Welcome to the Q&A Forum

That's a little reassuring. I think. At least we're both in this together.

Anyone else?

Thanks for this - very helpful. They aren't really the core pages though, so although this was super helpful I think something else is also going on.

Anyone else have an idea?

Hi

I monitor and track 20-25 sites. I got a -1 in DA across the board this month. Has anyone else experienced this. It's possible my server/cms guys have made a global change.

Has anyone at Moz or anyone in the community experienced this?

In my opinion, I would say less is more. If you have lots of pages with low page rank you will dilute your overall domain authority. Keep your content rich. Combine and cornerstone content where possible (into less pages), then amplify through social media.

Thanks for this - I can see the search results. Where can you see the date they were cached?

Thanks so much for the response.

I also got this report from https://www.whynopadlock.com

Soft FailureAn image with an insecure url of "http://www.key.co.uk/img/W/KEY/F7/IC/F7-112H204-1-LX.jpg" was loaded on line: 1 of https://www.key.co.uk/en/key.

Errors that are reported on line 1 are generally not part of the source code. This error may be caused by an external javascript file which is writing to the page, however we are unable to reliably detect these scripts in our automated test.
Please contact us using the "Need Help?" link below if you need assistance with resolving this error.

Hi

One of our sites has seen a 40% drop in traffic since a redesign

We have a complete 301 redirect list and have replicated all successful content.

https://www.englishriviera.co.uk

Any opinions would be most helpful.

A soft 404 means that a URL on your site returns a page telling the user that the page does not exist and also a 200-level (success) code to the browser. Can I heave an example URL??

Once google indexes pages it checks for the page from their own index. So the links may exist in googles database rather than being a link on your site or someone elses site.

When google checks for these pages: is your website responding with a 404? Or is your website presenting a 200 for some reason.

Maybe in the absence of the page your content management system is presenting a duplicate of a page further up the hierarchy? for example

Google needs to have a 404 response a few times before it will disappear from search console.

That's weird. I'm having the exact same issue.

My accommodation section isn't ranking.

The root page of the section is (accommodation) but none of the content pages inside

e.g.

https://www.visitliverpool.com/accommodation/hotels-in-liverpool should be ranking for 'hotels in Liveprool'

So frustrating

Hey Taysir

This has been asked here - https://moz.com/community/q/moz-vs-brightedge

Moz is a highly comprehensive intuitive and matured tool. I use Moz an Ahrefs. They're the ultimate tag team.

Thanks for this. I will set up the canonicalisation accordingly.

In regards to the internal clicks. I guess I was hoping that all the clicks would essentially be added together. As in - All of the actual page clicks and all the clicks variations with URL parameters.

But as internal clicks are not a ranking factor it doesn't matter.

Are the links to the page with parameters the only way the 'source' page benefits through using a cannnonical?

The falkland islands is technically part of the UK. Is it only mainland UK that is covered?

I can't get moz local to detect a google business listing.

Has anyone had this kind of problem?

5fjsN

Thanks James this has been so helpful. I've searched all matter of search terms but hadn't come across "dwell time" before. It's amazing how one search term can open up the internet for you.

I learnt another relevant search term in this article - "Unicorns" are apparently high performing internal pages. http://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2017/01/25/dwell-time-seo.

Thanks again

Hi Paul

Yes that is most helpful. I have a sub-question. I hope that's ok. You've been very helpful. Please see below.

I've also reposted it here - https://moz.com/community/q/internal-clicks-and-ctr-is-rel-canonical-better-than-noindex-in-this-case

Andrew

I currently have a search facility in a website that noindexes the search results which is ok.

But when you click one of the results it takes you to a product which is noindexes as it has URL params.

e.g. https://www.visitliverpool.com/accommodation/albion-guest-house-p305431?bookurl=%2Fbook-online%3Fstage%3Dunitsel%26isostartdate%3D2017-10-31%26nights%3D1%26roomReq_1_adults%3D1%26NumRoomReqs%3D1%26fuzzy%3D0%26product%3D305431

The product also exists as this which is indexed : - https://www.visitliverpool.com/accommodation/albion-guest-house-p305431

Should I canonicalise is this instance instead of no index?

Does CTR apply to internal links? i.e. Does search console consider internal clicks? Are internal clicks a ranking factor?

Thanks Paul that's helpful.

I will keep the results no indexed.

When you click one of the results it takes you to a product. But the product also has URL Params and is also no indexed.

e.g. https://www.visitliverpool.com/accommodation/albion-guest-house-p305431?bookurl=%2Fbook-online%3Fstage%3Dunitsel%26isostartdate%3D2017-10-31%26nights%3D1%26roomReq_1_adults%3D1%26NumRoomReqs%3D1%26fuzzy%3D0%26product%3D305431

The product also exists as this which is indexed

https://www.visitliverpool.com/accommodation/albion-guest-house-p305431

Should I canonicalise is this instance?

Does CTR apply to internal links? i.e. Does search console consider internal clicks? Are internal clicks a ranking factor?

Very very much yes. You'll see rankings improve.