Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I track seperately 3 sites:

http://mysite.com.br
http://en.mysite.com.br
http://es.mysite.com.br

I want to avoid that issues from a subdomain like "**es.**mysite.com.br" appear in the crawl reports for http://mysite.com.br

How can I achieve this. Please see the screenshot of my settings for mysite.com.br

• by the way all options are greyed... means if I need to change I must skip all my gathered data a setup a new campaign?

Thanks

campaign-settings.png

Hi Kevin,

I think this sounds like a good idea and you should present these items in a special category exactly promoting it with "we go hunting for it for you and find it ... if not fount here...". I think many people are looking for rare replacement parts and even could contribute finding one if someone is looking for it. This will be good for the User Experience and engage users to have a look more often on the page.

May be post a link of your site what it looks like right now and people may even suggest here how to include these specialities ... so you can test the UX right here

O.K. finally I can answer this question myself:

I installed lately a True Type Font: ufonts.com_helvetica_neue_ultralight.ttf
which affected many browser fonts that I hardly could not use moz anymore. So problem is solved.

Never install the font mentioned above !

Dear community,

checking Google Analytics Behavior Section:
Landing Pages: it shows for the index page a Bounce Rate of 46,77% Checking the Behavior Flow it shows 46.7% as Through traffic going to other pages.... and 53.3% as Drop-offs. Whats wrong here as this seems flipped, isn't it?

Please see attached screenshot.
original resolution: http://inlinear.com/download/moz/bounce-rate-landing-page-and-behavior-flow.jpg

bounce-rate-landing-page-and-behavior-flow.jpg

Hi,

thank you, I wrote the problem is on all browsers similar. I attached another screenshot showing Chrome, Safari, FF and IE. And not all Webfonts are problematic as the type "Moz Q&A Forum" is well..

screenshot-problem-webfonts2.png

Actually I have problems with the rendering of webfonts on all browsers. As moz uses 100% Webfonts I hardly can read text.

Anybody had this problem before?

please help!

THX

attached a screen to see what it looks like...

screenshot-problem-webfonts.png

Hi Christiy,

I realized that I have actually a problem with webfonts on my computer in general. I make no idea what could have caused this.... so the moz site look great.

Maybe anybody knows what could be wrong... I'm using windows7 and on all browsers Webfonts look terrible.

I attached a screenshot....

Thanks for any help : )

screenshot-problem-webfonts.png

Seems moz is testing webfonts? On Chrome its hard to read not to say horrible. On FF its a little better.Or is this just on my computer?

The Pages I get alerts from  have been indexed months ago. But the question remains, what exactly makes google find the link on pages "several times":which have already been indexed, and never changed since the first alert?

Hi Martin,

exactly thats the point! Because I get alerts although nothing gets published or updated on these pages.

May be the pages which contain my banner and link with my domain name get new links? And when there appears a new link pointing on this page ... google detects this page again as a new "publication" and sends an alert?

I think you can test this issue best with a "Text-Only-Browser" to see how search engines see your page.

Here are some links:
If your page is already indexed with Google, put in the following URL:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_example.com_
Google will show in the grey cache-info box a link "text-only-version"

The Safari-Browser shows a "reader Icon" if there is a lot of text on a page...
Or you may check this link for more Text-Browsers: http://www.internetmarketingninjas.com/blog/seo-tools/5-text-only-browsers/

Hope this helps!

Hi Thomas,

301 Redirects Do Not Pass Full PageRank & Link Value. Thats what I know. Also http://seomoz.org/ was redirected to http://moz.com and just has a PR of 2.

Please see this Interview with Matt Cutts about this question: http://www.seroundtable.com/archives/021832.html Also see this Matt Cutts Video from february this year: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Filv4pP-1nw&feature=player_embedded#at=21

hope this helps,
best regards,
Holger

Checking Keyword-density is just to primitive... what is your recommendation for the subject WDFPIDF?
The SEO-Tool onpage.org (german) offers an interesting tool to analyse your text. But there are differences between languages and factors like proximities, synonyms etc. What are your experiences?

• tools?
• does mOz develop a tool for this? This would be a nice Feature for the On-Page Grader!

best regards,
Holger

I take it from a practical point of view: If in doubt, leave it out : ), I took the www. away from all of my sites because it seems a relict from the beginning of the WWW and just makes the domain unnecessarily longer (alos when advertising it) So do not encounter any Problem with it. Sure, people can access my site via www. but will be redirected to the non-WWW address.

But I am curious if this can have any disadvantage, as well. Here is may be a helpful link: http://no-www.org/

best regards,
Holger

Hi Martin,

exactly thats the point! Because I get alerts although nothing gets published or updated on these pages.

May be the pages which contain my banner and link with my domain name get new links? And when there appears a new link pointing on this page ... google detects this page again as a new "publication" and sends an alert?

Hi Tyler,

yes I ended up with the simple checking of the "noindex,follow" option for Tag within the YOAST Plugin (Taxonomies-Tab).

Now all the duplicate Content Issues are gone... so why is this option not set per default? hmmm

Thanks
Holger