Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Sorina, Thanks for the response. That makes sense as the content isn't completely duplicate.

Depending on the CMS you are using, you may be able to add a dynamic element to the URL when more than one filter is being used, for example noidx=true. Then utilize your robots.txt file to disallow all URLs with noidx=true. This should allow pages with one filter to get indexed and crawled, but when a user (or Googlebot) enables another filter, that page would not be entered into the index.

FYI by setting it to USA, you will more than likely lose ranks in other countries.

Hey Murthy, without your site details, I'm not able to investigate what may be causing our crawler to be blocked from your site. Can you please email your campaign information to help@moz.com so we can investigate the issue further? Again, we can't really investigate this type of issue through the Q&A forum.

Does this tool still work?  Tried adding it today and no joy.

Thanks Mike

I agree with what Peter said aboe, but I also want to add remember when creating content always think about answering the questions your customers might have about your product(s) or services. This will not only answer content question that many customers are always asking about, but it will also help you get the long tail keyword info that your company might need to battle hummingword.

No problems. Be interested to hear what the problem was if you're happy to share?

I change it but its still not working. https://www.facebook.com/garmentprintingUK You can see that there is not reviews yet.

Thanks everyone. Im looking into working more on G+ as well as all the others.

Thank you soo much Peter!

I would try to go with these HREFLang tags, if your environment and structure is set up right for this I'm of the view that this will really help new countries where you'll launch as you have the 'ability' to direct some of your authority their way via these tags. You have something similar for your sitemaps, where you can also point at the different languages for one page. Besides that I would put all my money and efforts on promoting your content and building up an authority in every single country.

Mozcast also record a spike in the Google weather between 1st and 3rd November, but there were bigger rises between 23rd and 28th October showing more changes went on during that period. http://mozcast.com/ Peter

Good Morning! Unfortunately, the results you are seeing are consistent with a tweak Google made a few weeks back that has brought up some extremely low quality one boxes. The tweak is surfacing many old, spammy results like the one you've highlighted. Here are two good discussions of this weird phenomenon: http://localsearchforum.catalystemarketing.com/google-local-important/10000-attack-bad-google-local-one-boxes.html The above forum thread in 8 pages long, and I recommend you read the whole thing, as it includes many examples and, also, some things people have tried in regards to reporting the bad results. Then, I would also suggest you read Mike Blumenthal's article in which he ties this tweak to the Hummingbird Update. Very smart: http://blumenthals.com/blog/2013/09/28/hummingbird-local-knowledge-graph-shitty-search-results/ And, if you'd care to read more on this topic, you might want to take a glance at: http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/webmasters/NMh_bk5MXX0 The problem is very widespread. Google is aware of it and I expect they will turn the dial again at some point to improve what is currently a very poor search experience. There may be some hope in reporting a specific instance, as you will read about in Linda Buquet's forum thread, but for the most part, this may just be one of those sit-tight situations that we have to endure until Google takes action. Hang in there.

Completely agree with Fede, the 301 process will redirect the juice to the new URL but this process always loose small amount of link juice. If you think adding the new URL will help you better than losing a bit of a link juice is fine!