Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Yeah I just feel like if SEO people put half the effort they put into tricking Google, into doing SEO the right way and creating value that they could have one hell of an SEO product.
What you are essentially looking to do is create web spam.
It seems like a lot of effort for something that may work for a whille but will almost surely be figured out eventually and doesn't bring any value to your clients.
Do you really need one? If so WP Super Cache is pretty great. I don't think most sites need it though.
I swear I read in a recent post that Google frowns on large redirect to your homepage... Am I crazy??? I tried to find where I read this but can't remember. Anyone? Bueler?
Well thats a pretty easy experiment. And the results appear to be that a proxy is not necessary.
I searched for SEO firm on google.co.uk from my office in San Diego and from a UK proxy @ http://goproxing.biz
Here are screen shots of both SERPS. While not an extensive test it appears that US based IPs can get UK results when searching google.co.uk
Eric,
Let me add that the keyword difficulty tool doesn't necessaraly apply to local search. A LOT of other stuff is looked at as far as local SEO.
You should check out David Mihm's bolg. It is one of the BEST resources available in local search.
Found it! http://www.seomoz.org/blog/301-redirect-or-relcanonical-which-one-should-you-use Check out the section "Redirecting all pages in one go to a single URL" "Although the intention may not be manipulative, there have been cases of people doing this to try and consolidate all the link juice from loads of pages into one page, to make that page stronger. This can sometimes put up a flag to Google who may come and take a closer look at whats going on." This post does also come with a Matt Cutts video discussing this. Hope that helps!
Reviews, price and fresh data play a huge role.
This article is from 2009 but still very relevant IMHO.
http://www.seomoz.org/qa/view/7062/google-base-shopping-results
I don't know if you saw this. Its very good timing that Rand wrote a blog post about this very subject!
Check it out, as always its a worthwhile read.
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/google-places-citations-5-tactics-to-earn-links-for-your-local-business
Thats a tough call. Would you redirect the old pages? If so where would you redirect them to? Redirecting to the home page is not a good idea. I would be cautious getting rid of content that has links to it without having somewhere to redirect thos pages.
It seems almost impossible to analyze all of the implications. Have you thought about removing older content in smaller batches? Maybe get rid of the least visited 5000 pages first to see how that impacts the site overall.
I am not sure I would be comfortable dumping that much content willy nilly without doing some testing.
Another option would be to make sure to redirect the old content to the category page so you don't just lose that link juice all together. I would highly recommend figuring out a redirect plan for that content. Losing the links is a bad idea!
Good question!! I have looked at that before and second Aaron's concern.
Has anyone else purchased these? I'd love to hear your feedback?
SEOmoz, are these still up to date-ish?
Thats a good tip. Beware of rewording products titles though. Especially for titles where people are searching for a specific branded product or will be searching for exactly the same title.
Have you submitted a news sitemap? It should only include links to your news articles.
http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/answer.py?answer=74288
Also it looks like they want to know more about your editorial review process. Here is the standard message from google about being included in News results.
We typically include sites in Google News that:
