Welcome to the Q&A Forum

This feature would be a great addition to custom reporting!

That's a very good point.

Hi Alex, You can actually do both with any subscription higher than pro basic. This can be configured at the bottom of each campaign setting which will also have a link to 'global settings' if you needed to add one logo for all of your campaigns. David is also suggesting a great workaround Cheers!

The 410 Gone essentially means "I'm aware that page used to be here, but it has been taken away on purpose and it won't be coming back". Whereas 404 Not Found means "I don't know anything about that page - as far as I know it never existed". You can see how the first scenario applies to your pages much more specifically than the second. But as Tom points out, if you don't have the URLs in your sitemap or xml sitemap and nobody's linking to them, the 404s will eventually cause the Search engines to drop the URLs from their index. Frankly I'd just let the URLs drop and spend the time on something more valuable. Go earn a few more links Paul

I've not used any of these services. I have an account at myblogguest.com but found it difficult to make pest control relevant to the types of posts people were requesting. As with any SEO endeavor, you want to make sure that the links you get look relevant and natural. If the sites that have joined those networks are quality then I think it would be a plus. But I would be leery with the recent penguin update to have links from blog networks. Sooo.... it would all depend. (classic SEO answer). Are you getting the results you want from myblogguest.com?

They were ironed out for quite some time, and just yesterday we started having some problems with the CSV export. We're working on it right now, though it may be a few days to get all of the backlog caught up and things back up to speed. It is currently taking a couple of days for reports to generate right now. We're in the process of adding an alert to OSE to let people know about this. Keri

We had a large drop this week.

Hi Slava, Yes, that's a good point - I'll definitely look to re-purpose it after I'm satisfied I've promoted it as well as I can.

Thx for the list. I am working on an article directory list I plan to share in a week or two.

Vahe -  Thanks; I think I do need to tweak my pinging settings

Hey Alex, Did you end up using Sponsored Tweets? How were the results?

I agree about trusting Cutts, however I believe this one to be true

Got it - saw your other question. This is definitely a bit tricky.

Are you securing a lead-gen form? One thing to test first - have you done an A/B test of the in-page form vs. a large call-to-action button? I've seen testing go both ways. Sometimes, the in-page form drives more leads, but sometimes a clear call-to-action to a separate form is better (really seems to depend on the form and the industry). If the call-to-action works just as well, it would be much easier to secure the stand-along form than your home-page. Going secure full-site would help solve some problems, although you do need full-site 301-redirects then, and you've got to make sure your servers can handle it (https: needs additional overhead). It's really tough to tell without knowing the nature/scope of the site. I'd be happy to close the private question, but if you want to dive into details there, it might not be a bad idea. Seeing the site would really help, since this is a tricky issue.

I think I may do the same. Although the site doesn't have many thin pages, I'm gonna get rid of any that might seem unnecessary and see what happens from there. I've really gone off Pandas

Since starting this thread, it's apparent that Panda 3.3 is the culprit here

Hmmm, interesting reading. That could be the cause then - I assume it's live! Thanks for the info Marcus.