Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

Latest Questions

Have an SEO question? Search our Q&A forum for an answer; if not found, use your Moz Pro subscription to ask our incredible community of SEOs for help!


  • Hi Chiaryn, That's a helpful link, but I use two different Moz accounts. I don't want to revoke the Moz token for both, just one, which isn't an option. While in another clients Moz I clicked "Connect another GA account" and it automatically connected to the GA email I was logged into, rather than prompting me to select what GA to login to. Now, this Moz profile that I am working on for a client can see 25 of my other clients--something that is not good. How do I disappoint my GA account(s) profile from just one Moz, not two? I sent an email to the help desk, but they ask for the 4 digit CC on file, which I don't want to have to ask the client for, they will think that is quite odd. Thank you, Todd

    Other Questions | | Propecta
    0

  • Hi Donna, yes I agree with you completely. If the marketplaces saturated for instance if you ever tried to rank for attorneys it's not easy. I no that Google is now taking your KML file from Google maps and long with your longitude and latitude to mark the map that is important information that you should have (The latitude and longitude is not being used by Google as to my knowledge yet however the KML is and needs it) I have a client that is a very competitive market right now in the city of Toronto not a extremely large city but not the extremely small city either and we're doing very well with local its not easy to do but you can rank with older companies thought to be an institution that could not be removed from Google's first place especially with universal ranking

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BlueprintMarketing
    0

  • Thanks everyone... It's not as restrictive as patient records... Basically, because of the way our health service works in the UK we are not allowed to promote material around our medicines to patients, it should be restricted only to HCP's. If we are seen to be actively promoting to patients we run the risk of a heavy fine. For this reason we need to take steps to ensure that we only target this information towards HCP's and therefore we require them to register before being able to access the content... My issue is that HCP's may search for a Brand that we supply but we have to be very careful what Brand information we provide outside of log-in. Therefore the content we can include on landing pages cannot really be optimised for the keywords that they are searching for! Hence why I want the content behind log-in indexed but not easily available without registering... It's a very difficult place to be!

    White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | stever999
    0

  • Just wanted to let you know we've launched a site that will help answer this question! http://health.moz.com/ is where you can go to see if we have any known major or trending issues. We just launched it today, and hope it helps for the next time we have a glitch.

    Technical Support | | KeriMorgret
    1

  • Thanks. I agree especially since there didnt seem to be much at stake..lol. I guess I just was unclear on the value of the internal links count in moz, I just started using the system...

    Moz Tools | | satoridesign
    0

  • You may be interested in this Slideshare by Wil Reynolds: http://www.slideshare.net/wilreynolds/the-10000-paid-content-paid-linking-test-that-is-100-google-safe Wil owns a large agency and tests out services like this including nRelate and Taboola. Some are better than others. As far as Google is concerned, as long as the links are "nofollowed" the recommendation services should be perfectly fine. In Wil's case, he used these services for link building, with mixed success. On the other hand, any content recommendation service that places followed, non-editorial links on the web is worth approaching with caution. I'm not familiar with the Engageya platform, but this is something I'd definitely check out first. Hope this helps! Best of luck with your content.

    White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | Cyrus-Shepard
    0

  • Ok, everything is back up and running. If you have any additional issues, feel free to email us at help@moz.com. Thanks, Jen

    Getting Started | | jennita
    0

  • Yes, I think it does.  We were hoping that we could just modify all the TITLES to: "Dialysis Center & CKD Center Los Angeles" to include the new keyword CKD Center.  Or maybe just do: "CKD Dialysis Center Los Angeles" and hope that Google will rank us for both CKD Center Los Angeles and Dialysis Center Los Angeles.

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ErnieB
    0

  • Hey Mike, Thanks for response I am not talking about any kind of reports at all... just have got confusion about the -ve & +ve keywords & URLs.....

    Branding / Brand Awareness | | barnesdorf
    0

  • Hi Guys, I'm having terrible difficulty hook up my GA account to my campaign. Does me make a difference if you have a number of GA accounts under one gmail account? Thanks John

    Other Questions | | JohnDigi
    0

  • Hi Christopher If you go to bing.com and enter linkfromdomain:yourdomainname into the search box it will show you all of the pages the site is linking to but does not show the actual pages the outbound links are going from. I have not used it but you could also use Xenu's Link Sleuth which you would need to download and install. I hope that helps, Peter

    Moz Tools | | crackingmedia
    0

  • Here is the link again. http://www.seobook.com/video-google-seo-friendly-page-titles If it doesn't work, just copy from here and paste into your browser.

    Technical SEO Issues | | Czubmeister
    0

  • I couldn't find it after some research. Maybe the error will dissaper after the next crawl. Normally you should be able to see the linking page. I'm sorry I couldn't help. I did find some other things on your website you might want to fix. I just sent you a PM.

    Other Research Tools | | Robnnl
    0

  • I'm going to guess your client got impacted b the Penguin 2.1 update.  It may well not be a case of your client getting penalized however as opposed to the other sites getting rewarded.  I've been up against Findlaw, etc ... they have good links. I have to guess that if we're honest - they have better links that your client and your clients links got devalued in the update.  So it's more a case of the client losing weight than directories being increased in value.

    Search Engine Trends | | BeanstalkIM
    0

  • The existing links could themselves lose MozRank, which would mean a lower MozRank score to the site that they linked to. Most sites will decrease in MozRank over time in the absence of new links being built.

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TakeshiYoung
    0