Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Moz does not have a tool for traffic estimation, Ahrefs, and Semrush already have a traffic calculator, but keep in mind that they are just an estimations not real traffic.

Yes usually google display the order based on the hierarchy of the pages usually use the main menu and the internal links, but that just a personal observation In some case I saw some really deep internal pages on the first page probably based on the rank of the page. Also when I evaluated those result each tool show me different result Moz, Ahrefs, Majestic, Semruhs.

Hey there! I can't really take credit for this, but I found a Moz post from a while ago that might be helpful to you: https://moz.com/blog/how-to-allow-google-to-crawl-ajax-content Rob also links to a more recent article that he wrote on the subject that offered another solution. Hope that helps! Thanks! Mike

When you say 1300 landing pages are coming online every night that doesn't mean 1300 new pages are being created does it? Based on the rest of your comment I'm taking it to mean that 1300 pages, which were already live and accessible to Google, are being updated and the content is changing if appropriate. In terms of the specific situation I describe above, that should be fine - there shouldn't be a problem with having a system for keeping your site up-to-date. However, each of the below things, if true, would be a problem; You are adding 1300 new pages to your site every night This would be a huge increase for most sites, particularly if it was happening every night, but as I say above I don't think this is the case You are actually scraping key information to include on your site You mention an API so it may be that users are submitting this content to your site for you to use but if you are scraping the descriptions from some sites, and reviews from others that is what would be viewed as spammy and it seems like the biggest point of risk I've seen in this thread.

I agree with Gaston 100%... not only that but changing your URL is not only a major pain in the butt, if not done properly can severely hurt your SEO.

Great points by Roman and Tim! I'm willing to bet that this keyword is super competitive and you'll really need to dig in in order to rank for it. The things that I would start with: 1. Competitor analysis for the specific keyword (per Roman's recommendation) - evaluate 2-4 top competitors 2. Competitor backlink analysis 3. Optimize the indivdual product pages first - go for longtail keywords in order to try and get some organic ranking

Hi Dario, Yes, when revamping and improving your content... update the publication date too.  I cant assure you that Google will use it as a ranking factor, but it will help searchers in Google when they see the updated time. Yes, googleBot does recrawl every page of your site. If you think that it's been too long since visited that particular page, then you could manually request a crawl in Search Console: In Crawl -> Fetch as Google. Hope it helps. Best luck. GR

Implement schemas certainly can help you to gain some visibility but there are many factors to keep in mind if you go to the site https://schema.org/ you will notice that there tons of options. So not all the schemas available are supported by Google. In Fact, in your case, you should focus on schemas supported by Google, Facebook, Pinterest etc. Here you can find more information about the schemas supported by Google and Facebook https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/mark-up-content https://www.facebook.com/business/help/1175004275966513 So if you are working on a travel agency these are some schemas available for your content Local Business Articles Reviews Also, there are schemas for the business info such as logo contact info location social profiles

Hi, as long as your website is properly optimized for mobile SEO (for instance, if you use dynamic serving for the images, make sure you include the Vary-HTTP header to let Google know that you're doing that) using the same descriptions etc across all versions shouldn't cause any issues. You can also feel free to optimize each version differently if you discover (for example) that users use different search terms when searching for images on a mobile device versus a desktop. Bear in mind these are images, so you'll want to optimize for the image content, not the target keyword of the page that the image appears on. Hope this helps!

Thank you for the clarification Rajesh, much appreciated

Your website already is read by google. you can check here -  https://www.google.com/search?num=100&ei=UH_mW7OQE7KQ_Qa6iI2YCg&q=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Ftournet.co%2F&oq=site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Ftournet.co%2F&gs_l=psy-ab.3...43740.45330..46240...0.0..1.633.2661.3-3j1j2......0....1j2..gws-wiz.......0j0i131j0i10.F-kc8Vv_1xI And your site is not optimized properly. Ex. Your home page. Your home page is unable to translate, so I can't help you more.

Hi Christian, I'm sorry to hear about the issue. Here's what I would do: 1. Try to use a free xml sitemap generator (Google free xml sitemap generator) and manually upload it to your server and then submit that. That may involve turning off the Yoast xml sitemap generator. You can see if you still get the error 2. Try a different plugin to generate the sitemap - I'd recommend this one: https://wordpress.org/plugins/google-sitemap-generator/ If you are still getting the same error, I would take Everett's advice and call your web host.

http://www.seoroundtable.com/google-search-rankings-unstable-26583.html Many SEO's are reporting huge fluctuations in rankings refer to article.

Hey Elaine, It looks very likely that 404ing a page would indeed remove the impact of spam links to those pages. I found an older article where Google said as much: https://www.seroundtable.com/404-links-google-15427.html Around the same time, John Mu said about the same thing: https://productforums.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!category-topic/webmasters/crawling-indexing--ranking/C-OoaJfb0Yg Based on this, you shouldn't even need to disavow those links after 404ing the URLs. Hope this helps and good luck! Mike

no at all