Welcome to the Q&A Forum

It is recommended that you have no more than 100 links per page. Have you run the SEO Crawler across your site. This will give you a report including advice on number of links. In cases where there appear to be too many then it will flag that up. More importantly it will report other more important errors or omissions. I dont thin youre doing much wrong, though get the SEOmoz report and you will know better...

I'm going to chime in with what David said. Think about a number of impressions that is statistically significant to you. And don't add the exact match of a kw query until it hits that number. Or delete the exact matches that don't have that number of impressions. This makes for a lot easier organization and analysis in the long run.

I agree with Bevelwide, but as well as checking the authority scores I'd determine which page best appeals to your target audience, and which page they're more likely to visit!

Hi AJ. I was able to verify your site is indexed in google.co.uk. I disabled the flash on my browser and can see your html code appearing normally. It looks like you have a WP site with both Yoast and the All in One SEO plugins. There are some conflicts you should resolve. Currently your page has two meta descriptions and three canonical tags. These extra tags are not the root cause of your current issue, but they should be cleaned up. With your site indexed and your home page not showing up in SERPs for even targeted phrases this leads me to consider that your site may be under a penalty. I wish I could look at your site further but an issue just came up and I need to leave my office.

Thanks tomypro.

Admin note: answered in http://www.seomoz.org/q/google-one-button-help-needed-3

awesome, glad i could help!

The client does not want to be associated with a physical location making directory listings very difficult. Sponsorship is a great idea though.

If this was my client I would leave the content as-is. There will be no benefit to moving the content other then a cleaner URL. Yes the cleaner URL is preferred, but based on the backlink situation you described, it is not worth the move. If you were to undergo a CMS change or other situation which required a URL change, it would make sense to move the content at that time. If you didn't have many backlinks, or if you only had a small amount of content, it could also make sense to make the move.

As mentioned by Ryan I would move the content to the main site.  However I would rel canonical the blogger and blogspot posts to the new location.  This way you can boost the domain and still maintain the links that may have been created to the old content.

Well, you basically just described Basecamp but you need something like FreshBooks - http://www.freshbooks.com/ - for the invoicing part. Nothing I know of that does both parts though. EDIT: Maybe you try something you host yourself with a wiki software or something like - http://www.activecollab.com/ - or - http://collab.ws/. Basecamp alternatives - https://company.podio.com/ - http://www.zoho.com/projects/ - http://lighthouseapp.com/ - http://goplanapp.com/

Should i worry about this or will simply the otherone overcome it in time ? You have properly 301 redirected the non-www version of your page to the www version so it will fix itself in time. Your site has a very low DA so Google may only visit you once/month. If you would like to resolve the issue faster you can log into Google Webmaster Tools and set the preferred version of your site as "www". It is not necessary to make this change if you properly redirected your site, but the results would update faster.

Thanks Dan, I agree. Cheers.

Thanks for the answer I suspected that, I'll go back over existing sites and be sure to 301 sites going forward, cheers.

hi, Was the post on the main blog: http://www.seomoz.org/blog Or was it on You Moz user blog: http://www.seomoz.org/ugc The main blog has the title tag: SEO Blog | SEOmoz Blog Featuring Search Engine Marketing Tactics