Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Yes, it is compatible with both Firefox and Chrome. You can find it here: http://www.seomoz.org/seo-toolbar
I'm not sure we're distinguishing between traffic from the article sites and traffic from Google search. Are you looking to bring visitors directly from the article sites or are you looking to increase your search rankings?
I'm not sure if I can solve all of your issues, but here's a few thoughts:
For #2 - Google is probably just indexing the second page of the lists of posts on your site. You probably don't want to index these pages (and, thus, the meta description becomes irrelevant)
This might be helpful to eliminate that: http://www.johnfdoherty.com/noindex-organize-categories-tags-in-wordpress/
Same deal with archives pages and tag pages - just don't allow Google to index them.
I'm not sure if All-in-One SEO does this, but I believe there are other WP plugins out there than will, too.
Have you considered using the Mozrank instead of Alexa? This might be a better metric, plus it's easy to see if you use the MozBar extension for your browser. I definitely recommend this instead if you're attempt to obtain links for SEO value on any site (not just limited to article sites).
I'm not sure I would recommend article marketing for traffic like you're going after. Creating great content on your own site or guest posting on related industry blogs will almost certainly be a better strategy than submitting to general article sites.
When I access your site via "http://www.crosscountryallied.com," I'm redirected to "http://www.crosscountryallied.com/ctAlliedWebSite"
Is this what you want?
Either way, if both pages are just the home page for your site, I don't see why you would need both a 301 and a canonical tag in this case. Just use a 301 to the URL that you prefer.
If you're getting a 404 error, the page probably doesn't exist any more. You might have a link to an old page somewhere that still points to that page, resulting in the 404 error.
You can locate broken links on your site using something like this: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/xenu-link-sleuth-more-than-just-a-broken-links-finder
For duplicate content issues, see here: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/duplicate-content
You might not need to worry about stolen content if 1) Your content was indexed by Google first and 2) Your content outranks the stolen content in search. Here's a video from Matt Cutts at Google that might be of interest to you: http://youtu.be/4LsB19wTt0Q
If you're looking for something that will check your whole site or do it automatically, I'm not aware of a tool that does that. A lot of people use Copyscape (www.copyscape.com), but that might not solve your problems.
As far as I know, there's no way to merge accounts. I tried figuring this out recently, but couldn't find a way to make it happen.
David,
Yes, I've done this before. You can archive a campaign and re-activate it later. You just won't get any new data or crawl reports while it's in the archive state.
Seems like this should work, but I couldn't get it to work for my site. Thanks though
From what I can tell the first site you listed only works with PHP. Otherwise I would definitely go with that.
I'm sure I can find something to work out of the giant list from your second link. Thanks!
Is it possible to generate an XML sitemap for a site without PHP? If so, how?
Did you try running an "Advanced report" from the Campaigns area? This will provide you with up to 100,000 links, which presumably would include everything that SEOmoz has indexed. As Keri pointed out, this might not be everything that's out there.
Is it a relatively new link to your site? If that's the case the page containing the link might not have been crawled yet.
Here's a guide that gives you some more sites that can help: http://www.seomoz.org/article/keyword-research-guide
It's a little dated, but most of the stuff on there should still exist.
Personally, some of the strategies I used are:
Look at my analytics. Where are my visitors coming from? Are there any similar terms using synonyms or different word order that I need to target?
Look at competitors. What keywords are they targeting? You can find hints by looking at their content, title tags, meta tags (if they're well-optimized, that is).
I think another important question to ask is Am I ranked as highly as I can be for the higher-volume terms? To me, I'd rather effectively target the terms that the most people are searching for rather than attempt to target a lot of low-volume long tail terms.
1 - Go to the main Campaigns page.
2 - Click Settings next to the specific campaign you want to archive.
3 - Scroll to the bottom and hit "Archive".
Interesting analysis, but I doubt the auto-complete is as calculated as you are trying to make it here.
Have you seen the sites and jokes like this?: http://www.autocompletefail.com/
That pretty much says to me that you shouldn't put a lot of stock into Google auto-complete ranking the order of terms in relation to search volume.
I agree with Istvan.
I'd start with with the terms that people are most frequently using to find your site (based on what's in Google Analytics), and move down the list from there.
You could, in theory, be ranking for thousands of search terms, but many of those aren't valuable since almost no one will be searching for those terms.
I'm pretty sure Akismet does blacklist people based on IP. I've heard several people complain that they got accidentally blacklisted and couldn't comment on any Akismet blogs.
See here for a little info: http://www.growmap.com/akismet-test/
Thanks for your help, I get it now!
In addition to your video, I also found a post on Matt Cutts' blog that answers it:
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2009/12/handling-legitimate-cross-domain.html
Are you saying that I should remove the robots noindex tag altogether? If I do that, the pages with the canonical code will still show up in G, right?
If yes, Is there any alterative if I don't want that to happen?
Thanks for the help!
I'm working on a site that has pages for many wedding vendors. There are essentially 3 variations of the page for each vendor with only slightly different content, so they're showing up as "duplicate content" in my SEOmoz Campaign. Here's an example of the 3 variations:
http://www.weddingreportsma.com/MA-wedding.cfm/vendorID/4161
http://www.weddingreportsma.com/MA-wedding.cfm?vendorID=4161&action=messageWrite
http://www.weddingreportsma.com/MA-wedding.cfm?vendorID=4161&action=writeReview
Because of this, we placed a rel="canoncial" tag in the second 2 pages to try to fix the problem. However, the coding does not seem to validate in the w3 html validator. I can't say I understand html well enough to understand the error the validator is pointing out.
We also added a the following to the second 2 types of pages
<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
Am I employing this tag correctly in this case? Here is a snippet of the code below.
<html>
<head>
<title>Reviews on Astonishing Event, Inc from Somerset MAtitle>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="[/includes/style.css](view-source:http://www.weddingreportsma.com/includes/style.css)">
<link href="[http://www.weddingreportsma.com/MA-wedding.cfm/vendorID/4161](view-source:http://www.weddingreportsma.com/MA-wedding.cfm/vendorID/4161)" rel="canonical" />
<meta name="robots" content="noindex">
<meta name="keywords" content="Astonishing Event, Inc, Somerset Massachusetts, Massachusetts Wedding Wedding Planners Directory, Massachusetts weddings, wedding Massachusetts ">
<meta name="description" content="Get information and read reviews on Astonishing Event, Inc from Somerset MA. Astonishing Event, Inc appears in the directory of Somerset MA wedding Wedding Planners on WeddingReportsMA.com.">
<script src="[http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js](view-source:http://www.google-analytics.com/urchin.js)" type="text/javascript">script>
<script type="text/javascript">
_uacct = "UA-173959-2";
urchinTracker();
script>
head>