Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I think what we are all trying to say is... as always with SEO ...

Quality Trumps Quantity

hang on Cody... things not to do "write something readable" .... i think you've mixed two lists into one!

in my experience, and i've a fair bit with WP, the majority of malware comes from plugins which get updated and become infected themselves. Wordfence certainly can help with this problem, but a regular securi scan will too.

My advice is deactivate and uninstall any plugins you don't really need or use - this will make the site faster and more secure.

Once the malware has gone you can do as you have and ask for relisting or wait it out, google will come back and check. Manual reviews will take a few days to come back I believe, though it depends on the nature of the malware - if its believed to be complex it will be manual if its just one file being "naughty" a robot may scan your site to take a look that it's gone and it could be up in 24-48 hours.

Tom's point is spot on.

Syndication is a great traffic driver, no doubt - but it also means that the content usually worth a little less. Also implementing the canonical tag can be away around this but it will mean that the "copy" of the content will never get a chance to rank, though it will still drive some traffic.

The answer is always original content across the board - if you must repost on your own website use the canonical to point to the other site - show the love.

off topic: i was once asked "if i add a picture of a cute cat to any post would it become unique content?" ... answers on a post card to "sill questions here"

this depends on the size and nature of your site. For instance if you've lots of posts about a topic within your site (say "social media" or "email marketing") it is best to have them as a category and your post title to follow. Otherwise you could have issues in that you end up needing to put "email-marketing" in each post url ... which isn't pretty to do manually

Whilst some of it is better than it was, the way it deals with pages is still flawed.

For example most pages are using the url format .au/#!chauffeur-hire-perth/c1ay9

#! is a "hashbang" it means it's being dealt / served through javascript and as such isn't readable via search engines - in addition to this all pages have a canonical of the homepage and so would never rank anyhow...

As much as it may not be what you want to hear, its never likely to rank well - i certainly don't forsee it ever ranking in the top 3... sorry

--

Being transparent: I have never been one to support the likes of WIX or others of a similar nature. The templates they use are built to cover so many bases that it will never really please anyone completely. Also the way in particular WIX deals with pages is concerning in particular - others do it too i should add.

sorry to be the messenger of bad news.

most obvious thing is that they tend to link to one another heavily. use open site explorer to check the major links going through and see if one domain points to the others you are thinking about and then check the others.

also check their code and see if they are doing anything funny, like cloaking information - another common blog entwork trick

Personally I would say get rid of the bad links first, this is usually what Google clamps down on, a lot of internal links on your homepage isn't great, but isn't something I think Google would penalise for, rather they would just no rank you very highly in the first place.

Like I said, get rid of the links, see if that solves anything, if not, dig a bit deeper but priority would be the bad links.

only you can really test the position out, for different ads the conversion rate will change as for keywords i think.

You'd be best to check every 24 hours i would think rather than wait a few days - especially if you are paying more.

not necessarily, overall good rank factors would mean that semantically you end up in the same place - you maybe the best at your term but they are best at relating to that term (if that makes sense)

Comments from William and Darin show the two different types of blog commenting. Let me expand:

Type 1:

Commenting on any blog you can get your hands on linking back to your site (those that will let you): This is the kind of blog commenting that you should avoid like the plague. It will do you no good and will simply be a waste of time these days.

Type 2:

Commenting on blogs that mean something in your industry and commenting with content people want to read: Like with any kind of content, if it is content people want to read it can be valuable. If you are selling running shoes and you build your authority on an athletics blog and your comment is contributing to a conversation and a link to your site is relevant and valuable to the users then by all means this is the kind of blog commenting you want to involve yourself in and can be very beneficial in the long run.

Hope that helps.

As tom says 404 errors are not the end of the world.

if you are concerned then as long as the relative urls have remained the same and the root directory is all that has changes a 301 in bulk should work, though if you've changed categories or something it may not work so well as a single entity and 100 would be the way to go.

Something that you should do, if you've not already, is within webmaster tools make sure you tell Google you've changed your url (configuration > change address) - it also has a mini guide on the steps you should be taking, including to register your new domain on webmaster tools.

But again, as tom says, if it's not destroying the user experience and isn't a huge annoyance for visitors don't worry too much about it.

--

Just for your reference a full url redirect (aka changing say abc.com to abc.net - moving all directories and urls in one go) would look like

RedirectMatch 301 ^(.*)$ http://www.abc.net

I sniffy some billy bull in this article, not least because of the website itself clearly being anti-google... maybe they should have read the latest ruling from the EU regarding favourance of it's own services anot happening before it posts this stuff...

pinch of salt - and all that

interesting to note on it's about page it uses microsofts logo but the blog doesn't mention bing ....

pointing a folder would involve some DNS changes (to the CNAME record) - i think.

You would be best asking BC - it would be a similar process to pointing a subdomain to BC.

If you host a solution you are not always stuck in time, for example I use things like WooCommerce which is always being updated with new features and gives you great controls.

And just to clarify I am not saying that you cannot do the things YOU may want to do, but there are things that unless you've controls within the server you can't do - like implement GZIP for instance which can be a big deal on big sites.

Looking at the site it has been cached on the 1st February and is in english, have you recently changed it over to German?

It seems possibly that Google hasn't cahced the updated version of your site recently, you may just need to wait for it to be re-crawled.

not really my point - my point is categorisation on large sites is helpful to search engines and users. WP does this very well and I utilise it a whole bunch on my sites that use WP

fyi http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-tools-reports-stalled-16756.html

are those links in another navigation too?

If so remove them from your footer, it wont damage internal link juice flow as SE's tend to only look at the first link to a page from another page (aka having the same link 20 times on a page has no more effect than having 1 link to that page).

If they are not elsewhere I would consider looking at moving the nav to be more effective and reduce the number of links - for example instead of city you could have region or state etc.

Usually, you will find social media sites (of any type) will give no-follow links. So they don't (in theory) pass link juice - however, they are still helpful for ranking, getting visitors and even getting your site indexed.

The prime example of this is G+, through making sure it's not posted to other social media sites or to a sitemap, it is possible to see that when you make a post on Google+ to a new page or blog within a few hours it get's indexed / a robot visits - this is even faster if people comment about the post and share it. At least in my experience.

As SamCUK says though, build your author profile and show you are a real person with great content and the rest will follow. Great content and good use of social media will mean you will naturally build both follow and no-follow links (as of course does deliberate link building)

Ok generally < so not to miss any questions

The links you describe to some extent could be considered manipulated, unless they were sites previously and have since been redirected - which is perfectly valid. However, if they have always been redirects then they are unlikely to have gained anything from those links - In my experience if someone links to a page which is redirected since existence (and google generally knows this thanks to its vast database) then it is unlikely to pass juice - but as i said if it was say a blog post on another site but the site has since moved it will carry some juice.

If you want to investigate that further nip to http://archive.org/web/web.php and enter the url which is being redirected - go back into its history (across the top) and see if a page exists there or not.

So to your main question, are commentluv links worth it. Basically it's hard to tell whether they or any other comment system offering a similar function are worth it. As with many website comments in general the links maybe set to no-follow and so not worth anything to search engines, but thats not to mean they are totally worthless - people still see and click them.

And finally, my advice is never to just look for one type of link (such as one from commentluv comments) - it's the same with any kind of link, if you manipulate a search engine by biasing towards something hugely their worth to you will diminish and your time wasted.

always look at the bigger picture.