Welcome to the Q&A Forum

You are asking this question, which means you already know and I am presuming retaining the same URLs is not a possibility. Even if it's a slim possibly, I'd suggest looking into it further. If not, then as long as you can 301 each and every URL to the new target URL, you should be fine. I have seen a +/- 10% Dip in traffic and rankings (if any) and it all varies on the authority and strength of your website. If you say, you are ranking well with some traffic, it definitely has some strength and I would not worry about moving it as long as you are prepared for it, in terms of redirects and maintaining similar or better On-page SEO and Internal Link Juice. Typically, when CMS's change, so does the internal link juice etc and that can have an affect even if you do the redirects fine. So you need to do an Audit of what's before and after, how optimized is the after compared to the before and what does your competition look like (if any).

I hope this helps.

You also need to do a complete SEO Audit of your website along with a Keyword Analysis to ensure you are using the right set of keywords, industry keywords, brand keywords, competitive keywords and see if your website structure supports it. I agree with Mihai on your backlink profile. It looks like for the past year and a half you have been caught in pretty much each algo update, primarily because of your back link profile as well as your site structure, optimization techniques.

Start with a complete SEO Audit of your off-page as well as On-page structure.

I would ask you this question. Does your website have a decent number of other good links ? Does your website have a lot of good quality content ? Do you spend over a $1000 per month on marketing the website ? And if this $300 is a part of this month marketing expense, go for it. If however, you could use that money to build some more / better content, that would be a lot more worth over time.

Directories like Yahoo, BOTW and some others, it just depends in the situation and circumstances of that website whether it makes sense or not. Unfortunately there's no simple yes or no in my opinion.

I hope this helps you resonate with yourself and decide.

OMG, looks like there are results all over the web with those links. See:

https://www.google.com/search?q=allinurl%3A%26tag%3Dvebidoo_com-21

I'd suggest you make sure yourdomain.com/randomurl.html contains a canonical to itself. That way, if somebody links to yourdomain.com/randomurl.html&tag=vebidoo_com-21, Google will ignore it. You can also add it as a ignore parameter in your Google and Bing Webmaster Console.

I hope this helps.

Honestly, the ones that you can pay to remove, pay them and be done with it. There's a lot of companies that were out there and still exist before Google's disavow tool even existed. Worst case scenario, just submit a reconsideration request after you have done what you can and move on. Spend your time and money building new content and enhancing existing content and whatever else is part of your online marketing strategy. I wouldn't worry about these 15-20 links out there. Don't let those 15-20 crappy links haunt you. You did your best in trying to remove them.

Also, if you were to change your URL, it will technically work for your URL, but not for your domain. As others said, the links will not point the benefit to your tshirts.html page but will to your domain name. Also, the redirect in case you delete the page and redirect to the homepage will actually hurt your homepage. So I would let it be a 404 if that's the route you'd prefer.

Well, the copy on your pages and any other content often leads to combinations of keywords, long tail that you end up ranking for that you did not / could not even target, because a lot of times, you don't even know those keywords exist.

So yes, when you have SEO optimized content or any content for that matter, as the pages/domain gain strength and authority, they tend to start ranking for a lot of keyword combinations.

I hope that helps.

Install the Yoast SEO Plugin.
Go to Permalink Settings under SEO.

And Set:

Redirect attachment URL's to parent post URL. Attachments to posts are stored in the database as posts, this means they're accessible under their own URL's if you do not redirect them, enabling this will redirect them to the post they were attached to.

I hope this helps.

Long story short, if you can host your sub-domain in a sub-folder, it'll be better. However, a lot of times for security issues and hosting constraints, companies end up hosting blogs on separate domains or sub-domains. I'd suggest you look into reverse proxy. That can make your blog URL look like yourdomain.com/blog

I hope that helps

It's usually a combination of both. Sometimes you see gradual movements in SERPS, but then what you may be seeing is something like a "Getting out of the Sandbox" effect. It's what used to happen very very widely and to some extent, still does. Brand new site tend not to rank for a considerable amount of time, often referred to as the Sandbox period and then once they get out of sandbox (after attaining some domain authority), you'd technically see a spike in traffic and rankings and your situation might be something similar to that.

Looks like a problem with Wordpress. Are you using any SEO Plugins like Yoast or something ? I'd suggest reaching out to your Wordpress Guy and have them look into it. It's clearly an issue, and needs to be fixed. You can also download Screaming Frog SEO Spider and crawl your website with it to see where Google is finding these links from. It could also be an issue with your Theme or Permalinks. These are the only areas I can think of. You are using the latest version of Wordpress, so you are good from that point of view. So has to be a Plugin, Theme or your Permalinks settings.

Are you being beat for all your keywords ? Or let's say most of your head terms ?

Just use your links in those press releases like "Brand Name" linked to "http://www.example.com" and so on. You can also do plain links like http://www.example.com and so on. I hope this helps.

P.S. Any one kind of links, when you over do them, they become unnatural links. Specially when they become a higher percentage of your overall link profile.

That is not through the campaign, it's through the Crawl Test Tool at http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/crawl-test

The descriptions you see in the SERPS are tweaked, changed and snippets of text from your page are used and what gets displayed depends on the user's query. Lets say your page is ranking for two keywords. Red Widgets and Blue Widgets. If Google thinks your Meta description is related to Red Widget's, they will use it. For Blue Widgets, if they find something else on the page that might be better, they'll use that.

For a lot of niche products / categories, it can be better. The rankings are dependent on multiple factors and although a site like wikipedia could be ranking for everything towards the top...similarly like amazon or pinterest or ebay and so on. The stronger authority domains do have that advantage, like a brand would. But then a niche product/category might have much better focused copy, a lot of internal links to this page from within the website, making this a stronger page.

Does that help and make sense ?

Greg The crawl is limited to 10,000 (Total) for all your 5 campaigns. As far as whether or not Roger-Bot should ignore Noindex - Here's what I think - I think the intent of that tool here is to find issue. In this scenario, Roger bot is making sure you are aware of the fact that some of those pages have a noindex. Roger does not know whether it's intentional or not. You can also do a deeper crawl and do a deep dive into your website by using Screaming Frog SEO Spider http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/ It does a great job of doing a deep crawl when you want it since it's a desktop software and you can set all sorts of options and identify issues.

I just had a link at one of their embed codes. Except a 300 characters snippet/excerpt, everything else is being served via a javascript. Links are shortened using their own URL shortening service and the images also look like hosted by their API.

I don't see any duplicate content issues.

From an advertiser/content provider perspective: Big brands have a decent possibly of getting brand exposure for their content without worrying too much about duplicate content issues.

From a publisher perspective, if you have the audience for a specific kind of content, you sure can pull some content, but it would neither hurt nor help you towards your SEO/content.

Yes, it syre can be the optimized copy, internal links, theme of your site. So if your site is only about Widgets, you have 100 different kinds of Widgets and that's all you sell. In that case, all your internal links, categories are focused around Widgets. That gives you an edge if your other factors are strong, you could be ranking better then your competition, the stronger competition.

Also, the volume of links do not matter. In this case, you might have 10 Widget related links from other Widget sites, which the bigger competition does not have, making you a better suited site ranking for that term. This logic might be totally different for another term.

I don't think you can initiate a crawl, but you can use the Crawl Test tool to see how it looks.

http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/crawl-test

Ready to crawl? Our Crawl Test helps you zero in on duplicate content, summarize redirect locations, learn rel-canonical values, and more. Enter any subdomain below and we'll crawl up to 3,000 linked-to pages. In the next few days you’ll receive an email containing a CSV report with the results.

I like what "Optimize and Monetize" said. Links is like Oxygen. Think of them as Website Food. That's the nature of the internet. Social signals, internet citations, activity on Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest and local / niche directories, yellow pages, forums etc based on the nature of your website/business, it all adds up. Panda is just trying to find and discount the effects of the "manipulations" per se. I hope that helps :). Good content, Good links - Works.