Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hmm that definitely looks peculiar, and I can't say for certain which of those would be more correct.

Would you be able to send examples of those keywords over to help@moz.com so we can do a bit more investigation on this, and potentially loop in the engineers if necessary? Thanks!

You could certainly consider checking out the folks on our recommended list of SEO consultants here: https://moz.com/community/recommended

To expand upon Mike's answer, you should be able to connect additional Google Analytics accounts within your campaign settings, like so: http://www.screencast.com/t/bQrQbLpN

Howdy!
I'm afraid that I don't have any sort of specific timeframe to offer about the official launch of Moz Local UK. Negotiating contracts for the proper partners in a different local search ecosystem, and configuring a billing setup to accommodate multiple currencies has proven quite a task which is why the process is taking longer than anticipated.

I apologize for the wait, and we'll be working to get this up and ready just as soon as we're able!

While the date isn't readily available within the app, you can grab it from the Historic Rankings CSV.

Provided that you entered at least 1 keyword into your campaign during the creation process, the oldest date at the bottom of the Historic Rankings CSV would be your initial campaign creation date

Howdy!
Sorry for the conflicting values! We did just release a fresh index update which is available through the MozBar, but the update would have had a delay before being pushed into campaigns. So, if you were checking the campaigns before that update was published, then the MozBar would have been reporting June 9th data while the campaigns were still reporting data from May 4th.

With that being said, I took a look through a handful of your campaigns, and everything seems to be matching up as of now. But, if you're still seeing inconsistencies, then please feel free to write in to us at help@moz.com with a specific example

Hi Saurabh!
Sorry for the confusion! Your campaign (at the Standard or Medium level) will automatically crawl up to 50,000 pages of a site and return the results within the 'Crawl Diagnostics' section on a weekly basis.

The Crawl Test research tool is completely separate, and it will allow you to make on-demand crawls of up to 3,000 pages which can be viewed in a CSV. I hope this helps to clarify!

Certainly! 
You can request a CSV containing all of your ranking data from the dawn of your campaign by hitting the 'Email Rankings History CSV' button with the 'Keyword Rankings' section of your campaign :).

Howdy!
It looks to me as though this may just be a hiccup within the MozBar plug-in; notice that the bar for DmT is partially filled, but there is no value displayed. So, I'd recommend clearing your cache and cookies, and potentially checking the value in MozBar for Chrome.

Checking the value in Open Site Explorer's 'Compare Link Metric' section would also be a good way to see if the value does indeed exist :).

If none of those seem to resolve the issue that you're seeing, then I would recommend writing in to us at help@moz.com with some more specific examples.

Hi Ricardo! There are a couple different ways that you could configure your campaigns depending on how you want to see the information split up.

If you're looking to see all of your subdomains included in the same campaign, then you would simply want to create a campaign using mercadolibre.com the campaign URL. This will catch all of the subdomains as long as there is a link to each subdomain somewhere on the main portion of the site :).

Alternatively, if you wanted to split up each subdomain into a separate campaign, you would want to enter the subdomain URL as the campaign URL and then check the box under '+Advanced' options which will exclude all other subdomains.

Yep, this would definitely be a job for us on the Help Team to get this listing re-validated. Google has made some changes to their API which may have been the reason why we weren't able to view the Google+ page for this business, but it looks like it is currently visible to our system.

I'm passing your info right over to our engineers, and I'll let you know as soon as I receive an update :).

Hi Elizabeth!
As you supposed, this issue is stemming from the fact that our system doesn't include the ".training" TLD. This is a bit of a tricky one because people could theoretically create any TLD imaginable (".cyclops" is one that I've been coveting for a while), but these have to be explicitly defined within our system; there is no catch-all set up to know what is or isn't a TLD unless we specifically declare it within our index.

With that being said, I've sent over a request to have it included for the future :). I hope this helps to explain!

Howdy Nick!
This certainly looks peculiar, but I'm not totally sure what could be befouling the Crawl Test results in this way. I'm looking at it with a couple other folks on my team, and we'll follow up in your support request just as soon as we have something more concrete figured out

That would be awesome, indeed! While I can't make any sort of promises, I'll definitely recant your tales of groggy, sleepless eyes on a frosty Sunday morn to our Product Team to see if there's anything we can do

Hi Harry!

My initial thought is perhaps it's something browser-related. So, I'd recommend clearing your cache and cookies first, and then potentially uninstalling and reinstalling your MozBar; perhaps it has to do with the extension not updating fully.

It's a little tough for me to say for certain without being able to take a look at a particular example. So, if you're still running into issues, then I'd recommend shooting us some URLs where you're observing this over at help@moz.com

Well, you you could definitely get a CSV of every URL and title from the 'Crawl Diagnostics' section of a campaign, but admittedly we don't have anything that will collect all of the bodies for you.

Perhaps someone else would know of another tool that would be able to help you out with that portion of your needs :). Live long and Moz-per!

Yep, this does look like it's related to the fact that these are currently listed as service area businesses on Google+. If you were able to display the full street address from your corresponding Facebook pages, then we should be able to successfully pull that info in

Hi Tom!
Thanks for reaching out, and sorry for the confusion! The best section for this would be to head over to the 'Duplicates' tab from your main Moz Local Dashboard.

From there, you'll be able to us the 'Add alternates' function to list any other names, addresses or phone numbers that we should pull in for you

Howdy!
I spoke to one of the folks that worked directly on defining these spam flags, and they said that the calculations in this type of case are a bit too complex to pass along any sort of generalized guideline.

So, the best thing that I can recommend would be to check out Rand's video about how to interpret Spam Score: http://moz.com/blog/understanding-and-applying-mozs-spam-score-metric-whiteboard-friday

Howdy!
Thanks for reaching out, and sorry for the trouble! Unfortunately, we're not partnered with Hotfrog, so we aren't able to force them to share this information with us.

We've checked Hotfrog's API, but if they're not showing that listing information to us, then there's no way for us to display the information within your Moz Local listing. So, the best thing I could recommend would be to contact Hotfrog directly, and ask them to make sure that the listing is fully visible to Moz