Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Sounds great, there shouldn't be any problems then. Good luck with the launch!

All of the answers above are a good start. I would also suggest trying keywordtool.io for every celebrity name you want to talk about, and see what types of things people are looking for about those celebrities. Ubersuggest will perform this task as well.

Hi Riccardo, There are couple of errors with your code there. Firstly, the noindex attribute is used at a page level, not link level. If you want to noindex a page you should use the meta robots tag on the page itself. There is more information on the meta robots tag here. The nofollow attribute however, can be used at link level. You're essentially telling the search engines not to crawl this link. Secondly, the attribute isn't wrapped around any text so it's wasted code having it there. If you want your anchor text, 'Kumar' to be in italics, you should close the tag after the word. Also, replacing the tag with an tag (short for emphasis) is considered good practice. ____Finally, try not to use spaces in your anchor text. Modifying your code in this way will give you this: If you want the anchor text to be in italics: Kumar If you do not want the anchor text to be in italics: Kumar If you're interested in learning more about HTML (it's really easy!) W3C Schools is a good place to start. Happy coding!____

I'm still not 100% sure I understand the situation, but yes you should be able to add a noindex tag to this page I imagine. If you ant Google to find the videos linked out to from this page, use the noindex,follow tag rather than noindex,nofollow

However, just because an image is visible in Google Image search, does not mean you have the rights to simply use the image as you see fit. Other parties may have intellectual ownership over each image.

Profile links aren't generally great links.  It is however quite natural to have some of them. Like many things in SEO it is a good idea to try to look objectively at them and ask yourself why they exist.  If the links exist because there is genuine involvement in a number of sites (includin niche relevant ones) and those sites are of an acceptable quality then there is no real reason to disavow them.  If they existing because someone thought they would be a good way of getting links or they're in unnatural proportions or the sites are very poor quality then you might want to do somthing about them.  If you have the logins removal might even be better than disavow.

Hi there! Just jumping in in case anyone else stumbles on this thread, you can now find keywords a site is ranking for using Keyword Explorer which is included in your Moz Pro subscription. You can read more on our blog and on the Help Hub https://moz.com/blog/keyword-explorer-identify-competitive-keyword-opportunities https://moz.com/help/guides/keyword-explorer/ranking-keywords Cheers! Jo

You could put that portion of the page into an <iframe>and it wouldn't get indexed. However, I would not suggest doing that.</p> <p>Instead, I'd look into why that portion is what Google has decided to show. Remember, we write meta descriptions hoping that Google will decide to show that text in the SERPs. However, Google decides which is the best information to show and will adjust that information based on the user's search query.</p> <p>Is your site's information hierarchy sound? Meaning, does that aside information have headings or tags that make it more important to the page than your main information? What on-page factors may be causing Google to extract that side block information rather than your main information?</p></iframe>