This post last year gives a good answer throughout.  In summary yes it does but the edge gets taken off the link 'power', just as a 301 doesn't pass 100%

http://moz.com/community/q/noindex-follow-is-a-waste-of-link-juice

I wouldn't say that the question is answered as such, more an issue identified.  For me it looks like having a directory of URLs having a canonical set to another directory of duplicate URLs messes things up for Google.

I get virtually no visibly indexed single URLs out of around 500 URLs, the directory site: search returns the URLs.  Some URLs were cached in the last day or 2, and plenty throw a 404 Google page when checking for a cached version. Seems flaky all round.

The canonical issue is identified.  This is more of a "i've never seen that" day.  Yes the directory Site: search returns all the URLs, but do a site: search for individual URLs and 95% are not showing as indexed.

yes, a sample page is cached.  It was cached today, however that URL using site: is not indexed. This URL was not showing as indexed yesterday either!

We are working on a site that has a whole section that is not indexed (well a few pages are).  There is also a problem where there are 2 directories that are the same content and it is the incorrect directory with the indexed URLs.

The problem is if I do a search in Google to find a URL - typically location + term then I get the URL (from the wrong directory) up there in the top 5.  However, do a site: for that URL and it is not indexed!  What could be going on here?

There is nothing in robots or the source, and GWT fetch works fine.

"When you hit 10/10, dump the old domain."

10/10 QS - that's ambitious!

You can't have more than one domain used per ad-group.  This would only be advisable to have in a new separate campaign within the account.  But if I understand you right then you are competing for the same keywords so both campaigns go in the bid auction and can push up your CPC.

Sorry for the delay.  I got sidetracked on another project and this client decided they would leave .js as is for the time being so I have not really tested. Initially I couldn't get the Chrome ext to do what I wanted and need to look at Firefox.

Another good tool is Fiddler for sniffing all header responses.

I'd still look at the link profile as well.  Penguin 3.0 is still rolling out http://searchengineland.com/google-penguin-3-0-rollout-still-ongoing-209886\.  Look into the profiles/content of the linking domains to rule you out being collateral damage as well.

I don't get it.  The code is only

<iframe src="http://www.linkedin.com/pub/profile-name/xx/xxx/xxx" width="1" height="1">.</iframe>

thanks.  I'll give it a try and let you know.

Any idea why someone would put a sitewide non-clickable one pixel wide link within an iframe in the footer to a linkedin profile?  It has thrown me.

thanks, that's quite handy but not what I need in this case.  This tool seems to switch off .js for the whole page.  I'm looking for something where I can cherry pick the .js on the page I want to block, or ideally move.

Is there a tool, or Chrome extension I can use to load a page, identify the .js on the page, 'uncheck' selected .js and load the page again to check loading correctly?  Even better to be able to defer/move to the end of the file to test.

I agree with Shakur and reusing goals can become messy.  If you do have the need for multiple goals I would also look at creating one or more new profiles in Analytics.  I'm working on a large site that now has 4 profiles, each with goals that make sense within that given profile.  For example, we have a profile name based around chat with a group of chat events and goals within.

This is not implemented.  You have both www and non www URLs along with /index.php for the homepage.  This needs to be implemented in your htaccess file with something like (ensure you backup existing file):

Redirect non-www urls to www

RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.4cabling.com.au
RewriteRule (.*) http://www.4cabling.com.au/$1 [R=301,L]

Remove index from URL

RewriteRule ^(.*)index.(htm|html|php)$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]

Your page load is woeful and you need to address - https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?url=http%3A%2F%2F4cabling.com.au%2F&tab=desktop

Also, you have not got canonical tags set up for each page which I would recommend

If it is the case that no URL for .us should exist (there are not new URLs) then you can remove pretty swiftly in Webmaster Tools >> Google Index >> Remove URLs >> select the root URL and select to remove all directories that come from it.

What is the URL?

ah, yes.  I seem to have walked into the middle of a shortener row which made things unclear

So to your original question.  I guess the answer is 'possibly' yes, if the link induced guys to click on the listing it might give it weight.

I'd look at your link profile.  You have a strong connection to weddings which is not your niche, along with suspect directory listings.