Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
You have to keep working at adding valuable content, and providing a great user experience.
At the same time you should never be satisfied with your backlink profile. Keep working on building them - but stick to high quality, relevant, and non-spammy links.
They are hard to get, but worth the time.
I would redirect all variations to www.abc.com as well as REL=Canonical back to www.abc.com. This should solve you issues.
It is because the MOZ crawl didn't pick up that pinterest page.
One thing I would recommend - on http://www.chicfamilytravels.com/: Your link to "follow me on Pinterest" which goes to http://www.pinterest.com/ChicFamily+/ is a dead link. Update it to the correct link http://www.pinterest.com/ChicFamily/
Hope that helps.
I agree with Jesse - this would cause major red flags to go up at google.
My pleasure! 
Exactly - as Keri explained, they try to crawl the most valuable links.
By linking to the correct pinterest page, you will signal to MOZ (and google) that your Pinterest profile is worth crawling/indexing, and it will gain more page authority as well.
Agree with Keri.
I don't think there is a "tool" for what you are looking for. Every site will have different conversion rates for the same keywords, based on relevance, reviews, authority, etc.
BUT
You can start to develop a good idea of keyword/conversion rates for your site over time.
You need to start thinking about the searcher's intent for a query as well. If someone searches for "Rayban Sunglasses" What % of them are ready to buy? What % of them want information on Rayban Sunglasses, such as prices, reviews, styles, etc.
I would imagine a keyword like "Rayban Wayfarers" will have a higher conversion rate than "Rayban Sunglasses."
Further, I would imagine "ray ban wayfarer 2140" would have a higher conversion rate than "rayban wayfarers"
From my experience, the longer tail, lower volume keywords usually have a higher conversion rate than the high traffic generic keywords (although when you are ranking for the generic terms you may turn out more conversions than the long tail, just due to the volume)
Hope that helps
I agree with Ron. I would not trade links with any random site, especially not one with SEO in the URL.
Why don't you cancel your brand new account, and upgrade you old account - and create the campaigns in the old account.
I would focus on the Page Title, and Duplicate Content stuff first.
The description tag won't hurt or help your ranking, it will just have an effect on your CTR.
Once you go through the Title & Content, start remedying the # of links.
Hope that helps.
I have been using Hostmonster for my websites for years now and I haven't experienced any problems that would cause me to switch. Hostmonster also makes it easier to host several domains at the same time.
Hope this helped!
Look in OSE: Showing only _rel=nofollow _links from external pages to pages on this root domain:
It shows only 17 no-follow external links to pages on your site.
I would take it down immediately.
This is so obviously like a paid link under "site partners."
The debate between UX and SEO has always been a pressing concern within the internet marketing community. While years ago these two factors were considered separate, as time passes the industry has realized that these two are not independent from one another but should work together.
That being said, I am always an advocate of launching a website as soon as it is ready. Of course this is only the case if all of the duplicate content, low-quality links and SEO black hat strategies have been removed. If any of these factors are present it can have a negative impact on site performance and where possible should be removed.
Like mentioned below, how long the website has been up can have an influence on ranking as well as other factors that you can be receiving credit for by not postponing the launch. In addition, SEO is a continuous effort that is never completely done, therefore I would recommend launching the website and then implementing your changes.
Can you give an example where it adds your URL as plain text to the code of the page?
I don't think leaving Disqus comments will harm, or benefit, your site SEO wise. I would feel free to comment as you would naturally, while not trying to comment unnecessarily for SEO benefits.
Wow - I have received an email like that recently, and was surprised that the person emailing me would want to take his link down - but now it all makes sense. It was a competitor all along!
Talk about Negative/black-hat tactics!
I have seen proof that white hat SEO leads to rankings.
I have not seen proof that Social Signals alone will lead to rankings. I agree with EGOL - you should focus your attention on the quality of the content, and possibly more white-hat link building, rather than going ALL-IN on social.
As a link builder - I would not pay attention to dofollow vs. nofollow ratios. Just go and try to get the best links you can, whether followed or no-followed.
As far as the anchors - I would personally allow the anchors to be as natural as possible, so when you ask for a link to a page from a webmaster, don't even include what you would like the anchor to be - just let them pick naturally.
While having your desired keywords throughout your webpage is an effective tool for helping SE results, it is by no means the only factor. Some have even suggested that as time passes, Google will continue to diminish the importance of parts of this strategy.
Even if it is not considered stuffing there are well over 200 factors that go into Google's algorithm. The loss in rankings can be caused by a number of potential issues. For example, poor quality links or other potential issues with the website may be hurting your results. It is difficult to determine the exact reasons without seeing your website. Another possibility is your competitors are utilizing more effective strategies in their marketing efforts to target those keywords, that is helping their website performance.