Howdy,
So, typically, if category pages have typical product information like prices, names etc., all the schema will be the same. There is no special schema which will be used on category pages only. The rest transfers.
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Howdy,
So, typically, if category pages have typical product information like prices, names etc., all the schema will be the same. There is no special schema which will be used on category pages only. The rest transfers.
Howdy,
Well, to my understanding is that link wheel is a link wheel. No matter if you own the domains/hosting or not. If you do something spammy or potentially "illegal" in the eyes of Google, they won't care who owns the domain 
Yes, they are called SEO consultants. There are plenty on this forum, including myself. 
Well, everyone started at some point, right?
So, with proper learning, trial and error and a lot of work, you sure can. The only thing is that it'll take much longer, since you'd have to learn everything from scratch
Another thing is that if you do something wrong (and there is a quite chance since you are new at this), your ranking would drop.
So, if you are willing to take risk and invest a lot of time - sure you can, we believe in you 
Howdy.
It's interesting. I checked your queries in both google versions, it works/shows properly to me. Have you checked the query on other computers in your area? Did you try checking in other browsers? with all the cached and history cleaned out?
Howdy.
Have you added the htaccess redirect rule recently? What might be happening is - Moz crawls your website about once a month, so, if your htaccess rule was added less than a month ago, those redirects might be simply not crawled yet. What you can do is to check it with other free tools like semrush trial for such errors.
Hope this helps.
Hi there.
No, MOZ is not for "SEOing a website" 
It's a tracking software. It shows you errors with your website and tracks your current ranking positions. What to do with this data - that's the question and that's what SEO experts do. We use that data to understand what should be optimized on the website.
If you google "what is MOZ", there are quite a few articles from different sources explaining what MOZ is and who uses it and if you should you it.
As for different SEO resources, simply google "best seo blogs" for bunch of lists, here is one of them:
Hope this helps.
I'd say that it's due to collateral links and, as Ria is saying below, Pinterest might still have dofollow links from the past. Another thing to consider is on-page engagement. Basically, if there are a lot of links and people loving the content, they would be clicking to the website, and, if the content on the website is equally good or better, engagement metrics (time on page, bounce rate etc), will be good as well. And we do know that engagement is one of the ranking factors.
Oh, come on.
Does Google use the # of shares or something - of course not. But there is definite correlation between rankings and popularity. Surely not causation, but correlation. The idea is that the more popular content is the more likes, shares etc it will have, which, in turn, will cause getting more links. More links = better rankings.
Maybe I simply formulated it wrong 
Howdy.
Hreflangs implementation works along with browser settings. So, getting rid of hreflangs and rely on browser settings alone will not fix your problems.
I wonder if all those errors have something to do with your hreflangs not working properly.
Other than that, you can use IPs for "helping" browsers to determine the location. You can use suggestive popup or banner for languages etc like:
Hope this helps.
Howdy.
So, there are couple ways to do it.

Hope this helps 
Howdy.
It seems that the answer lays in Page Authority. Basically, it shows me that you don't have any links to those specific pages. You do have nice domain authority and a lot of links to domain, but links to actual page, especially with proper anchor texts will do miracles 
Hope this helps 
Howdy,
Yes, you won't be able to see anything in server logs. What happens is that the crawler is not getting proper response data. There are couple good explanations in other Q&As. And it's not necessarily robots.txt problem. Read these:
ย https://moz.com/community/q/803-error
https://moz.com/community/q/how-to-permanently-fix-the-moz-crawl-803-error
https://moz.com/community/q/how-do-fix-an-803-error
Hope this helps 
Howdy,
What type of analysis are you talking about?
Howdy.
Yes, it can strengthen and yes, google will notice. At least eventually. Now, it's not clear which link you are talking about - inbound or outbound. But anyway, the answer is the same, just the "amount" of benefits will be different.
Hope this helps 
Howdy.
So, links from social media are not that effective, because search engines know it's social media, anybody can post anything in any amounts. Therefore Google doesn't pay pretty much any attention to such links.
However, social signals do have a lot of value. We have seen a lot of positive changes after good social media campaigns. It's not a secret that Google looks at social media popularity in their rankings. So, yeah, that's how social affects SEO 
Howdy.
Yes, canonical or 301 redirect would be your friend. How much time did you give google to reindex before your verdict was "canonical didn't work"? Also, have you "fetched as Google" after you've done canonical?
Also, here is another question, why is having paginated version in SERPs bad?
Another way to influence your inner rankings is internal links. When you link to job offers page, which link do you use? The one which has more links and more relevant anchor text will be more likely to show in SERPs.
Hope this helps.
Howdy.
My answer would be "User Intent", and "User Experience". Basically, Would user expect such short, simple page? Or after landing there they'd have more questions than answers, which would make them go all over the website to find what they want to know? That's how I would determine what should or shouldn't go on pages. If your product is a pen, I really doubt that people would be interested in how the molecular structure of it looks. Yet, if it's a lego set, then they'd wanna see the images and videos of how it's gonna look when it's done, dimensions, number of pieces etc.
Hope this makes sense.
Howdy.
It seems to me that you have duplicate content issues. Do you guys have any canonicals at all? How close is the content from one website to another?
So, if you want both websites to rank for the same product, which seems a bit pointless to me, since you'll have to double up all the efforts, budgets etc, you would need to have unique content on both sites, unique descriptions, all meta tags etc.
If you want only one to rank, then yes, canonical will do it. Also the link mass will have a lot of effect. Basically, if your large site has let's say 100 times more links with relevant anchor texts and from relevant websites, it can still be ranking over the microsite.
Hope this helps 