Welcome to the Q&A Forum

If you have canonical tags on these pages, don't worry about it. But you might want minimize these pages and/ or redirect them to a primary. The dynamic url "?" may also be making it hard for seomoz to see the canonical tag. I would ask seomoz here: http://www.seomoz.org/about/contact

Also SEOmoz checks all pages, whether they are cached by google or not.

If you're worried, switch it to a local registrar. It won't take too long to propagate. I would go for it, if it's not a high trafficed site.

A 50% click through rate is really high. Then a good conversion rate is 2%. So then you're dealing with 2-3 purchases. All that sounds reasonable. Bounce is just people that leave immediately, you're exit rate should also be considered.

Thanks @wissam. Which GWT should I use. GWT Designer?

http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/overview.html

That sounds great! How do I see if its giving a 200.

What would I do in GWT

How can I fetch as googlebot in labs?

Damn you got me on all three

Great I'm glad I assist. If this helped answer your question, please mark it.

Thanks!

So I need to get this page cached: http://www.flowerpetal.com/index.jsp?info=13

It's been 4-5 months since uploaded. Now it's linked to from the homepage of a PR5 site. I've tweeted that link 10 times, facebooked, stumbled, linked to it from other articles and still nothing. And I submitted the url to google twice.

Any thoughts?

Thanks

Tyler

OSE is really just a way to see what links OSE thinks are imporant (that are link to you). This is kind of a report. The real work is going out and getting links. OSE will not give you links, but report to you which one's you have. I really love SEObook toolbar for firefox. This shows me the links to a page and the TLD (entire domain) from OSE and also yahoo. Yahoo is also an excellent (if not better) resource for seeing all the links that are going to your site. Best ways to build links:
Guest blog posts, partnerships, produce content that people link to, articles distribution and press releases.

Hello,

Below is what I use. You need to have the modrewrite enabled if you are going to disallow index.php and even then it's still very risky. This may be part of the issue. Robots.txt is so important, but you need to know what you are doing. Especially when disallowing as much as that UK site is.

Tyler

User-agent: *

Disallow: /*?

Disallow: /*.js$

Disallow: /*.css$

Disallow: /checkout/

Disallow: /catalogsearch/

Disallow: /review/

Disallow: /app/

Disallow: /downloader/

Disallow: /images/

Disallow: /js/

Disallow: /lib/

Disallow: /media/

Disallow: /*.php$

Disallow: /pkginfo/

Disallow: /report/

Disallow: /skin/

Disallow: /var/

Disallow: /customer/

Disallow: /enable-cookies/

Sitemap: http://domain.com/sitemap.xml

Hello,

If you get bad websites as affiliates through share a sale can that hurt your seo?

Thanks

Tyler

I'm happy to report that I just learned about citations. To get local listings I like: http://getlisted.org/

This clearly answers your question: http://www.webpronews.com/how-to-set-up-a-redirect-on-iis-nonwww-domain-name-to-www-domain-name-2005-09

If it's what wordpress says and is like having your own wordpress.com then there should be no issue.It sounds like the sites would all be subdomains of your network wordpress install.

But at the same time, I would say that if you are worried about seo and ranking I would do a separate install. And would eve go as far as to give them all their own dedicated IP.

God almighty, please stop with the customer in mind.

Yes its good for the customer and if I rank for these keywords I will get more traffic.

I thought about disallowing these pages, but they are good keywords that will get me traffic.

Code for multiple sitemaps:

<[sitemapindex](http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemapIndex_sitemapindex) xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
   <[sitemap](http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemapIndex_sitemap)>
      <[loc](http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemapIndex_loc)>http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml.gz
      <[lastmod](http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemapIndex_lastmod)>2004-10-01T18:23:17+00:00

   <[sitemap](http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemapIndex_sitemap)>
      <[loc](http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemapIndex_loc)>http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml.gz
      <[lastmod](http://sitemaps.org/protocol.php#sitemapIndex_lastmod)>2005-01-01

You can have one sitemap that shows all pages or you can have one sitemap index file that points to multiple sitemaps.

If you submit a sitemap index file to google then it will show that you have several sitemaps. I would do this for your regular site and your blog. But it doesn't really matter. The goal is to get your pages seen.

This is a great resource: http://sitemaps.org

BTW the stylesheet is not allow this sitemap to be seen in firefox: http://www.rmtracking.com/sitemap.xml

Also this company says it cuts out the middle man and saves merchants money: http://www.litle.com/

Merchant account is just the bank. I would do something like wells fargo.

Gateway would be authorize.net.

This is also a bad url format: http://www.energyacuity.com/Newsletter/Report.aspx?id=f974a1bf8f4b490a918c58c59750aa49&cid=ade05d15b4334aa9a6aa8974f6058e7f

They are dynamic and I have had a bunch of caching issues with this kind of url: http://www.seomoz.org/q/never-crawled

Although google says that dynamic urls are okay: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls-the-best-practice-for-seo-is-still-clear

There's still huge issues with them.