Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I've bought and am using Screaming Frog successfully. Thanks for the direction, Eli.

This vaguely answers my question, so thank you. However, it has been almost 4 weeks since setting up the tracking list and Moz still hasn't picked up the links. Not only that, it has picked up several links that come from low-quality, spammy sites. The only thing I am getting from this experience is that Ahrefs and Majestic are much better than Moz and that I should not purchase a monthly subscription after the free trial ends. Thank you for your time, Eli.

Hey there! Thanks for reaching out to us! We have a great guide on how you can do this here: https://moz.com/help/keyword-explorer/keyword-research/ranking-keywords Feel free to reach out to help@moz.com if you have any other questions, Have a great day!

No, it would still count, as Medipartners-Google as a User-Agent is not Googlebot but a separate crawling engine for other Google services. So this one specifically doesn't have any impact on SEO.

HI seoelevated thaks again for taking the time to explain. That helps a lot and will adjust the site accordingly, it makes sense.

The same issue facing with my website the spam score in Moz is showing how to remove this spam score. idle heroes mod apk is this websit please check

I'm in the same exact situation as well!  Feels like we are kind of stuck as I also have different aspect ratios for device and use a CMS  that has a lot of limitations.

Hey there! Thanks for reaching out to us! You can find the relevant information here: https://moz.com/privacy-policy (In short, we don't) Feel free to reach out to help@moz.com if you have any further questions,

It's better to have pagination. too many link in one page it's not a good way and probably google robots can't crawl all of your links.

Hey there! Thanks for reaching out to us! I'm sorry to hear about this - would you be able to write into help@moz.com with a screenshot showing the issue please? Looking forward to hearing from you,

check how many backlinks the site in the top 5 positions have and start with that as a target

Nick, I went to that wiki page, and clicked through the link. While the page does redirect to a page which contains content stating "404 Page Not Found", in actuality that page is giving a 200 response, not a 404. In order for any broken link reports to work, the page would have to actually return a 4xx response code (404, 410, etc.). Here is the redirect path log from the Ayima plugin: Status Code URL IP Page Type Redirect Type Redirect URL 301 http://www.africatravelresource.com/africa/tanzania/c/zanzibar/nungwi/ 104.26.7.235 server_redirect permanent https://africatravelresource.com/africa/tanzania/c/zanzibar/nungwi/ 200 https://africatravelresource.com/africa/tanzania/c/zanzibar/nungwi/ 104.26.6.235 normal none none

To my understanding, GSC is reporting based on "field data" (meaning the aggregate score of visitors to a specific page over a 28 day period). When you run Page Speed Insights, you can see both Field Data and "lab data". The lab data is your specific run. There are quite a few reasons why field data and lab data may not match. One reason is that changes have been made to the page, which are reflected in the lab data, but will not be reflected in the field data until the next month's set is available. Another reason is that the lab device doesn't run at the exact same specs as the real users in the field data. The way I look at it is that I use the lab data (and I screen print my results over time, or use other Lighthouse-based tools like GTMetrix, with an account) to assess incremental changes. But the goal is to eventually get the field data (representative of the actual visitors) improved, especially since that's what appears to be what will be used in the ranking signals, as best I can tell.