Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Of course, but it's a pain in the bleep to do that over and over again for each KW. Thanks though.

Ok thanks for the clarification. We try to take a 1-2 keyword per page focused approach so I was trying to wave my hands at the grader to say  "over here"

Thanks again!

For the keyword difficulty tool, if I want to see the details, I have to click on the keyword in order to see the list of the competitors and their DA and RLRDs.

Is there a way to download this list for all of the keywords and their DA and RLRDs?  The only bulk I can download is the list of keywords in my difficulty tool list along with their Bing search volume and keyword difficulty %.

Thanks!!!1

So we've optimized a home page for a particular keyword, "blue widgets tx".  But the on-page grader is giving information about "tx blue widgets", "blue widgets in texas", etc. and telling us we are an "F" for these keywords.

Is it possible to tell the on-page grader, "Hey, just worry about 'blue widgets tx', and forget about those other ones"?  I know I can do it by hand, but it will take forever.

Well thanks for your openness and your suggestion.  I agree that it makes logical sense that if you are an MD, to go as an MD.  Many thanks!

Thank you for your reply.  And yes, if the website doesn't come up for the Dr.'s own name in search then we've got bigger fish to fry.

But all things being equal, as an adjunct to other traditional SEO techniques, does the "physician" schema.org classification make any difference over "LocalBusiness"?

It is really a semantic difference, or does the subcategory under "LocalBusiness" really make a signifigant difference?

Then again, I would imagine that it coudn't hurt, especially if the SE's decide in the future to actually use the subcategories (physicians, lawyers, etc).

Thanks.

I have a physician who is a client and I'm wondering:  is there any advantage to having their schema.org as "LocalBusiness" vs.  Physician?

Clearly as Physician is a sublisting, it should be fine.  But I'm just curious.  Other than future-proofing is there any "real-time" advantage?

Thanks for any insight!

Hi,
I'm looking at a crawl test report, and I'm seeing that most of the pages have the sitemamp.gz file listed as the referrer.  As I recall in my other reports the referrer is usually the root domain - unless of course there's a redirect.

Does having sitemap.gz as the referrer indicate a problem? If so, what problem does it indicate?

Thanks!

Hi,

Much of the reading I've done has suggested that existing Google Places/Business Page (with "About" and "Photos" on top) will be automagically "upgraded" to Google Plus Local pages (with "About" and "Photos" and "Reviews" and all the other Google Plus items).

However, is there a way to force an upgrade?  I have a Google Places/Business Page and when I go to "manage page" it basically wants me to create a separate Google + Page for the Business.  Is this the correct thing to do?  Do I need to create a Google + Page for the company first, and then try to merge the Places listing with the new Google + Page for the business?

Thank your for helping me clear this up!

Thanks I really appreciate your reply!

Thanks I really appreciate your reply!