Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Jamie,
Maybe neal is right and you just clicked on your Marty McFly Nike boots ready for the weekend?
but seriously, Roger is obviously having a little timing issue there. I noticed the same thing on my report and have emailed the SEOmoz help team to make sure that they are aware of the problem. It is always a good idea if you notice that Roger is having a bad day to email help [at] seomoz.org and let them know.
Have a good weekend,
Sha
Hi,
The major concern with you adding so many new URL's to the 301 list every day is the potential for processing bottlenecks which might adversely affect site performance.
If you have a database behind all this (and it is hard to imagine with this many products that you would not) AND if you can match an old-id to the new product then you could try:
RewriteBase /
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f [NC]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d [NC]
RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} ^/(.)/(.)$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^/(.)/(.)$ /redirect.aspx?oldid=$1 [R=301,L]
Where redirect.aspx would
Hope that helps,
Sha
Hi Kris,
An alarm bell rang for me when you mentioned that your focus here is on the effect upon PageRank. You should be very careful in attributing the change in Pagerank to the implementation of the 301 as Toolbar PageRank is updated infrequently and in a very ad hoc fashion. This means that there may have been other things which occurred over the period between PageRank updates which were responsible for the change.
Rand gave a very good explanation of the vagaries of PageRank and the differences between the two types of PageRank in this Whiteboard Friday recently - What is Google's PageRank Good For?
Given the changes that have occurred recently in the world of search, I would be looking fairly carefully at the possibility that some of those changes may be responsible for any negative impacts on the site. Also, has there been a negative impact on traffic and/or rankings? These things are really much more important than PR.
Hope that helps,
Sha
Hi Vince,
Just to clarify, I'm thinking that perhaps the list of links may be 404 (or similar) errors that you want to fix?
If I am correct, and you have found the list of broken links in the SEOmoz Pro App, then you can locate the source URL's by exporting the error report as a csv, then looking at the information in Excel. If you locate the error in the list (by searching), then go to the very last column "Referrer" to find the source page.
Below is a screenshot of the Pro Tip from the help file, which is located on the Crawl Diagnostics help page
Of course, if my assumption is incorrect, then we just need you to be a little more specific about where the list came from and what you are wanting to achieve.
Hope that helps,
Sha
Oh my goodness Dave,
I just saw your question and then noticed the date you posted!
Do you still need help with your question, or have you resolved the problem? (I really hope so)
If not, let us know.
Sha
Hi Don,
There are some things you can do to optimize your product feeds.
There is some specific information about optimizing feeds for Google in this Q&A thread Does anyone have any tips for optimizing your Google product feeds?
CPC Strategy are quite generous with information to help site owners who wish to manage their own feeds in their blog. There is some information about Bing feed optimization on their Blog in this Tip of the Day post.
Hope that helps,
Sha
LOL..nice suggestion EGOL, although I fear there might be some pretty significant Bounce as a consequence of disappointed surfers not finding what they were expecting.
oops...did I say that? 
Hi Kadira,
If you enter your domain without a trailing slash ( www.yoursite.com or yoursite.com depending whether you are targeting root domain or the www subdomain) then your campaign should launch.
If you have tried this and still cannot get it to work then there may be a problem specific to your account. If this is the case it is best to email the help team help [at} seomoz.org and describe the problem so that they can take a look at it for you.
Hope that helps,
Sha
Hi Shawn,
It is inadvisable to use more than one method of blocking bots from specific pages on your site.
There is a very good explanation of this in this blog post from Lindsay - Robot Access and Indexation Restriction Techniques: Avoiding Conflicts. Definitely worth reading!
Hope that helps,
Sha
Hi Gabo,
As Shelley advised, there have been a number of people experiencing some issues with the keyword ranking tool. Best to email the SEOmoz help team help@seomoz.org and advise them of the problem you are having and the specific campaigns where it is happening.
Sha
Hi Jesse,
Basically, the only significant search volume is for the shorter two word term "minneapolis massage", so there is no benefit in going for the longer term (which also has a negative correlation for rankings).
So, since Ryan advised that the .net version of minneapolismassage is available, if you are wanting an exact match domain that might be a better option.
Since the return you are wanting is quite modest, then the traffic afforded by that term and the little extra you might attract from other terms should work for you if you can get some reasonable rankings.
I would suggest that you put some good effort into local search optimization if you decide to go with that domain.
Hope that is clearer,
Sha
Hi Antonio,
The best way to check if the site is using cloaking is to go into your Google Webmaster Tools acccount and "Fetch as Googlebot", then compare the code to see if googlebot is being shown the same code as the user.
However in this case, I would suggest that your concerns are being prompted by the use of CSS to hide text within the page so that it is not visible to the user.
I located this in your main.css file
#homepage-content {
position: absolute;
height: 1px;
width: 1px;
overflow: hidden;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
Basically, this is a massive amount of text which has been shoved into a div that measures 1 pixel x 1 pixel in the top left corner of the page. This is a practice which is not viewed kindly by search engines.
As to improving optimization there are a couple of things that are fairly obvious:
Using Flash for the rotating images is not our preferred option for a couple of reasons.
First, any user with an Apple iOS device will see only blank spaces as these devices do not support Flash.
Second, bots are not able to retrieve information from Flash documents in the most cases.
jQuery is a much better option as the presentation is visible to everyone and also allows you to obtain some SEO value from image file names, alt tags and inserted text.
The majority of the images in the flash presentation do not really represent what people expect from a "Resort". If you want people to convert then you need to engage them and I think that the images that are being used now are not helpful in selling the product.
Hope this helps,
Sha
Hi Aaron,
Your 301 redirect is working fine and sending all non www traffic to your www subdomain, so there is no harm to your SEO. The potential for that was explained by Ed in his reponse.
Google has simply indexed your non www root domain before you put the 301 redirect in place and has not picked up the redirect and adjusted the index as yet.
If you have not already done as Nico suggested and advised Google in your Webmaster Tools account which is your preferred domain, then you can do this. It is likely to enable Google to pick up the 301 more quickly, although I have heard Googlers refer to it as a "hint" which means that you should not hold your breath, or be overly concerned if you do not see a change in the results page straight away.
Bing also has the same function in Webmaster Central.
Sha
Hi James,
www is a subdomain. The root domain is the non www version.
As far as I'm aware you cannot change the setting once you have created the campaign. There is certainly no option that I can see in the campaign settings screen.
If the definition above does not clarify for you then best to email help@seomoz.org so that SEOmoz staff can take a look at it for you.
If you haven't already caught up with it, there is quite a lot of really good information in the Pro Help Files
There are also a few pre-recorded webinars on the SEOmoz Webinars page as well as a link to register for the Weekly Intro webinar that happens every Friday morning (Seattle time). I found all of these to be very helpful when I started out my Pro account.
Hope that helps,
Sha
Hi Kyle,
Have you manually checked the URL's reported in Webmaster Tools to check whether they are actually returning a 403 for users? I have often seen errors that were temporary or have already been fixed still being reported in WMT for sometime afterwards.
If you have checked and the pages are working fine then the problem is most likely due to a lag in updates in WMT so you can ignore it and wait for it to go away.
If you have checked manually and find that there is in fact a 403 problem on the site, then you will need to investigate further. Since you are relating the sudden flood of 403's to the addition of the 301 redirect, the first thing I would do is check that the code for your 301 is correct.
Hope that helps,
Sha
I copied this from your home page:
Autodesk, Inc., announced that Energizer Holdings, Inc. (Energizer) — a company whose portfolio includes such globally recognized and trusted brands as Energizer batteries and Eveready flashlights — has adopted Autodesk Vault data management s is oftware to more efficiently manage its product design and manufacturing
Paste it in to Google and check the results. You will see that the same article appears on many other sites.
Sha
OK,
Here's 3 alternatives off the top of my head.
We are Online Media Direct, a UK based Internet Marketing company. We pride ourselves on being a specialist in online marketing.
We are specialists in online marketing. Our UK based Internet Marketing company is Online Media Direct.
Online Media Direct is not just another UK based internet Marketing company. We pride ourselves on our outstanding record as a specialist in online marketing.
Only guessing at the precise keys, but hope that helps,
Sha
OK...that makes it more difficult.
I was hoping that you might have some files whose filenames would be retained and would only need to move from one directory location to another within your new site structure.
Since it is possible to redirect the entire contents of a directory to another directory with a single line of code, this would have made it easier.
Sha
Hi Garry,
Everybody else pretty much covered the other bits.
As to where I'm coming from - my background is in journalism and advertising. As such, I believe I have a fairly good understanding of how readers interact with text and what affects them both positively and negatively.
Some examples of errors:
"Our Qualified internet marketing experts are available to improve your company's fortune online using many different online based marketing techniques. We have proven results from years of work in Internet marketing and have a wide range of clients in many different industries."
"Our service is geared towards providing small to medium sized UK businesses an affordable solution to SEO."
"Contact us today to gain an insight as to how we would manage your company's SEO campaign."
"Plus more importantly help deliver your company a good return on investment."
There are quite a lot more and a lot of poorly constructed sentences that stop the flow of your message ...every roadblock like this that you put in front of the reader will reduce comprehension. If they don't understand the message they are unlikely to convert. 
Hope that helps.
Sha