Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hi Lisa,
When viewing posts per tag, the content on that page is identical to the content on another page which is triggering the dupe content.
The general rule of thumb is to no-index your tag pages. If you're using wordpress, Yoast SEO plugin allows you to set the no-index tag automatically.
Greg
I have always been under the impression that by connecting pages to their parent pages as described in a.) below is best practice and makes sense to me.
a.) yoursite.com/category/sub-category/product/
But then i also understand the importance in terms of link juice being spread out across so many sub pages, and by using Example b.) you keep the link juice in tact.
Your thoughts on this?
Greg
Moz doesn't just look at the text of a page, it also looks at the template and how "similar" it appears compared to other pages.
Here's a quote from Dr. Pete:
"Our system currently uses a threshold of 95% to determine whether content is duplicated. This is based on the source code (not the text copy), so the amount of actual duplicate content may vary depending on the code/content ratio."
Here are a few articles you can read to get a deeper understanding.
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/duplicate-content-in-a-post-panda-world
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/duplicate-content-block-redirect-or-canonical
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-illustrated-guide-to-duplicate-content-in-the-search-engines
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/rethinking-duplicate-content
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/fat-pandas-and-thin-content
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-illustrated-guide-to-duplicate-content-in-the-search-engines
Greg
Thanks Matt,
That's cleared it up.
I was always under the assumption that the publish date displayed in the serps was the date it was found and indexed.
Thanks again,
Greg
Thanks Mat,
I'm still not 100% clear on this.
Were it says "published 3 days ago" in the search results. Is this the date that google first found the page? Or does google get this from the published date set in the article?
Example: If i publish an article today, and say it was published in 2010 will Google display "Published 3 years ago" ? Or would it show the date Google first found the page?
Greg
Here's the scenario.
I create a page called "ABC" and it gets published and found by Google lets say on the 13th of April.
on the 15th (or 14th) i decide to update the URL, page Title, and content. (Redirect old URL to new URL as well)
Will Google still show this page as being published on the 13th? or would it update the publish date according to the new URL?
Greg
|
| | | | | <a id="question_reply-to-question-36769-description_codeblock" class="mceButton mceButtonEnabled mce_codeblock" style="color: #000000; border: 1px solid #f0f0ee; margin: 0px 1px 0px 0px; padding: 0px; background-color: transparent; cursor: default; vertical-align: baseline; width: 20px; border-collapse: separate; display: block; height: 20px;" title="Create Code Block" tabindex="-1"></a>
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
1.) Your sitemap isn't indexed by google (I cant find it in the search results) site:http://villasdiani.com/sitemap_index.xml
Include a link to your sitemap on your home page footer (preferably site wide)
Submit your sitemap to Google in Webmaster tools to confirm its been indexed.
2.) Come to think of it, because your archive template pages target the same keywords, perhaps you can actually check that option to no-index paginated pages as there is no need to index them. (all paginated pages target the same keywords creating whats called "cannibalization" which essentially means your pages are competing with each other)
While your at it though, be sure to also update the title tags for these archive pages.
IE: "Beach Villas" could be "Kenya Luxury Beach Villa's"
When you edit the page, you should see the Yoast tool near the bottom with an option to include a Title Tag.
Good luck!
Greg
The examples you gave aren't duplicates so don't worry about enabling that option.
All the "rentals" pages are using the archive template. Essentially its just a template like any other template you have set up. Usually archives list historical articles and posts and are generally no-indexed but your archive template is set up differently.
2 things i noticed.
You don't have a sitemap on your home page and nothing here: http://villasdiani.com/sitemap.xml
Your archive title tags im guessing are generated automatically, you might want to change the title tags on all "rentals" pages and only include the main descriptive keyword.
I hope this helps.
Greg
Instead of asking for something, stand out from the crowed and GIVE them something.
Link to them in one of your posts, share something of there's on your FB profile, engage on their forums and add value to the conversations.
Helping someone without asking for anything in return is a great way to build a lasting relationship. In time, they will link to you without you even having to ask, even if you ask, at least you wont be another random in their email inbox. After engaging with them, at least they would know who you are and might respond positively to your emails.
Just remember, its not about "building" links anymore. Its about earning them!
Greg
The reason for this option is to avoid duplicate content from being indexed.
Could you give an example of one of your category pages?
Greg
Its not bad at all in my opinion, especially if its a sub domain.
All its going to do is pass on SEO value to your root domain.
If you'd like to keep the link juice on your blog intact, you could make the menu links no-follow.
Greg
Thanks Tom,
I've noticed a few sites doing this lately. Mostly with a separate directory or "resource" page. I assume its because they don't want people to leave their website? If they were trying to avoid link juice from parsing, surely they would just make the link no-follow?
Here's another example: This one doesn't have such a long URL though..
http://www.embajada-sudafrica.cl/instituciones-comisiones.htm
Hi All,
Noticed this link in opensiteexplorer. Its not marked as no-follow, but not sure if this link would pass any value?
http://goafrica.about.com/od/southafrica/a/selfdrivesa.htm
Click on any external link, it takes you to a "preview" page from within the main website.
Is this a false positive? As in it shows as a follow link, but when you actually click it, it doesnt redirect to the website.
Any thoughts on this?
Greg
I think I've answered my own question..
We cant get local listings for each branch location as we need have a G+ profile for each etc, but can do rich snippets and other markups that will separate these pages from the rest of the serp results.
Hi All,
Something i'm trying to understand about Google local but cant find precise info about what we are thinking of doing.
We are located in City A, but also provide our services in almost every city in our country. We broker the service to branches that don't have their own local websites and want to take advantage of being listed in each city by marking up the address of each branch on each of our specific branch pages.
All our pages are currently marked up using the physical company address. Would their be any issues marking up separate branch pages to the corresponding branch address, and then taking advantage of Local results in many areas around the country?
In other words,
Is it possible for a single website to mark up separate pages for different locations and take advantage of local results for each?
Thanks in Advance
Greg
Are you sure you haven't over optimized to try and rank for ALL the keywords you have listed?
You should try rank for just one or two, and optimize for new keywords later on.
I've always wondered about that...
I think that especially for commercial terms, you would want to diversify your anchor profile were possible.
But then you have a case were the brand name is not commercial, in this case i would think using your brand name in your anchor is best.
I remember cleaning up our link profile by changing commercial anchor text to just using our brand name which helped, but then what about the exact match domains? Does this apply for them as well? Is it possible to have a "brand" with a term like "Cardiscount.com" without Google mistaking it for a commercial term?
As you say, mix and match is the best approach just a bit confusing building a brand when the brand itself is a commercial term.
Greg
Pages and Domains are read differently with these tools i imagine.
Your domain has "internet marketing" but your page might not.
If you would prefer NOT to have the keyword in the PAGE url aswell as the domain (for user experience reasons), i wouldn't stress about it as the keyword IS in the URL..
Its just a case of the tools reading the page URL and not taking the domain keywords into consideration.
Greg
I think what the OP wants to do is create a few micro sites with the main objective of getting links to his main website.
OP, its not worth the time and effort. If the microsite serves a purpose other than simply linking to your site from within the articles then go for it. If your hoping to see an improvement in rankings by doing this, its not going to be worth your while.
Greg
http://www.seomoz.org/pages/search_results?q=link+building.
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/category/whiteboard-friday
http://www.seomoz.org/beginners-guide-to-seo
The above URL's will get you started. Link building is not a simple as submitting a link here and there. Its better to understand the process as a whole and your view on link building will be less daunting.
There are many different ways to go about building links and wont bore you here. Just take your time and soak up as much knowledge on the topic as you can. (then come back here and ask more questions! 
Greg