Welcome to the Q&A Forum

This looks to be an IP problem obviously. But this could also be a faulty configuration in your DNS settings. I believe there is an setting for DNS managers where you set the name of the MAIL IP or URL.

I suggest contacting the host about the DNS settings or if you're using a type of DNS manager. I've seen this in CloudFlare where you have to set your configurations correctly prior to sending emails.

Google: "back to school supplies haul"

I thought this was really epic and first time I've ever seen such a results page. No ads, no text results.

Anyone else seen this?

-First post on new Moz design.

You can noindex them but in my opinion and experience small things like that are not worth the trouble. I suggest moving on and working on something that is more impactful to the site. Messing around with something that has little consequence is not worth it...especially if you might ruin something if you don't know what you are doing.

You can use the canonical tag if you are having too many duplicate URLs.

As for the crawl, you shouldn't look at it as if you don't do this or that, your site will not be ranking well. These things do happen and every site will have issues like that. No one has a perfect 5k page site without some sort of error. The crawl is giving you suggestions and you should choose which ones are more detriment to your rankings.

Smaller errors and things like duplicate pages are normal within a website, and the bottom line is sometimes you have no choice as it might mess with your site's usability.

That Wikipedia page Muslim_Academy needs links from other Wikipedia articles and vice versa. That is a simple explanation to how to get those notifications removed.

You need some sort of navigation, and if you already have a top nav and the left bar is repetitive and doesn't have any real good use other than SEO...I'd say remove it.

If anything too many on-page links is not a good thing.

The secret is that the number is irrelevant. Sure it might be a measuring stick but it is one of the last thing you need to worry about.

The only people really worried about PR is people trying to sell links or sell a site. Other than those reasons PR doesn't do anything for a site's performance.

Lets say your PR is showing 0 right now, and next update you will be PR 3. You will already be performing as a PR 3 even if your toolbar doesn't say so.

Redirect if you plan on changing URLs. One thing you have to make sure is having all URLs in an excel sheet and create redirects for each one that is changed.

You'd also have to make sure to import all your descriptions and title tags etc etc.

Those are some of the main hurdles in SEO and changing carts or CMS.

No links to other Wikipedia articles mean you have to linked certain text on that URL to other Wikipedia pages.

Like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Academy has anchor text to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim

Orphan means vice versa, where let's say

FOR EXAMPLE:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Academy

Points to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim

First off, I would think to myself what is the reason we are linking them all to.
If the reason is good enough to cross link the sites together, I'd nofollow them.

Sitewide links have been proven to be a bad option and if it is a must, I'd nofollow them.

I think you mean 301 redirects. The best way to not lose any rankings at all is making sure each URL has a 301 redirect to the new URL. Otherwise, all your links will just return an error.

Usually this is the best way to ensure link juice is being passed to your new URLs. It is tedious but needs to be done.

The site itself has valuable and authentic content EXCEPT product pages.

I've got in touch with the spam team at Google and there was no spam action taken on the site. However, I still feel the product pages are doing poorly since I Google the exact text in the product description without "" would not provide that product page...instead links to a article directory (spun content).

Claudio,

To get a definite answer to your question, simply go to Google Webmaster Tools and send a reconsideration request.

They will notify you if you are still penalized or there was no action taken on your account.

So I'm working on a site right now that has been plagued with spun/rewritten content..we are talking in the thousands.

Now would it be a smarter idea to just remove all the content or leave the content?

This is an ecommerce site and I'm tasking a few people to rewrite fresh authentic content. So all of the spun/thin content will be removed eventually.

The main question is to just delete it all right now or just replace as we go.

I'd like to know what you guys think.

I agree with Mike. Letting a customer know you are choosing their review to be posted on your site generally gives a good sentiment to the customer.

You benefit in both ways, creating a good relationship with your customer(more WOM referrals) and giving your site a legitimate review.

It can happen by accident. If it was posted and not pending I would ask SEOmoz to review it.

You can contact them by going to this page:

http://www.seomoz.org/help

And click "Contact our help team"

Re-writing everything would be ideal but it might be costly if you really have a lot of content.

You will have to weigh out the pros and cons.

Thanks Andy.

I was more curious in regards to the <a></a>tag.

You should always want to get any advantage on SEO. So I'd suggest changing up the content just a bit unless you don't have the manpower to do all of them.

Negative would being flagged as spam for duplicate content, however is sometimes rare for shorter descriptions.

Larger bulks of content could be more likely to be flagged, so I'd keep that in mind.

From my knowledge only way an HTML link is nofollow is using rel="nofollow".

I was wondering if you have a link , is there anything you can put OTHER than rel="nofollow" within the <a></a>tags that make a link nofollow?