Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I have been seeing this exact same thing and also have been having this problem on and off for quite a while. It recently got worse again and when I contacted customer service, they just told me how to reconnect it. (Which I already knew from previous experience. I mentioned that I was not happy about this.)

I assume you are talking about learning basic html? Codecademy.com is good for this, but it is not in a video format.

Lynda.com has lots of videos, including one called "Optimizing your page for search engines" from "HTML essential training with Bill Weinman" (I know nothing about that video in particular-- I just did a search on the site).

Lynda.com costs money, but they do have a free trial you could take advantage of.

Meta descriptions play an important role whether or not they are counted in ranking. When done well, they can cause a searcher to click on your result over the others. If the clever description you write for your page is too long, it will get truncated or Google might choose to show something else entirely (which it might do anyway, especially depending on the search term). I like to use this tool when writing page titles and descriptions: http://www.seomofo.com/snippet-optimizer.html  It allows you to see what your result might look like in Google's serps (it uses 70 characters as the allowed title length and 156 as the allowed description length).

I get the same problem in Firefox 27.0.1. The odd thing is that it comes and goes even if I do not make any changes.

The keyword tool can do this. Research tools > Keyword and ranking tools > Keyword difficulty . You can enter up to 20 words at a time.

If you use the words Weber 522053 in the query, Google is likely to return the title with Weber 522053 in it, even if it doesn't return it that way for a different query, because Google sees that Weber 522053 is important to the querier.

But this does show that Google knows what the intended title is and is shortening it for its own unfathomable Google-ish reasons. (I did notice that Weber 522053 is not visible on the page at all, so possibly that is what makes Google think that it is not important information to display in the serps.)

The dates are a little tricky to find.

Click on "Links to Your Site" in the Webmaster Tools side menu, then click on any of the links on the page that comes up. This will bring you to a page with "Download latest links" as an option. Click on that and you will download a list of your links with "First discovered" dates.

I also like Majestic SEO, and it is free to use for sites you own. I use it in combination with Webmaster Tools and of course Open Site Explorer.

Since the error message you get is "no more than one canonical URL tag," I am going to go out on a limb and guess that the affected pages have more than one canonical.

You can check this by looking at the source code of the page (which you can do by going into the menu of whatever browser you are using and choosing "page source" or "view source"- it is different in different browsers- look around or use the browser's help feature) and doing a search for rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>"; this should only appear once. If it appears more than once, remove the ones you don't want.

The canonical should be the URL of the page that you want Google to see as the one to index and return in results. For example, if you are using canonicals because you have tracking codes appended to a URL and that creates the appearance of duplicate content, use the URL without the codes as the canonical one.

Just remember that when you put a canonical URL on a page, you are telling Google to ignore the actual URL of that page and consider it to be the canonical URL instead.

We currently put our videos up on our YouTube channel and then embed them on our site. We are exploring the option of self-hosting new videos and then "archiving" them on YouTube.

This might give some of the best of both worlds- no competition when they are fresh and more eyes when they are a little more mature.

In general, I think a non-standard top level domain does not inspire as much trust in users as the standard ones but I do not have experience with .pro domains (probably because they are not common).

One thing I want to mention (though I imagine you are aware of this) is that Google itself  just rolled out a new service, called "Helpouts" which is a live advice service online. https://helpouts.google.com/home

Big competitor!

Yes, I had the same problem as well, and the solution in the link did work for me. At least for a little while- yesterday I got another Analytics link broken notice. (Though that one seems to have stayed fixed.)

Absolutely; you should implement it anyway. Even if Authorship doesn't turn out to be as important as it was first thought it would be, it is another signal to Google.

There is some question about the fate of Google Authorship; in fact AJ Kohn says that the Authorship Project at Google has been abandoned and Google will be using other ways to extract identity from pages.

http://www.blindfiveyearold.com/authorship-is-dead-long-live-authorship

Thank you for your response!

I had looked at that article before I posted, and it also has this paragraph:

Googlebot can index almost any text a user can see as they interact with any Flash SWF file on your site, and can use that text to generate a snippet or match query terms in Google searches. Additionally, Googlebot can also discover URLs in SWF files (for example, links to other pages on your site) and follow those links.

This makes me think the link might be a problem. It is only one link out of a large link profile, so I am not too worried but it's always good to be prepared...

How do I tell if a link in a Flash document is follow or nofollow? Or doesn't it matter?

(I just found out that my company placed an advertorial in a Flash publication and I want to make sure it doesn't wind up as a paid, followed link.)

Thank you!

There was a similar question yesterday which was answered by Moz staff that might apply to your situation: http://moz.com/community/q/missing-campaign-after-billing-update

"We found a bug that is preventing archived campaigns from showing up in the UI and have a fix deploying that should resolve this soon, but I do have a workaround for you in the interim. After you log into Moz, type in:
pro.moz.com/campaigns
in your browser navigation window. This will take you to the archived campaigns. From there, just click on the Activate button next to the ones you want to bring back."

There is also information on internal links in Google Webmaster Tools; under "Search Traffic" in the left column, choose "Internal Links."

Looking at your code, I see:

name="robots" content="noindex,follow,noodp,noarchive,noydir" />

That page appears to be noindexed. Check your settings.

There was a question about this back in March; here are the links to the March question and the Google forums link.

http://moz.com/community/q/google-places-we-currently-do-not-support-the-location-2

http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!msg/business/OqKS72sqrzA/wP_h7yhEwL8J