Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Noup, there nothing wrong with the self referential canonical as long as it is consistent.

Hi there! Thanks so much for reaching out with this and sorry for the trouble. Our engineering team has deployed a fix for this and PDF reports should now be exporting as normal. If you're still having trouble with this, can you please send an email on over to help@moz.com so we can take a look? Thanks so much!

Hi there, Thanks for the question! Hi there! Tawny from Moz's Help Team here. These questions fall outside of product support and into SEO consulting. Unfortunately we don’t offer consulting advice through our support channels. Because we're not an SEO firm, we can't offer specific SEO advice on what might best help your site, but we do have a list of recommended firms, and a really awesome community forum full of SEO professionals who will answer your questions for free! If you are looking to build your own capabilities, we have several SEO classes and custom training options on the Moz Training page. Core classes include keyword research, on-site optimization, and link building. Check back often there as the class schedule updates regularly.

Hi Fubra, First thing that I can recommend that you do is to go into your AdWords account, then into the campaigns, then into the tab titled 'Keywords'. Once there, click into the tab titled 'Search Terms'. Once in the 'Search Terms' tab, you should see all the keywords that triggered your ad to show. In this tab, look for the specific keyword that is unwanted. Select this keyword by clicking on the selection box on the left and you should see a bar pop up that allows you to select what you want to do with this keyword. Select the option 'Add as Negative Keyword' and that should stop the ad from triggering each time someone searches for the unwanted keywords. Pro-tip: As part of your PPC optimization process, you should also be looking in the 'Search Terms' section of your campaigns/ad groups on a regular basis to see exactly what search terms are triggering your ads to show. There's bound to be search terms that are non-converters and also irrelevant search terms. By continually adding those to your list of negative keywords, you make your PPC campaigns more cost-effective. Good luck!

Hi there! Tawny from Moz's Help Team here. You can read all about how we're calculating those CTRs over in our Help Hub, here: https://moz.com/help/guides/keyword-explorer/keyword-metrics#organic-ctr I hope that helps clear up some of your questions! If there's anything else we can help with, just give us a shout at help@moz.com. Cheers!

Thankyou Soo Much. Great Post

Hi there! What Google is telling you is that you are indexing URLs that you probably are  not wanting to be indexed, or the other way around, that important pages are being blocked but indexed for other reasons. If I might ask, why did you blocked through robots.txt those files? There most 2 answers are: 1- Wanted to remove those from search results. If this is your case, you've solved only a part of the problem. What you should have done is (previously allowing robots to crawl those urls) apply noindex rules (keep in mind that can be set up in the HTTP header, as long as not html files cant have meta robots tag), then after a sufficient time block them in robots.txt.  _2- Optimize how GoogleBot (crawiling) time. _Being this case, then you've done it correctly and there is nothing to worry. Hope this help. Best luck. GR

Hey there Po! We'd need the full call to the API to check on this, not the code from your app that assembles it. I would recommend sending that full call to use at help@moz.com to keep your data private. Thanks!

Looking for a more in-depth response specifically to https://intrinsicallysafestore.com/product/intrinsically-safe-handheld-barcode-scanner-bartec-bcs-3600/ Thank you!

Glad to help!!

Hi Julie Yes, add a post and a link. Right click ‘view source’ and find the link. If it doesn’t‘ have rel=nofollow in the ‘a href’ it is do follow. regards Nigel

Agreed with Kevin on the timing - give it 1+ weeks after publishing on your site to syndicate it elsewhere. Unfortunately LinkedIn doesn't offer a canonical option that I'm aware of, unlike others such as Medium who I think are offering it. As a resutl, the LinkedIn post should have a citation back to the original post. Something like this: This post was originally published on our blog at https://www.norhart.com/blog/2018/08/08/great-leadership-is-about-influence-not-authority/ - take a look here at the rest of our XYZ insights on how to be a better leader. Putting this at the end of the post is fine. Italicizing or formatting it differently is fine. Adding or tweaking a call to action on why they should go to your site and subscribe or whatever is fine. Good luck!

I determined myself in a similar situation some years ago. Being a amateur all that search engine optimization stuff regarded too complex for me. I attempted to make head or tail of everything for parimatch myself at the beginning, attempted specific tools and companies.

Hi Ruth, I'm getting an alert in Moz Pro's analysis of my site about my Blog having duplicate content. https://pacificbeachhomes.com/blog/ It's because my blog shows 5 posts per page, so older blog posts spill over into "page 2" etc. . . and each of those pages has the same title and meta description. I read that the rel="prev" and rel="next" are not used by google anymore, and I also noticed that my site is not using it. Do you have any suggestions for my blog to avoid any duplicate content issues. maybe it's fine that the blog pages are similar?