Welcome to the Q&A Forum

In 29 I'm seeing it under customize and there's a "Title Bar" button in the bottom left corner.

It's definitely not ideal but as long as they're all showing the same author I don't think it will cause you any issues. I've seen many other sites where authorship is showing in search results and the yhave multiple rel="author" tags in their source code.

You can use screaming frog for this but you need to have the paid version which is £99 per year. It can also do tons of other things and I highly recommend it.

This article explains how to use this to see if links have been removed which will also tell you if they still exist.

It's because your meta descriptions are improperly formatted.

Yours are formatted like:

description="We make it easy to send emails triggered by user behavior. Build, measure and improve your emails to activate and retain users" />

but they should be like:

If for some reason you don't want to redirect www.michelangelohotel.com then you can just add a meta robots tag in the header of every page that looks like this:

Although you said that they would point www.michelangelohotel.com to www.starhotel.com/en/michelangelo-hotel-new-york which would generally means that it is being redirected so anyone that types in www.michelangelohotel.com will end up at www.starhotel.com/en/michelangelo-hotel-new-york

The best tool that I know of that would do that would be the redirects tab under links in Ahrefs. If that's not showing you what you want, then I'm not confident that you will find another tool that will.

A chrome extension that could be somewhat helpful to follow redirect paths and see what types of redirects are being used is: Redirect Path

P.S. Thanks for asking this question because it helped me to realize that my site's .htaccess file somehow got deleted recently and my 301 redirects weren't working.

You're probably not using google.ca. It ranks slightly lower on google.com.

I would imagine that because Chevrolet is part of the brand name that it shouldn't cause any issues but using Chevy might be more beneficial anyways.

Also if I recall correctly from when I did keyword research for a Chevy dealership/parts seller, Chevy was actually searched just as often if not more often than Chevrolet. Obviously that's subject to location though.

It looks like there are two issues.

The first issue is that Firefox and Chrome are treating the padding differently. Firefox is padding from the bottom of the text of the navigation whereas chrome is padding from the top of the containing div.

The second issue is that your site appears to be adding hardcoded css via javascript which is why you don't see that style in the source code. It's being added by a script executed in the browser after the site is loaded.

I want to clarify something that I think would help to better answer the question. Is this showing in the meta description in the source code on the pages or is it just showing up in Google's search results?

If it's in the source code then you obviously can change it, although it may be somewhat difficult depending on the cms.

If it's only in search results and not in the source code then it's going to be a lot more difficult to get rid of. This is something that Google is detecting on your site and automatically displaying because it think that it's beneficial to searchers.

If I understand correctly the executives at your company want to use the domain that the current event site is on to create an umbrella site, but you want to keep SEO strength of that site but on a different domain?

I don't think that that would work how you want it to, because as far as I know once you take that 301 off, all of the links leading to the original domain are going to start counting towards that umbrella site and the even site will likely drastically drop in rankings.

The temporary might help to boost the new domain for the event site, but it's definitely a complicated situation and I'm not sure that there's a good way to go about it.

Also, you mentioned a blog at the beginning of your post but after reading it, it kind of seems somewhat irrelevant to your question.

If you go to site settings in webmaster tools you can set your geographic target to United Kingdom which may help.

I would be wary of most services that are charging under ~$1000 a month total, not necessarily on a keyword basis.  I would also highly advise against using an overseas agency, you're more likely to get screwed than to get a good deal in  my experience. I would suggest checking out Moz's recommended agencies or agencies that are active on Moz and other SEO related blogs/news sites.

This is definitely tough because you are an online business, which generally means more competition. Hopefully you're in a fairly specific niche that isn't super competitive.

Good Luck!

I definitely wouldn't canonical them because as far as I can tell the content on the individual client pages is unique.

Honestly I don't see why you're worried. The pages all have unique content and contain no external links. If the main client page contained direct links to the clients' sites then I could see their being an issue but you shouldn't have to nofollow internal links.

Yep, it's definitely schema that Indeed is using to get that snippet. You'll see on http://www.indeed.co.za/Picker-Packer-jobs that the

for each row uses the itemtype="http://schema.org/JobPosting" property and the tags are using properties like itemprop="hiringOrganization".

Schema is a little confusing at first but it's actually fairly straightforward once you get it figured out.

For adzuna.com it looks like google might just be recognizing that it's a search results page and pulling the "Results 1-10 of 14" that's displayed on the page.

Not really an answer to the question but I just googled "hot vs not" in incognito and this page is the second to last result on the first page, which is mildly interesting.

As far as I can tell Webmaster tools doesn't take into account http vs https it only looks at domains/subdomains so you shouldn't need to do anything on that front. Whenever you make a large change like that it usually takes a little bit of time for everything to get settled with Google and get back to normal.

So I would say that you shouldn't need to do anything else. You just need to wait and everything should get reindexed.

I'm confused as to what your question is. I'm assuming it's related to a meta refresh or some error related to a meta refresh but you haven't really specified what you mean.

In regards to the email on that page it looks like someone added an on click event for event tracking in google analytics but that should be irrelevant to a meta refresh. The email itself is coded incorrectly, which is why you'll notice clicking on it redirects you to the homepage(at least in firefox and chrome). The "http://" needs to be removed and probably replaced with "mailto:" so that it's "mailto:sheira.gorris@fdmgroup.com"

The content seems to be working fine for me on desktop and mobile.

Did you change domains when you changed themes or were you always http://www.securityjobsuk.co.uk/ but with better rankings? I ask because your domain authority is pretty low (18) and generally sites with that low of a domain authority don't rank at all.

The only other issue I can see is that your logo/sitename is sitting in a sitewide h1 and every page I looked at had at least 4 h1 tags, which is definitely not advised. Any page should only ever have one h1 and the logo shouldn't be a sitewide h1, at least in my opinion. That may be at least part of your issue.

I'm assuming your noindex tags looks something like

name="robots" content="noindex,follow"/> or name="robots" content="noindex,nofollow"/>

and you have them on every single page that you don't want google to index?

How long ago did you do this because this a process that could take awhile, especially with 196,000 pages?

If it's been awhile and it's still doing this, you can also restrict these pages in your robots.txt so that Google doesn't crawl the pages at all.

Here's a blog related to this from google's webmaster central: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2007/03/using-robots-meta-tag.html