Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
For a link to be indexed, it needs to be found first. Moz and Google are not the same. And they dont really share their data, as google is sometimes less consistent in the found links compared to Moz or a hrefs. New websites take some time, perhaps up to 4 weeks before you anything at all. Have patience.
If the removal of the low quality links does'nt work from your side, you could also use disavow ( https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/disavow-links-main ) > you have to be logged in into google for this feature.
Apparently your page or site is missing a <title>Some title</title> per page. You have to check and correct that. Title should be something what your page is about.
If the URl's stays the same, yes. If you change the URL it's advised to put a 301 redirect, i.e
redirect 301 /oldpage.xyz /newpage.xyz
Could you tell us what you are trying to archieve in the first place? Your script proberly wont work, because domain.com is'nt replaced with your own domain, second it's code is only valid for HTTP instead of https, so to work with what we have here, try this:
RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^[A-Z]{3,9}\ /index.html\ HTTP/
RewriteRule ^index.html$ https://generalapplianceservice.ca/ [R=301,L]
RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} .html
RewriteRule ^(.*).html$ /$1 [R=301,L]
Keywords are'nt used anymore. Your better off putting a intro like this:
Blablabla interesting story about our service, come get your "Some keyword" today
. The best way really is not to spam it, rather put it elegant and keep within the 5% of optimisation when writing text.
Google is testing your pages using Lightspeed / Core Web vitals, or simply said https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
The page speed testing done by MOZ is different then Lighthouse, because google actually relies on a real rendering scene rather then passively load everything together.
So if you want to get better scores to site speed, optimize using insights as the link above posted. Alot of gains can be made and the Time to first byte and actual rendering time could be improved massively.
Check your incoming links. They are pretty much the cause to building up a spam score or not. Low quality links with no real usage are the ones to look for. Buying you a subscription is'nt going to magically improve your website. It needs work. Moz provides the tools!
Looks like a URL error / mistake, normally it shoud'nt go beyond /shop/product/type/ etc and not /shop/product/type/product/type/product/type/
Try to generate a proper sitemap; and then resubmit to MOZ.
Ive posted this before, but, the use of H1/H2/H3 compared to only use of H1 or H2 dont matter really that much. We had a very well running website, 1500 clicks a day or so, we had a argument on the use of only H2 and if we switched that to H1/H2/H3 / correct paragraphs if it would change any. So we did, and 6 months later, not really a change.
I kind of have the feeling that description and the way you publish your content in relation of H1/H2/H3 tags are kind of ignored by google these days, as google pretty much decides now on how to display your relevancy in search. So just make sure the content is OK, and your good really. Dont hurt tho to have things put up correctly.
The canonical url was pretty much designed for websites that initially had alot of semi-duplicate content pages. A webshop for example that sells 5x the same product, with the only difference the color (in white, black, gray etc). This could cause confusion and it's best practice to use it.
I deploy it these days on all websites; i dont see alot gain from it really, as MOZ is a indicator on what should be improved technical wise on your website. But it dont hurt either.
Dont overblow it really. I'm working on that too right now with positive effects, i.e /subject/another-subject/, it would be good if you link all the independent pages from /subject/ as well including a dropdown menu on /subject/ with all /another-subjects/.
1: If done right and google picks it up as it should you should see some gains for just updating your website.
2: you only have to submit a sitemap if you made physical changes to your website structure and pages, meaning that if you have'nt changed any of that you dont need to. A sitemap is just an index on how your website related to pages looks like.
3: See answer one.
Yep. Completely normal. Mind you going from DA 1 to 10 is pretty easy, going from 75 to 80 is a complete different level.
Is'nt it if you dont fill anything in MOZ will decide it for you?
Moz is a tool to get your website 'better', but you need to put some effort in it in order to make it work. A subscription is'nt going to magically improve rankings out of nowhere.
Structure like a theme dont change the content, so yes you can safely change that. The URL's will remain the same as well so that shoud'nt cause an issue at all.
Yes it might be a bit behind in comparison to what is currently available on yours or another website.
You answerred most of your own questions i think.
1: Yes. If you have genuine unique content google and partners are more then happy to take you aboard.
2: No, not really. DA is measured on behalf of the incoming follow links. If the content would be better so should your general site appearance become in search after the migration.
3: It's half work but it's a start. If you see a positive gain after the change then it's wise to change the other pages as much as possible as well.
This is the MOZ public forum. To contact MOZ themself see https://moz.com/help/contact