Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks for that.

Yet, if he caches the pages serverside, that would avoid the re-request to the DB.

Then there are also the certified partners that have "railgun" running automatically with CloudFlare hence making the requests between CloudFlare and the host much faster, as it actually only sends what has "changed" on a page.

https://www.cloudflare.com/railgun

Hey!

It seems that you already have the correct answer: "It is a punch of useless content.", "now it is better to focus on your product site or create 1 good websites rather than a network of sites".

Content without added value means useless, and therefore outranked by better sites.

It would help if you tell us a little more about the platform you are using. If it is wordpress, you should go with the Yoast SEO plugin, which will make all the changes and adjustments for you, while you can set specific METAs for specific posts.

Reports are exported as PDF, so you can't edit the text directly. However, there are some tools that allow you to edit PDF files as if they were DOC files, for example NitroPDF (it's not free, but is worth it. And they offer a free trial I think).

Google prioritizes results that they consider more valuable.

Imagine someone looking for a private equity firm database, they WON'T type private equity firms, as those who enter that are either looking for the meaning of "private equity firms" or news about "private equity firms".

Google might have ranked you on top for some time, but after the release of hummingbird, everything changed, now Google tries to "understand" what you are thinking, what you are looking for and present the best possible results, not only based on the query itself, but also taking into account search history, habits, etc.

You should also consider that your Website, compared to the others shown for that specific query, has a very low domain and page authority. Plus it lacks of any kind of social signals.

No you are not.

EMD penalties are for the ones that abuse that. ie: have several EMD pointing to the same site; have the entire site flooded with the keyword, etc.

RSS feeds as duplicate content? That's the first time I hear something like that.

Feeds are intended for feed readers, which basically is a file that tells the title of the page/story, a small portion of the content/summary and the location of the actual document, an URL where you can read all the article/page.

It also helps crawlers find new content in your site by scraping the feed instead of the whole site, but it does not SEO benefit, other that "perhaps" having your new pages indexed faster.

Well, I checked the site and you are already adding the page number to the title. Then do the same for the Categories / or any other area that is being "paged".

bloh/page/2/

title: Blog dental de Clinicas Dentales Propdental - Página 2 de 59
desc: Lee sobre cierto tema y aprende bla bla bla - Pagina 2

In my case I would remove the "de 59" just to avoid the 70 chars limit in titles.

You can get great info here: http://moz.com/learn/seo/title-tag and here: http://moz.com/learn/seo/meta-description

Hope that helps.

It doesn't really matter that much if you use the alt text, and title well to describe the image. However, I always recommend (and do it myself) renaming the image to match the title, in your case something like orange-campervan-cornwall-uk.jpg.

Always use dashed to separate words, not underscores

Holy... this IS weird.

Checked the robots.txt and there's nothing blocking the indexing, robots meta tags are present with INDEX.

You clearly need urgent access to Webmaster tools, seems like a penalty for pure spam or something like that, as there's no 1 single page indexed, while there are other sites linking to it.

What I would do? Before doing any further onsite SEO, get that resolved. Go to Webmaster tools and check any manual action, message, etc. Try the fetch as googlebot. Then go to Google's Webmaster forums and ask, usually someone from Google jumps in.

There are several other sites that re entirely dedicated to check keyword rankings. But no matter which one you choose, checking rankings for 10,000+ keywords will be expensive as hell.

Examples: serps.com, trackpal, positionly, etc.

I think you can find the answer to your question in this other thread: http://moz.com/community/q/what-are-benefits-to-develop-large-html-sitemap

I think you are forgetting that engines are capable of running Javascript just fine, and all the content that is brought via AJAX to be viewable to the user will also be indexed by search engines.

I would certainly go with option 4, it's a standard Today, but have a look at the "pushState", that and address manipulation, that way, your users will be able to access an exact review (say in page 3) by just typing the address: http://www.mysite.com/blue-widget-review-page3 and have by default the page 3 loaded.
If you go this route, you can also put a hidden (css'ed) NEXT PAGE button at the end to link to the next page.

Hope that helps!

Are you using a CNAME of your main domain for that server? Like sounds.example.com? You should, if you aren't. I don't think pagerank can flow to a sound file. But I am not entirely sure, tho.

As @jessconfitti said, you are 100% correct. If a user browses more than 1 page in your site, it would not be a bounce. Even if after the second page the users clicks back to whatever Website they came from.

Have you tried OSE to find links pointing to the new URL and the old one?

Everything that Alex said PLUS fill a reconsideration request. Wait a couple of weeks for Google's response. Your request MUST explain all the steps you made to clean up your site and be in compliance with Google's TOS (with proof and all)!

Exactly my point.

You show the "http://www.domain.com/login?return=the-actual-linked-page" to non-logged in users and bots. while you show "http://www.domain.com/the-actual-linked-page" to logged in users. By doing that you don't have any 3XX redirects.

That is only truth if the new theme that you are going to use has errors. If it has been SEO'ed and all the content will be the same, you may some rankings decline until Google spiders the new site and re index it. But that shouldn't take very long.

You need to think on the users first, will the users love the new site? If they will, then Google will follow, don't worry about that.

I would start with <cite class="vurls">www.w3schools.com/php/</cite> if your website is PHP based and a little of MySQL.

Anyway, here at Moz there's a HUGE community willing to help, and many of them, such as me, are programmers and I don't bother at all helping, in fact, I love it.

So just feel free to ask! You can private message me with questions