Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I've had experiences with Wufoo(owned by SurveyMonkey) and they are pretty good at doing forms and can do a variety of things like accepting payments.

But it seems you just want an automated contact form, which majority of times are sent from your very own server. Have you ever considered changing your IP address, so that your emails are not being marked as spam? If you're on a shared IP, that could be the reason why your email submissions are being marked as spam.

Another option would be to alter your email settings where the contact form has a static title, that you can always make sure it is not marked as spam.

I always look at the algorithm updates first and then look at the site structure. Assuming that your graph is a filter of all organic visits, that looks like you got hit by an algorithm update or something changed on your site you were not aware of.

Thats the case for most graphs that look like that. I mean...what else could it be.

Your canonicals are good. You should not worry about that URL and those duplicate pages in specific.

For clarification: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2013/04/5-common-mistakes-with-relcanonical.html

Also you can try to search the caonicalized URL and see if its indexed, in this case it is not.'

For example search:http://www.plasticplace.com/business/trash-bags-for-rollaway-cans?gallon_capacity=368

And your original URL will apepar in SERPs.

If you have duplicate content, the best practices are typically 301 redirects or canonicals. This would really depend what type of pages they are, whether they are campaigns, parameters, pagination(could use prev/next).

If you have an example we should be able to tell what you should do for that example.

I'm not 100% but perhaps Moz doesn't crawl duplicate pages and their code. It could be more about title tags, meta data etc.

As long as your canonical tags are in place and pointing to the original source, you should be fine.

Assuming that you are saying you have both of these as a subdomain for MOZ you would need to change your account settings to root domain.

And if you need this for Google, you can simply link to it or fetch as Googlebot in webmaster tools.

301 redirects usually would suffice. Also I know Bing WMT has moving site function, which can help as well. And for Google WMT, I think you can make the same changes as well in there.

I guess they don't show the post that it was clicked from, or it was clicked from the news feed section.

What are the page metrics? Bounce rate, exit, visit duration etc. If you are not actively promoting on Facebook and or active users/readers mentioning your brand, it would be extremely odd that you would get that much from Facebook.

It could be purchased traffic, have you hired someone to do this for you? I know there are ways to spoof traffic to look like its coming from a source.

301 Redirects will pass almost all of the authority. I suggest as the other commenter stated to use a static URL.

Should be immediate on your site.

Moz crawler would take a few crawls probably. Googlebot you can fetch as Google from Webmaster Tools to make sure they crawl it right away.

If you just make the changes and nothing else, you will just be waiting on Google to update it. I'd suggest fetching as Google via WMT and submited all URLs(theres an option there) when fetching.

There is a difference between referral source and referral path. I think the bigger question is what the referral path is. You should be able to view where the hit is coming from Facebook.

And as Alberto stated, it could be a rewrite, which is how Analytics classifies a URL path.

Here are some general things you can do to get rid of duplicate content. Albeit it is slightly more complicated in implementation and when to use them.

rel=canonicals - similar content pages
rel=prev, rel=next - pagination
noindex - pages that are irrelevant or useless. empty pages that are very similar could be a time to use this. or pages that you do not want or believe can be an asset from a user. like shopping cart.
301 redirect - to pages that are pretty much the same

There are many ways to approach duplicate content and depending on your site it will vary. Whether it is a straight forward issue like tags and categories, or if its slightly more complicated in unique parameters that filters a category in a faceted concept.

From your post it seems you have an issue with tags and normally I'd say to noindex tags or canonical them to the proper category. From what I remember /tags/ being indexed is not a good practice.

At times it could be best to just keep dates out of the URL but that is little signal to Google. You can always use structured data to signal to Google the page is new or updated.

Another thing you could do is do a 301 redirect from the old page to the new page, thus pushing all the link juice to the new URL.

Thanks for the additional content. I'm working on a study to give a very solid strong case for improving structured data on one of our sites. With semantic search being more prominent than ever, I think its extremely important for every site to have mark up whether or Google chooses to show this.

Social media functions and other future applications could very well use this data to classify content of a page(see ogp.me). Perhaps even bucketing links via structured data and using it to gauge relativity of linking pages etc.

Not sure if you are using the correct tool, it seems you are in AdWords.

Use this:https://adwords.google.com/ko/KeywordPlanner/Home

I see 201,000 for "anderson cooper".

I'm looking to do some study in impact across the board on structured data and would like to know if anyone has any good studies on CTR, possibly rankings and overall performance.

Any awesome links would be helpful

I agree. .com will always be king and I don't see any overtaking it. I personally think TLD have a very small factor in rankings between one TLD or another.

Yes, there is a possibility. If there are links the disconnecting branch, it can impact the juice flow throughout your site. And 301 redirecting to another site will point all the juice over there as well.

Depending on the amount of links and internal linking structure of your site, it can possibly hurt your overall rankings but it depends(as always).

If they must, I suggest linking back to the original company's site just to be sure they are still connected in a way.

Use this FAQ for troubleshooting. I remember a Moz employee posted this: http://moz.com/community/q/trending-bugs-in-moz-analytics

You are referring to PMD(partial) and EMD(exact). They are still ranking factors in these and although Google is not punishing these domains they are devaluing the ranking factor to these type of domains.

This is not necessarily going against PMD & EMD, its just means there are many other factors that come into play before PMD & EMD.

One thing you can refer to is: http://mozcast.com/metrics

There will be a chart for EMD and PMD to show you the change in rankings of EMD and PMDs.