Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I was also worried about it, but thank you for sharing good information. TEAM : 토토사이트 [image: ZPfBTNanAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC]

Sam09, My guess is the links aren't very good if GSC isn't reporting on them. First step: Is the page on which the links appear indexed by Google? Can you find it with a SITE: or INURL: search on Google? If the page is indexed, can you see the last cache date? Is it before or after your links were put there? If after, are the links still there with JavaScript turned off? Are they still there for Google? Are they sill followable? Questions like this don't get many answers because there really isn't a good answer. It depends on many, many factors.

You could do "site:yoururl.com" in google search to see what's indexed in Google.

Are we taking these spammy posts seriously?

The answer Google would like you to believe is that it's possible for the word ordering to imply different intents. In reality though, I think it's mainly an artefact of them not fully understanding meaning, or not being able to classify all pages and keywords perfectly. My colleague Sam Nemzer wrote a post with research on this topic that you might find interesting.

Please, any answer to this?

You could assign a priority to the page by using your sitemap, but on the other hand the priority is sometimes completely up to google.

Hi - thanks for reaching out. One thing to keep in mind is the data we collect in our index will vary from what they collect in there's. If you are seeing data in Link Explorer but not in their tools, most likely this is because we have data around your site, and they do not. We hope that helps, let us know if you have further questions we can assist with.

Yep, add to it, labels are not the #1 argument a website is being listed or shown in search in the first place. So dont put too much of effort into a label really.

When you use MOZ's Link Explorer, and input URL, not domain, it shows it right away. Here is the screenshot: https://dmitrii-regexseo.tinytake.com/tt/NDQ0NTk3MF8xNDA1NjM4OA And, if you want to see PAs for a given domain, click on the "Top Pages" on the right: https://dmitrii-regexseo.tinytake.com/tt/NDQ0NTk3M18xNDA1NjM5Mg

It's a myth that your DA drops because you put links in disavow. Disavow is a google only (or bing) tool, where lets say you get spammy links from a rogue domain and there's no way you can get 'm removed. MOZ cant read your disavow file either you file into google. So i'm not sure on how the link is being put here. With MOZ, or any other tool, they just calculate the amount of incoming, FOLLOW links and presume your DA on some magical number. Thats all there is to it. Again, PA/DA has nothing in common at all with Google as Google maintains their own algorithm.

Links really need months in time to be really effective. So as long as your losing links are not that much of a value, your good.

My Friend, I think that is fine. I would do that. I wish you all the best in your project!

Note that, in addition to what others have said here, it can often be the case that consolidating two websites in the same industry can result in less traffic than the total the two were receiving previously. This is because it's possible that both were ranking for some of the same queries before the merge, and yet the merge doesn't move the top result up (because the result above is significantly more powerful) and hence the net result for that query is just to remove one result you own from the search result page. Just a word of caution as you model this impact.

My Friend, I would love to help you. Feel free to send me the URL that is not being indexed and I will look into it.

Hi Mike - Thanks for contacting us, It might be best to follow the advice mentioned above. We all use password managers here at Moz and have never experienced this issue. Additionally, we haven't seen other reports of this happening. Let us know what you find!

Yes, that "loading" score is horrible. Just 8 seconds to load the first few batches of threadwork (javascript). Imagine the experience for a mobile user on limited data or so.  Offload as much as possible of scripts; really having a neat website does'nt require so much bells and rings all over the place.

Hi, I have the same experience with Portafina. It not only slowed down my speed, but also the performance.But disowning helped me a lot. Thanks

Hi  Jeroen, Many websites have category or listings pages that contain substantially different lists of links each time Google crawls them. This can be because they are rotating the top listings (like you describe) or simply because the velocity of content creation (and in some cases archiving / removal) is high enough that it appears to change dramatically (think e.g. the reddit "new" page). As such, I don't think you need to do anything particularly special here - it should "just work" for the page in question - depending on the details, you might want to make sure that there is enough other content on the page that it is substantial enough in its own right. The other thing I'd consider is whether you want to have more static crawl-paths available to make sure that googlebot always has a way of discovering and crawling all listings - whether you do this via categories, tags, or via some other means.