Welcome to the Q&A Forum

If OSE has not crawled that site, then they will not have that info. How long have you had them in your campaign as a compeditor? I assume that OSE exporer will crawl them next time since you have them listed.

I think you are correct in your thinking, but you also will lose traffic, i guess it depends on wether the traffiic is convertable, can you convert these vistors to your end goal?

If not then the traffic is off limited use, if so, then try harder to convert it, Maybe even try selling them what they want rather then what you have for sale. (assuming you are selling)

SE's can tell(for the most part) what is your content what is your header and what is your nav and footer, when looking for duplicate content, tehy are not concerned about the nav footer and header, they are concerned with your content.

I'm 50c each way to tell teh truth, the more i think about it

I'm 50c eatch way to tell teh truth, the more i think about it

As many as it takes to write a good piece on the given subject.

Pages do not need a lot of text to rank, Matt Cutts has stated. but having said that, the more text the more chance of long tails

Maybe its a sample.

but what i would do,is look at the souce code. there is a huge amount of script and menu content that could posible be removed. you content is almost at the bottom of the page. it looks like about 2% of the page. get rid of the scripts into external files, get rid of the menus and try to get original content up to higher %

Stay away, i think we have all been tempted once, but it is not worth it

Well you can 301, but one day you may go back to domianname.com and then you will need to redirect back.

I am not too clear also . But I assume if you have a link already to "/"and you 302, then "/" will keep rank. but if you get a new link, then the chances are it willbe to "/newpage.html"

all in all, i would go with the 302

Can i ask why you can not use "/"

I would go for A.

As you will want to promote it (backlinks), it is beter to have all your links point to one page rather then 10, splitting your efforts. You could use the locals in the link text to help them rank for geo locals. you could also list all geo locations on page

If you were getting #1 for all the pages io would suggest that they are very low number of searches for that term. Doing as I say above will proabbaly still give you #1 for the same terms.

Yes its seen as too different urls

http://perthseocompany.com.au/seo/reports/violation/the-page-contains-multiple-canonical-formats

If you are uisng a windows server (IIS), you can fix this easy by using the IIS url-rewrite addon. it had a rewite as lowercase preset

Yes thats duplicate content ok.

to you it is an advantageb to have duplicate content for each geo local, but for the uesre and search results it is not. image you havin the top ten results with these pages, what woulld people think of googles results. Of cause google does not want this.

If you use canonical then google will rank that page but not the others. in short its not going to work.

You are better of promoting the one page instead of splitting your efforts.

Well no one really knows for sure, but having a .nz website gives you a better chance with nz users, but it is only one signal. It does not mean that you will beat all .au sites, but if all other things are equal you will get the nod.

I would assume that for NZ users .nz would have a advantage, but real easte is very compeditive, and the .au domains will have all other things in their favour.

I am in Australia and i know that realestate.com.au and domain.com.au and teh like have very big budgets

with duplicate content, rather then beiong penanlized, it is more lilkly that you will just not get credit for both. But witch one will get the credit www or non www. To make sure of this you need to 301

you have links in your site pointing to images that use both www and non www. so search engines will follow them as if the are going to a new site. only being images may not be so harmfull. but lets say some one links to you, but use non www, then your www rankings will not benifit. futhermore the SE' will then crawl the rest of the site and then you now have a problem site wide.

buy the way even useing uppercase and lower case is seem as 2 different urls.

I see you 301 is in place, but you need to find all the refs to the non www and fix them

Yes thats one factor, but SE's see www and non www as different sites. Your rank is split between the 2. if you 301 one to the other then you merge any rank they have into the one domain.

this explains moztrust

http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/moztrust

Although seomoz do a good job at trying to gage these things, it is not to say that they see it the same way as SE's

I once was temped to get cheap links, and yes it worked for a time. i have about 200 links each for about 4 sites, over a few months they all dispapeared.

I did notice that your site is accessable via www and non www.

If you fix that with a 301 you may get the boost you need.

In google or bing?

I assume google, they will eventualy discount the links, Maybe

I would go for the "domainname.com/1-fc-nuremberg" version

Reason, google can pic words out of a url, but I doubt they can pick out that you want 1 and fc to be seperate.