Welcome to the Q&A Forum

You could use "Duplicate post" plugin to clone your posts and then schedule those cloned posts.

You usually need to verify both the www. and naked subdomain, in order to prove that you control both. It's silly for small businesses, but makes sense for larger sites, especially those that allow subdomains to be controlled by users. Not sure if that answered your entire question, let me know if not.

It looks like around 40% users here in SEOMOz are in fact agencies.. based on what Rand said in todays WBF: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/conducting-market-research-before-investing-in-tactical-execution-whiteboard-friday

I don't think you didn't mentioned that you were paying for the link! RISK / REWARD / EFFORT(COST) Personally I wouldn't pay $200-300 for one such link on the kind of page you're talking about. Think about how much difference the one link is likely to make. Are you going to see a change in your rankings, or any direct traffic how much additional traffic will it take to make it worthwhile (what's your goal conversion rate, and what's the value of these goals) You can get higher quality links for much less!

Hi Eyepaq, SEOmoz using a CDN to host all of our images, though we set up a DNS change so they can be hosting on a third party server but listed at cdn.seomoz.org.  Doing what you are talking about shouldn't effect any of your "juice" if you are just using it to display your images using the img tag or via css.  You pdfs might be affected since you are using a <a href="">tag which tells Google you are linking to that file.  In the long run you will be much better off than anything you might lose by doing something like this.</a> <a href="">Casey</a>

I'd say you can safely put this issue aside. As you've mentioned yourself, xml files don't need title tags, and I presume you aren't trying to have this page rank in the SERPS in the first place anyway. Perhaps one of the SEOmoz fellows can look into this?

Well, I would recommend you alter the internal links to just point to the new '/' default, but in the meantime... I would have thought your code would have worked, but every time I try it my site falls over. It might work for you though. Give it a try but test it straight away I'll see if I can get a different version working on my test site for you if not