it's hard to really decide, it depends on what you are wanting to do with the blogs at the end of it.
If its for businesses they should be alone
If its just as hobbies or something like that then together would work.
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
it's hard to really decide, it depends on what you are wanting to do with the blogs at the end of it.
If its for businesses they should be alone
If its just as hobbies or something like that then together would work.
found the problem I think.
Malware found ona few pages on your site
http://sitecheck.sucuri.net/results/www.top-10-dating-reviews.com/
nope that won't harm you, try to ensure it links back to you but no it wont do you any harm - it may even help in some cases
it sounds more like a warning about something that is easy to fix and won't be harming your rankings.
I'd suggest that until the webmaster responds you add a 301 redirect including the "broken" link space to your htaccess file. see http://perishablepress.com/blank-space-whitespace-character-htaccess/ for info
no trailing slash where you've got say .php or .html at the end
something I recall (though could be wrong) from the disavow frenzy is that it can take a long time for those pages to be discounted - mainly is they only get picked up the next time a page is indexed I think. Hope that helps
remove it temporarily and see if it fixes the issue? many an affiliate site have been caught loading malware on to devices by this kind of means - be careful
if you find the problem goes away great, contact the affiliate partner and ask them what is going on and to fix the problem - you won't be the only one in this boat i'm sure
dealing with your indexing issue first - depending on when you submitted depends how soon those pages may be indexed. I say "may" because a sitemap (yes answering another question) is just an indicator of "i have these pages" it does not mean they will be indexed - indeed unless you've a small website you will never have 100% indexation in my experience.
Spiders (search robots) index / visit a website / page via another link. They follow links to a page from around the web, or the site itself. The more links from around the web the quicker you will get indexed. (this explains why if you've 10,000 pages you won't ever get a link from other websites to them all and so they won't all get indexed). This means if you've a web page that gets a ton of links it will be indexed sooner than those with just 1 link - assuming all links are equal (which they aren't).
Spiders are not cyclic in their searching, it's very ad-hoc based on links in your site and other sites linking to you. A spider won't be sent to spider every page on your site - it will do a small amount at a time, this is likely why 44 pages are indexed and not more at this point.
A sitemap is (as i say) an indicator of pages in your site, the importance of them and when they were updated / created. it's not really a definitive structure - it's more of a reference guide. Think of it as you being the guide on a bus tour of a city, the search engine is your passenger you are pointing out places of interest and every so often it will see something it wan't to see and get off to look, but it may take many trips to get off at every stop.
Finally, Canonicals are a great way to clear up duplicate content issues. They aren't 100% successful but they do help - especially if you are using dynamic urls (such as paginating category pages).
hope that helps
44 relates to the number of pages with the same urls as in your sitemap - it is not everything that is index. Your old site is still indexed and being found, as Google visits those pages and gets redirected to a new page it is likely that number will increase (from 44) and the number of old indexed will decrease.
Google doesn't index sites on a one-off go around because then if may take say 4 months to come back and index again and if you've a new important page that gets lots of links and you don't get indexed and ranked for it because you've not been visited you wouldn't be happy. Also if this was done on every site it would take forever and take much more resources than even google has. it is annoying but you've just got to grin and bear it - at least you old site is still ranking and being found.
what url are you testing to get an A? and I assume this is using the SEOMoz tool for on page optimisation?
There could be many many reasons you don't rank above your competitor, from links to age, to authority and even quality of content. among other reasons....
very odd indeed.
Its a frame-forwarded url, it's something 123-reg.co.uk still offers
They sell it as "if you do this you can have two homepages/urls with different titles and descriptions but the same content" ... its nothing of the sort.
It would be near impossible to offer real SEO to the new url, it would do nothing for it.
It feels like a case of the company rebranding and this was the shortest way for them to "move" the site to a new place.
To do an audit just have one line - can't see website, it's in an iframe
good luck
something to check would be in WMT if you go to the advanced section of the index status chart you should see currently in the index and ever indexed, it sounds like you are just seeing the ever indexed number which could be huge for almost any website.