet available. We are hoping to incorporate local results in the near future. We have had several feature requests for this data so I know that this request is near the top of the list.

Thanks for the update - I just went and noticed that your Moz profile is back here as well. Amazingly, it definitely seems like they are giving their own page more weight despite the other being obviously older.  Copies are copies - and they don't want it. Good to know! (Glad it worked!)

Hi Richard! Thank you for your feedback! This seems like a very useful feature. I would suggest that you resubmit it via our feature request forum. Our product team reviews feature requests on a regular basis, so hopefully they'll be able to add this to the queue for future release. Let me know if you have any other questions! Best, Sam Weber Moz Helpster

Hello Chiaryn, I have just checked again and the nofollow links still show up as followed in site explorer.  Could you have a look at why this is happening please? Kind regards Steve Brumpton

I would do pretty much what you're doing I would also check and see who's paying money to advertise clickbank products via PPC You can use tools like keywordspy for this