Questions
-
URL Parameters to Ignore
I agree with what is said above, in addition you could also add the ignore parameter in GSC. As it 's basically adjusting the page content based on that. It's a bit unclear how much information that is really sending to the crawlers but it probably can't hurt.
Technical SEO Issues | | Martijn_Scheijbeler1 -
Conditional Noindex for Dynamic Listing Pages?
Hi, I would advise against this for a couple reasons. First of all, dropping and re-adding pages to the index isn't quick, it often takes weeks before Google will obey a noindex tag. Second, even if it were quick, is going to cause problems at the authority level - is your site a trustworthy source of information? This week, yes, next week, no. It's best to have long-term content that can build trust/authority over time without ephemeral. An alternative approach you might take is writing content about the particular trials offered, this will help prevent thin content. You might also consider adding a call to action on empty pages that prompt users to provide an email address and you'll notify them when trials of type XYZ have opened back up.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | LoganRay0 -
Backup Server causing duplicate content flag?
That's a great point -- I've been thinking about that. My only concern is that doing a conditional noindex, might send confusing messages to Google. What are your thoughts on this? Appreciate the help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | yaelslater0 -
Google My Business Question
Hi There! My latest Moz blog piece might help you: https://moz.com/blog/delete-gmb-listing If you still have questions after reading that, please definitely ask.
Local Listings | | MiriamEllis0 -
Google's Knowledge Panel
Hey There, Are you talking about the "people also search for section" that shows up when you see a knowledge panel? Please, let us know which specific data you are referring to in the knowledge panel. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MiriamEllis0 -
How to mitigate impact of retiring 20,000 old URLs from the previous website version (migration was in 2015)
So as I mentioned I would never delete a page without a redirect (even if that is a redirect to the homepage). If you do that, there will be a minimal amount of authority that you lose. There's no way to know exactly how much, but it should be marginal. As for the referral traffic, I mentioned how to measure that above. But again with a 301 redirect, you will keep that traffic and if it is still relevant traffic, it should still add to your bottom line.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NicoleDeLeon0 -
Video and text article on same topic but on two separate pages...
what should we do to make sure that we aren't diluting our ranking power? If I was in a low competition niche then I might be able to get both pages ranking in the top ten. If this is in moderate or higher competition, then I would be afraid that I was going to war with a rubber knife.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EGOL0 -
Recovery from a HTTP to HTTPs migration using 302s ?
Hey, If you check today's whiteboard Friday with Dr. Pete (https://moz.com/blog/arent-301s-302s-canonicals-all-basically-the-same-whiteboard-friday), he mentions this case: "Some types of 302s just don't make sense at all. So if you're migrating from non-secure to secure, from HTTP to HTTPS and you set up a 302, that's a signal that doesn't quite make sense. Why would you temporarily migrate?" So answering your question, Google probably considered your initial http -> https redirects as 301.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Keszi0