Welcome to the Q&A Forum

At first it is said that google puts more weight on the top links of the web and that as it is downloaded it loses strength. It is a theory, really what you need are external links that point to the content of your page. These links must be of good quality in order to increase the AP of your website.

Doesn't this contradict that you can only have one or the other? "Multiple items on a page Multiple items on a page means that there is more than one kind of thing on a page. For example, a page could contain a recipe, a video that shows how to make that recipe, and breadcrumb information for how people can discover that recipe. All of this user-visible information can also be marked up with structured data, which makes it easier for search engines like Google Search to understand the information on a page. When you add more items that apply to a page, Google Search has a fuller picture of what the page is about and can display that page in different search features. Google Search understands multiple items on a page, whether you nest the items or specify each item individually: Nesting: When there is one main item, and additional items are grouped under the main item. This is particularly helpful when grouping related items (for example, a recipe with a video and reviews). Individual items: When each item is a separate block on the same page." https://developers.google.com/search/docs/guides/sd-policies#multiple-items

also the same issue with on this site université Maroc

Hi there, Yes, you can do that, but your listing might get suspended due to the same address. Ross

On the off chance that you take Burgundy explicitly, the outcomes scene is somewhat extraordinary with a greater number of pages positioning with explicit courses instead of visits accessible from suppliers. For your page title in principle, it would be conceivable anyway I would actually go more down the course of Burgundy Bike Tour - A Cyclists Guide To Burgundy. Again it is difficult to decide without seeing your page and space yet it seems serious, so it's difficult to pass judgment on your odds by page title alone. Education is important so Best IAS Coaching in Kolkata. Anyway as I would like to think it is shrewd to have it spread out more like this with the explicit term at the front and afterward extra related content in the wake of leaving space to catch related longer tail look and empowering commitment.

Also, it's hard to know if the markup is implemented correctly? Thanks!

Thank you for your help! I thought it was correct, just the Moz team not making it clear that it is a "them" problem, as opposed to a Google problem.

Hi there, I just want to be clear here. Do you mean that some of the categories were deindexed by Google? Ross

The redirect service is the gray area here for me. I don't know them or their services. With that parameter in play, you need the self-referring canonical. The hreflang is set up right now, but I don't know how all of this is interacting together. I'd suggest starting by addressing the hreflang with the parameters in them. Make sure those parameters are not in the hreflang tags.  Also, do you have sitemaps for both languages submitted to Google? For what it is worth, I don't see things wrong in the SERPs. You are still on the first page for 'NASA gifts' and 'meterorite gifts' in the US. What other drops are you seeing? Some adjustment is expected when making changes like this.

Hi Aspirant. these hyphens assume a significant job with regards to rank that particular watchword prefers in the event that you do it as such 'nderarmourfire-basketball shoe' google will search for basketball shoe catchphrase to rank rather than basketball shoes. Much the same as you see here best boxing gloves kept all the permalinks with hyphens and they are positioning. SO I will propose you to do something very similar to your site in the event that you need to up your positioning. On the off chance that you need further recommendations, you are welcome!

Any help?

UPDATE: It worked!!!!!! I'm so freaking happy! Love you guys!

Have you reviewed the reasons Google might exclude a page from the search results when accessing these reports in Google Search Console?  You can find them here: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/7440203?hl=en#information-status "Crawled - currently not indexed: The page was crawled by Google, but not indexed. It may or may not be indexed in the future; no need to resubmit this URL for crawling." "Discovered - currently not indexed: The page was found by Google, but not crawled yet. Typically, Google tried to crawl the URL but the site was overloaded; therefore Google had to reschedule the crawl. This is why the last crawl date is empty on the report." To Do: 1. Check your server logs for errors (esp. 500 response codes) or downtime reports for intermittent outages. Maybe your host is "throttling" traffic? 2. Add more value to those pages. Google may have no trouble finding and rendering a page, and still decide it isn't up to their standards for inclusion in the index. User-Generated Content is often very thin. Real estate listings are usually comprised of the same data everyone else has access to. What makes yours better or different? Is that communicated to Google somehow?

Hi Dana, You can flag that comment, but I do not see that Moz is taking any actions against these accounts. Ross

Glad to hear. Hopefully mine will too, but it's been 6 months already and still showing the old brand name as a suffix.

Np

Thank you for your answers. One more question: I read articles that google, when taking about E-A-T, although it treats subdomains as a separate domain, it still knows that this is still somehow connected with the main domain, so the subdomain will still negatively  affect main domain rankings almost the same as having the forum in subfolder. If that is true, then I come with the below situation: 1. The main domain wont get back its old - great  rankings by removing the forum from subfolder to subdomain. 2. The forum that 15 years now is the best in country with thousands of posts and visits, it will loose it;s traffic, too. Confused!! Any opinions on that?

What it will break is the ability to indicate that a place is closed over lunch-time with a single OpeningHoursSpecification node, which works currently because you can simply sort the times for opens/closes to reconstruct the intended order, like so: <code># opens 8:00 - 12:30 and 14:00 - 20:00 opens 08:00:00 closes 12:30:00 opens 14:00:00 closes 20:00:00</code> if you allow <code># opens 20.00 - 02:00 next day opens 20:00:00 closes 02:00:00</code> then there can be cases that become ambiguous, e.g. i. if you use more than one pair per OpeningHoursSpecification without making the case undecidable, like so: <code># opens 8 - 16:00 and 21:00 - 9:00: next day opens 08:00:00 closes 16:00:00 opens 21:00:00 closes 09:00:00</code> It could also mean opens 8:00 - 9:00 and 21:00 - 16:00 next day. What might work is a rule that cross-midnight intervals are only allowed if you have exactly one pair of opens / closes properties. And we need to precisely define how this works in the light of additional statements for the next day of the week, in particular with validity constraints (like seasonal opening hours).

You are welcome! Good luck.

Happy to help Good luck!